Díaz-Aguado María José, Martínez-Arias Rosario
Unidad de Psicología Preventiva, Faculty of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 9;13:850897. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.850897. eCollection 2022.
There has been little investigation of male adolescent violence against women as acknowledged by boys themselves, and even less on such violence in different contexts with comparative studies of behavior between those who perpetrate this violence and the population at large. This study used cluster analysis to establish a male adolescent typology based on boys' self-reporting of violence against women in three contexts. The participants were 3,132 Spanish teenage boys aged 14-18 with experience of relationships with girls. Three discrete, identifiable types were obtained: the first group (69.8%), of boys; the second group (26%), more involved in outside a relationship but with a low incidence of dating violence offline; the third group (4.2%), with but less involved in sexual harassment online than the second group. The logistic regression analysis showed that justification of male dominance and violence was the main risk condition for inclusion in the second and third groups, followed by low self-esteem (for the third group) and risky sexual behaviors online (for the second and third groups). The findings based on these results are important for preventing male adolescent dating violence against women in the three male types detected.
正如男孩自己所承认的那样,针对男性青少年对女性的暴力行为的调查很少,而对于这种暴力行为在不同背景下,以及对实施这种暴力行为的人与普通人群行为的比较研究则更少。本研究使用聚类分析,根据男孩在三种背景下对女性暴力行为的自我报告,建立了男性青少年类型学。参与者是3132名14 - 18岁有与女孩交往经历的西班牙青少年男孩。获得了三种不同的、可识别的类型:第一组(69.8%),为普通男孩;第二组(26%),更多地涉及恋爱关系之外的情况,但线下约会暴力发生率较低;第三组(4.2%),有恋爱关系,但在线性骚扰方面比第二组少。逻辑回归分析表明,男性主导和暴力的正当化是纳入第二组和第三组的主要风险条件,其次是低自尊(第三组)和在线危险行为(第二组和第三组)。基于这些结果的发现对于预防在检测出的三种男性类型中男性青少年对女性的约会暴力很重要。