Bao Jianxin, Jegede Segun Light, Hawks John W, Dade Bethany, Guan Qiang, Middaugh Samantha, Qiu Ziyu, Levina Anna, Tsai Tsung-Heng
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, United States.
Department of Research and Development, Gateway Biotechnology Inc., Rootstown, OH, United States.
Front Cell Neurosci. 2022 Mar 9;16:851500. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.851500. eCollection 2022.
The sound-evoked electrical compound potential known as auditory brainstem response (ABR) represents the firing of a heterogenous population of auditory neurons in response to sound stimuli, and is often used for clinical diagnosis based on wave amplitude and latency. However, recent ABR applications to detect human cochlear synaptopathy have led to inconsistent results, mainly due to the high variability of ABR wave-1 amplitude. Here, rather than focusing on the amplitude of ABR wave 1, we evaluated the use of ABR wave curvature to detect cochlear synaptic loss. We first compared four curvature quantification methods using simulated ABR waves, and identified that the cubic spline method using five data points produced the most accurate quantification. We next evaluated this quantification method with ABR data from an established mouse model with cochlear synaptopathy. The data clearly demonstrated that curvature measurement is more sensitive and consistent in identifying cochlear synaptic loss in mice compared to the amplitude and latency measurements. We further tested this curvature method in a different mouse model presenting with otitis media. The change in curvature profile due to middle ear infection in otitis media is different from the profile of mice with cochlear synaptopathy. Thus, our study suggests that curvature quantification can be used to address the current ABR variability issue, and may lead to additional applications in the clinic diagnosis of hearing disorders.
被称为听觉脑干反应(ABR)的声音诱发电复合电位代表了异质听觉神经元群体对声音刺激的放电,并且通常基于波幅和潜伏期用于临床诊断。然而,最近将ABR应用于检测人类耳蜗突触病变的结果并不一致,主要原因是ABR波1波幅的高度变异性。在此,我们不是关注ABR波1的波幅,而是评估使用ABR波曲率来检测耳蜗突触损失。我们首先使用模拟ABR波比较了四种曲率量化方法,并确定使用五个数据点的三次样条法产生了最准确的量化。接下来,我们用来自已建立的耳蜗突触病变小鼠模型的ABR数据评估了这种量化方法。数据清楚地表明,与波幅和潜伏期测量相比,曲率测量在识别小鼠耳蜗突触损失方面更敏感且更一致。我们进一步在另一个患有中耳炎的小鼠模型中测试了这种曲率方法。中耳炎中耳感染引起的曲率变化模式与耳蜗突触病变小鼠的模式不同。因此,我们的研究表明,曲率量化可用于解决当前ABR变异性问题,并可能在听力障碍的临床诊断中带来更多应用。