• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用青少年暴力风险结构化评估(SAVRY)预测再犯罪:对中国湖南省男性少年犯的5年随访研究

Predicting Reoffending Using the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY): A 5-Year Follow-Up Study of Male Juvenile Offenders in Hunan Province, China.

作者信息

Zhou Jiansong, Witt Katrina, Cao Xia, Chen Chen, Wang Xiaoping

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry & Mental Health Institute of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders & National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders, Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0169251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169251. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169251
PMID:28076443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5226674/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Juvenile violent offending is a serious worldwide public health issue.

OBJECTIVE

The study examined whether the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) can be used to predict violent reoffending in Chinese male juvenile offenders, and to determine which risk/protective domains (items) are associated with violent recidivism.

METHODS

A total of 246 male juvenile offenders were recruited. SAVRY domains were scored by trained raters based on file review and interviews with participants and their legal guardians. Information on further arrests, charges, or convictions for violent offences were collected from police records over a five year follow-up.

RESULTS

Over the course of the five year follow-up periods, 63 (25.6%) juvenile offenders were re-arrested for a further violent reoffence. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses showed Areas Under the Curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 for the SAVRY total, risk and protective score domains. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that 7 of the 30 SAVRY items were significantly associated with reoffending; explaining 36.2% of the variance. Backward stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis showed the independently predictive items were items 2 ('history of non-violent offending'), 17 ('negative attitudes'), 18 ('risk-taking/impulsivity'), and 20 ('anger management problems'). Together these four items explained 25.0% of the variance in reoffending.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested that the SAVRY can be meaningfully used to inform the development and evaluation of effective violence risk assessment and management approaches for male juvenile offenders detained in a Youth Detention Center in Hunan province, China.

摘要

背景

青少年暴力犯罪是一个严重的全球性公共卫生问题。

目的

本研究探讨青少年暴力风险结构化评估(SAVRY)是否可用于预测中国男性青少年罪犯的暴力再犯情况,并确定哪些风险/保护领域(项目)与暴力累犯相关。

方法

共招募了246名男性青少年罪犯。由经过培训的评估人员根据档案审查以及与参与者及其法定监护人的访谈对SAVRY领域进行评分。在为期五年的随访中,从警方记录中收集有关进一步逮捕、指控或暴力犯罪定罪的信息。

结果

在五年随访期间,63名(25.6%)青少年罪犯因再次暴力犯罪而被重新逮捕。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析显示,SAVRY总分、风险和保护得分领域的曲线下面积(AUC)在0.60至0.68之间。单因素逻辑回归分析显示,30个SAVRY项目中有7个与再犯显著相关;解释了36.2%的方差。向后逐步多元逻辑回归分析显示,独立预测项目为项目2(“非暴力犯罪史”)、项目17(“消极态度”)、项目18(“冒险/冲动”)和项目20(“愤怒管理问题”)。这四个项目共同解释了再犯方差的25.0%。

结论

结果表明,SAVRY可有效地用于为中国湖南省青少年拘留中心被拘留的男性青少年罪犯制定和评估有效的暴力风险评估与管理方法提供参考。

相似文献

1
Predicting Reoffending Using the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY): A 5-Year Follow-Up Study of Male Juvenile Offenders in Hunan Province, China.使用青少年暴力风险结构化评估(SAVRY)预测再犯罪:对中国湖南省男性少年犯的5年随访研究
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0169251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169251. eCollection 2017.
2
Use of structured professional judgment by probation officers to assess risk for recidivism in adolescent offenders.缓刑监督官运用结构化专业判断来评估青少年罪犯再次犯罪的风险。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Jun;29(6):652-663. doi: 10.1037/pas0000414.
3
The impact of protective factors in desistance from violent reoffending: a study in three samples of adolescent offenders.保护因素对减少暴力再犯罪的影响:三个青少年罪犯样本的研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Mar;25(3):568-87. doi: 10.1177/0886260509334403. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
4
The Predictive Validity of Three Youth Violence Assessment Instruments: The SAVRY, VRS-YV, and SAPROF-YV.三种青少年暴力评估工具的预测效度:结构化青少年暴力风险评估工具(SAVRY)、青少年暴力风险量表(VRS - YV)和青少年暴力风险评估专业量表(SAPROF - YV)。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2022 Feb;66(2-3):168-185. doi: 10.1177/0306624X20970887. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
5
Predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth: A 4-year follow-up.青少年暴力风险结构化评估的预测效度:一项4年随访研究
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2015 Jul;25(3):192-206. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1921. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
6
Predictive validity of the SAVRY, YLS/CMI, and PCL:YV is poor for intimate partner violence perpetration among adolescent offenders.SAVRY、YLS/CMI 和 PCL:YV 对青少年罪犯实施亲密伴侣暴力的预测效度较差。
Law Hum Behav. 2022 Jun;46(3):189-200. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000483. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
7
Predictive validity of risk assessments in juvenile offenders: Comparing the SAVRY, PCL:YV, and YLS/CMI with unstructured clinical assessments.青少年罪犯风险评估的预测效度:将精算少年暴力风险评估工具(SAVRY)、青年版心理变态量表(PCL:YV)和青少年服务与案件管理清单(YLS/CMI)与非结构化临床评估进行比较
Assessment. 2014 Jun;21(3):324-39. doi: 10.1177/1073191113498113. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
8
Risk Assessment in Juvenile and Young Adult Offenders: Predictive Validity of the SAVRY and SAPROF-YV.青少年和年轻成年罪犯的风险评估:SAVRY 和 SAPROF-YV 的预测效度。
Assessment. 2022 Mar;29(2):181-197. doi: 10.1177/1073191120959740. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
9
Epidemiology of juvenile violence.青少年暴力的流行病学
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2000 Oct;9(4):733-48.
10
The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth as a predictor of recidivism in a United Kingdom cohort of adolescent offenders with conduct disorder.青少年暴力风险结构化评估作为英国一组患有品行障碍的青少年罪犯再犯率的预测指标。
Psychol Assess. 2008 Mar;20(1):35-46. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.1.35.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental Healthcare through Cognitive Emotional Regulation Strategies among Prisoners.通过认知情绪调节策略对囚犯进行心理保健
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 19;12(1):6. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010006.
2
Violence risk and personality assessment in adolescents by Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) and high school personality questionnaire (HSPQ): Focus on protective factors strengthening.青少年暴力风险与人格评估:采用青少年暴力风险结构化评估(SAVRY)和高中人格问卷(HSPQ),重点关注强化保护因素。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 10;13:1067450. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1067450. eCollection 2022.
3
The Predictive Validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth for Young Spanish Offenders.青少年暴力风险结构化评估对西班牙年轻罪犯的预测效度。
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 12;8:577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00577. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
The Predictive Validity of Savry Ratings for Assessing Youth Offenders in Singapore: A Comparison With YLS/CMI Ratings.新加坡萨夫里评估量表对青少年罪犯评估的预测效度:与青年司法筛选问卷/青少年犯罪多水平量表评估的比较
Crim Justice Behav. 2016 Jun;43(6):793-810. doi: 10.1177/0093854815616842. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
2
Psychiatric disorders and violent reoffending: a national cohort study of convicted prisoners in Sweden.精神疾病与暴力再犯罪:瑞典已定罪囚犯的全国队列研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;2(10):891-900. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00234-5. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
3
Violence risk assessment in psychiatric patients in China: A systematic review.中国精神科患者暴力风险评估:一项系统综述。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;50(1):33-45. doi: 10.1177/0004867415585580. Epub 2015 May 19.
4
Predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth: A 4-year follow-up.青少年暴力风险结构化评估的预测效度:一项4年随访研究
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2015 Jul;25(3):192-206. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1921. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
5
Predictive validity of risk assessments in juvenile offenders: Comparing the SAVRY, PCL:YV, and YLS/CMI with unstructured clinical assessments.青少年罪犯风险评估的预测效度:将精算少年暴力风险评估工具(SAVRY)、青年版心理变态量表(PCL:YV)和青少年服务与案件管理清单(YLS/CMI)与非结构化临床评估进行比较
Assessment. 2014 Jun;21(3):324-39. doi: 10.1177/1073191113498113. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
6
Examining the validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) for predicting probation outcomes among adjudicated juvenile offenders.探讨青少年暴力风险结构化评估量表(SAVRY)在预测被判决的少年犯缓刑结果方面的有效性。
Behav Sci Law. 2013 Mar-Apr;31(2):256-70. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2060. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
7
Predictive validity performance indicators in violence risk assessment: a methodological primer.预测效度在暴力风险评估中的表现指标:方法学入门。
Behav Sci Law. 2013 Jan-Feb;31(1):8-22. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2052. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
8
Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.1990年和2010年20个年龄组中235种死因的全球和区域死亡率:全球疾病负担研究2010的系统分析
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2095-128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0.
9
Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: systematic review and meta-analysis.使用风险评估工具预测 73 个样本中 24827 人的暴力和反社会行为:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2012 Jul 24;345:e4692. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4692.
10
The application of a violence risk assessment tool among Chinese psychiatric service users: a preliminary study.中文精神病服务使用者中暴力风险评估工具的应用:初步研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Jun;19(5):438-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01821.x. Epub 2011 Sep 25.