Zhou Shipeng, Rajput Amrapali P, Mao Tingru, Liu Yewei, Ellepola Gajaba, Herath Jayampathi, Yang Jian, Meegaskumbura Madhava
Eco-Evo-Devo Laboratory, Guangxi Key Laboratory in Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf, Nanning Normal University, Nanning, China.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 14;13:823254. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.823254. eCollection 2022.
The symbiosis between a host and its microbiome is essential for host fitness, and this association is a consequence of the host's physiology and habitat. , the largest cavefish diversification of the world, an emerging multi-species model system for evolutionary novelty, provides an excellent opportunity for examining correlates of host evolutionary history, habitat, and gut-microbial community diversity. From the diversification-scale patterns of habitat occupation, major phylogenetic clades (A-D), geographic distribution, and knowledge from captive-maintained populations, we hypothesize habitat to be the major determinant of microbiome diversity, with phylogeny playing a lesser role. For this, we subject environmental water samples and fecal samples (representative of gut-microbiome) from 24 species, both from the wild and after being in captivity for 6 months, to bacterial 16S rRNA gene profiling using Illumina sequencing. We see significant differences in the gut microbiota structure of , reflective of the three habitat types; gut microbiomes too, were influenced by host-related factors. There is no significant association between the gut microbiomes and host phylogeny. However, there is some microbiome related structure at the clade level, with the most geographically distant clades (A and D) being the most distinct, and the two overlapping clades (B and C) showing similarities. Microbes inhabiting water were not a cause for significant differences in fish-gut microbiota, but water quality parameters were. Transferring from wild to captivity, the fish microbiomes changed significantly and became homogenized, signifying plastic changes and highlighting the importance of environmental factors (habitat) in microbiome community assembly. The core microbiome of this group, at higher taxonomic scale, resembled that of other teleost fishes. Our results suggest that divergent natural environments giving rise to evolutionary novelties underlying host adaptations, also includes the microbiome of these fishes.
宿主与其微生物组之间的共生关系对宿主健康至关重要,这种关联是宿主生理和栖息地的结果。世界上最大的洞穴鱼多样化群体,一个新兴的用于研究进化新奇性的多物种模型系统,为研究宿主进化历史、栖息地和肠道微生物群落多样性的相关性提供了绝佳机会。从栖息地占据的多样化规模模式、主要系统发育分支(A - D)、地理分布以及圈养种群的相关知识来看,我们推测栖息地是微生物组多样性的主要决定因素,而系统发育的作用较小。为此,我们对来自24个物种的环境水样和粪便样本(代表肠道微生物组)进行研究,这些样本既有野生的,也有圈养6个月后的,使用Illumina测序对细菌16S rRNA基因进行分析。我们发现,反映三种栖息地类型的肠道微生物群结构存在显著差异;肠道微生物组也受到宿主相关因素的影响。肠道微生物组与宿主系统发育之间没有显著关联。然而,在分支水平上存在一些与微生物组相关的结构,地理距离最远的分支(A和D)最为独特,而两个重叠的分支(B和C)表现出相似性。栖息在水中的微生物不是鱼类肠道微生物群显著差异的原因,但水质参数是。从野生环境转移到圈养环境后,鱼类微生物组发生了显著变化并趋于同质化,这表明存在可塑性变化,并突出了环境因素(栖息地)在微生物群落组装中的重要性。在较高分类尺度上,该群体的核心微生物组与其他硬骨鱼类相似。我们的结果表明,导致宿主适应背后进化新奇性的不同自然环境,也包括这些鱼类的微生物组。