Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2022 May;34(5):453-465. doi: 10.1017/S1041610222000175. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
Depression is common in persons experiencing mild cognitive impairment (MCI), with 32% (95% Cl 27, 37) overall experiencing depression. Persons with MCI who have depression have more cognitive changes compared to those without depression. To understand how we can detect depressive symptoms in persons with MCI, we undertook a systematic review to identify tools that were validated compared with a reference standard.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane from inception to April 25, 2021, and conducted a gray literature search. Title/abstract and full-text screening were completed in duplicate. Demographic information, reference standards, prevalence, and diagnostic accuracy measures were then extracted from included articles (PROSPERO CRD: CRD42016052120).
Across databases, 8,748 abstracts were generated after removing duplicates. Six hundred and sixty-five records underwent full-text screening, with six articles included for data extraction. Nine tools were identified compared to a reference standard, with multiple demonstrating a sensitivity of 100% (Brief Assessment Schedule Depression Cards, Beck Depression Inventory-II, Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia, Zung Self-Rated Depression Scale, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory). The second highest sensitivity reported was 89% (Patient Health Questionnaire-9). Too few studies were available for a meta-analysis.
Multiple depression detection tools have been examined amongst MCI outpatients, with several showing high sensitivity. However, this evidence is only present in single studies, with little demonstration of how differing MCI types affect accuracy. More research is needed to confirm the accuracy of these tools amongst persons with MCI. At this time, several tools could be suitable for use in cognitive clinics.
在轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者中,抑郁较为常见,总体有 32%(95%CI:27,37)的患者患有抑郁。与无抑郁的 MCI 患者相比,患有抑郁的 MCI 患者认知变化更多。为了了解如何在 MCI 患者中检测抑郁症状,我们进行了一项系统评价,以确定与参考标准相比得到验证的工具。
我们从建库到 2021 年 4 月 25 日在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane 数据库中进行检索,并进行了灰色文献检索。对标题/摘要和全文进行了重复筛选。然后从纳入的文章中提取人口统计学信息、参考标准、患病率和诊断准确性测量值(PROSPERO CRD:CRD42016052120)。
在去除重复项后,来自各个数据库的 8748 个摘要被生成。有 665 个记录经过全文筛选,其中 6 篇文章被纳入进行数据提取。有 9 种工具与参考标准进行了比较,其中多项工具的敏感性为 100%(简短评估量表抑郁卡片、贝克抑郁量表-II、康奈尔痴呆抑郁量表、zung 自评抑郁量表和神经精神病学问卷)。报告的第二高敏感性为 89%(患者健康问卷-9)。可用于进行荟萃分析的研究太少。
已经在 MCI 门诊患者中检查了多种抑郁检测工具,其中几种具有较高的敏感性。然而,这些证据仅存在于单一研究中,对于不同的 MCI 类型如何影响准确性的证据较少。需要更多的研究来确认这些工具在 MCI 患者中的准确性。目前,几种工具可能适合在认知诊所中使用。