Cheng Wenwen, Yang Yan, Chen Ying, Shan Sharui, Li Changhui, Fang Ling, Zhang Weiguo, Lan Song, Zhang Xiong
Department of Neurology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Department of Ideological and Political Theory Teaching, Maoming Polytechnic, Maoming, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 10;13:821639. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.821639. eCollection 2022.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Anti-Seizure medication (ASM) treatment in patients with BECTS. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG DATA, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) between 1 Jan 1990, and 1 Sep 2021, for randomized controlled studies. Data on seizure freedom rate, rate of treatment withdrawal due to serious adverse events, rate of any adverse events and dropout, 50% remission rate, the proportion of patients whose EEG to be normalized, and improvement in cognitive function were extracted by two authors independently. The pooled data were meta-analyzed using a random effects model. A total of 27 studies evaluating 9 ASMs were included, 19 of which were suitable for meta-analysis. Compared with sulthiame (STM), levetiracetam (LEV) was associated with a higher probability of treatment withdrawal due to serious adverse events [RR = 5.12, 95% CI (1.19, 22.01), = 0.0%], experiencing any adverse events [RR = 5.12, 95% CI (1.19, 22.01)], and dropping out for any reason [RR = 3.17, 95% CI (1.36, 10.11)], while it did not affect the seizure freedom rate [RR = 0.90, 95% CI (0.75, 1.06)]. LEV significantly improved cognitive performance relative to carbamazepine (CBZ) but had no effect on the proportion of any adverse events [RR = 0.62, 95% CI (0.25, 1.59)] and EEG to be normalized [RR = 1.27, 95% CI (0.94, 1.71)]. There was no higher probability of a 50% remission rate when comparing valproic acid (VPA) to LEV [RR = 0.96, 95% CI (0.57, 1.61)] and oxcarbazepine (OXC) [RR = 0.61, 95% CI (0.31, 1.20)]. In addition, STM was related to a higher probability of EEG normalization than placebo [RR = 4.61, 95% CI (2.12, 10.01)]. The included single studies also provided some evidence for the efficacy and/or tolerability of other ASMs in BECTS, including topiramate, lamotrigine, clobazam, and clonazepam. The risk of bias of the included studies was frequently low or unclear. This study indicated some discrepancies in efficacy and tolerability among ASMs used in patients with BECTS. More randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ASMs with larger populations are required to ascertain the optimum antiepileptic drug treatment to guide clinicians.
本研究旨在评估抗癫痫药物(ASM)治疗儿童良性癫痫伴中央颞区棘波(BECTS)患者的疗效和耐受性。我们检索了1990年1月1日至2021年9月1日期间的PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、MEDLINE、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据和维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP),以查找随机对照研究。两位作者独立提取了癫痫发作缓解率、因严重不良事件导致的治疗停药率、任何不良事件和退出率、50%缓解率、脑电图正常化患者的比例以及认知功能改善的数据。使用随机效应模型对汇总数据进行荟萃分析。共纳入了评估9种ASM的27项研究,其中19项适合进行荟萃分析。与舒噻美(STM)相比,左乙拉西坦(LEV)因严重不良事件导致治疗停药的概率更高[风险比率(RR)=5.12,95%置信区间(CI)(1.19,22.01),P = 0.0%],发生任何不良事件的概率更高[RR = 5.12,95% CI(1.19,22.01)],以及因任何原因退出的概率更高[RR = 3.17,95% CI(1.36,10.11)],而它不影响癫痫发作缓解率[RR = 0.90,95% CI(0.75,1.06)]。相对于卡马西平(CBZ),LEV显著改善了认知表现,但对任何不良事件的比例[RR = 0.62,95% CI(0.25,1.59)]和脑电图正常化没有影响[RR = 1.27,95% CI(0.94,1.71)]。与LEV相比,丙戊酸(VPA)[RR = 0.96,95% CI(0.57,1.61)]和奥卡西平(OXC)[RR = 0.61,95% CI(0.31,1.20)]的50%缓解率没有更高的概率。此外,STM与脑电图正常化的概率高于安慰剂相关[RR = 4.61,95% CI(2.12,10.01)]。纳入的单项研究也为其他ASM在BECTS中的疗效和/或耐受性提供了一些证据,包括托吡酯、拉莫三嗪、氯巴占和氯硝西泮。纳入研究的偏倚风险通常较低或不明确。本研究表明,用于BECTS患者的ASM在疗效和耐受性方面存在一些差异。需要更多比较ASM且样本量更大的随机对照试验(RCT)来确定最佳抗癫痫药物治疗方案,以指导临床医生。