• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The value of qualitative methods to public health research, policy and practice.定性方法对公共卫生研究、政策和实践的价值。
Perspect Public Health. 2022 Jul;142(4):237-240. doi: 10.1177/17579139221083814. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
2
Health policy and systems research publications in Latin America warrant the launching of a new specialised regional journal.拉丁美洲的卫生政策和体系研究出版物需要推出一份新的专门的区域期刊。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jun 5;18(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00565-1.
3
Paucity of qualitative research in general medical and health services and policy research journals: analysis of publication rates.一般医学和卫生服务及政策研究期刊中定性研究的匮乏：出版率分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 12;11:268. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-268.
4
Why the (QHR) Review Process Does Not Use Checklists.为什么（QHR）审查过程不使用清单。
Qual Health Res. 2021 Apr;31(5):819-821. doi: 10.1177/1049732321994114.
5
Dilemmas in publishing qualitative public health research.定性公共卫生研究发表中的困境。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007 Jun;31(3):203-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00047.x.
6
Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.掠夺性期刊时代学术作者的最佳实践。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(2):77-9. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0056.
7
A quantitative analysis of qualitative studies in clinical journals for the 2000 publishing year.2000年出版年份临床期刊中定性研究的定量分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2004 Jul 22;4:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-4-11.
8
Publishing in Predatory Journals: Guidelines for Nursing Faculty in Promotion and Tenure Policies.发表掠夺性期刊论文：护理教师晋升和终身教职政策指南。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2021 Nov;53(6):746-752. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12696. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
9
Challenges for publishing Brazilian scientific health journals.巴西科学健康期刊出版面临的挑战。
Cien Saude Colet. 2019 Mar;24(3):929-939. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018243.29952016.
10
Open access publishing: a study of current practices in orthopaedic research.开放获取出版：骨科研究现状研究。
Int Orthop. 2014 Jun;38(6):1297-302. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2250-5. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative evaluation of a partnership between a local authority and community organisations to improve mental health and wellbeing.对地方当局与社区组织之间旨在改善心理健康和幸福感的伙伴关系进行的定性评估。
Discov Public Health. 2025;22(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s12982-025-00875-1. Epub 2025 Aug 14.
2
Exploring the functional quality attributes of smart home for older adults based on qualitative research and Kano model.基于定性研究和卡诺模型探索老年人智能家居的功能质量属性
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 8;13:1541571. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1541571. eCollection 2025.
3
AI in Qualitative Health Research Appraisal: Comparative Study.人工智能在定性健康研究评估中的应用：比较研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 8;9:e72815. doi: 10.2196/72815.
4
Stress, Health, and Injury Among Illinois Farmers.伊利诺伊州农民的压力、健康与伤害
Am J Ind Med. 2025 Sep;68(9):761-771. doi: 10.1002/ajim.70000. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
5
Practical qualitative data analysis for public health research: a guide to a team-based approach with flexible coding.公共卫生研究中的实用定性数据分析：基于团队的灵活编码方法指南
Int J Qual Methods. 2024 Jan-Dec;23. doi: 10.1177/16094069241289279. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
6
Academic and clinical perspectives of metagenome sequencing as a diagnostic tool for infectious disease: an interpretive phenomenological study.宏基因组测序作为传染病诊断工具的学术与临床视角：一项解释现象学研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10820-x.
7
Breaking the chain from the chair: a manager's perspective on reducing employees sedentary time in a home-office context.打破久坐的链条：管理者对减少居家办公员工久坐时间的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 20;25(1):1079. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22184-7.
8
Latine Immigrant Perspectives on Trust of Clinical Research.拉丁裔移民对临床研究信任度的看法。
Hisp Health Care Int. 2024 Oct 3:15404153241286745. doi: 10.1177/15404153241286745.
9
A systematic mapping of public health master's and structured doctoral programs in Germany.德国公共卫生硕士和结构化博士课程的系统制图。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 13;24(1):872. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05855-8.
10
The "what, why, and how?" of story completion in health services research: a scoping review.健康服务研究中故事完成的“是什么、为什么和如何”：范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jul 23;24(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02274-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Teaching young consumers in Europe: a multicentre qualitative needs assessment with educators on food hygiene and food safety.在欧洲对年轻消费者进行教学：对食品卫生和食品安全教育者进行的多中心定性需求评估。
Perspect Public Health. 2022 May;142(3):175-183. doi: 10.1177/1757913920972739. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
2
A qualitative study of men's behavioural changes during weight loss maintenance.一项关于男性在减肥维持期间行为变化的定性研究。
Perspect Public Health. 2020 Nov;140(6):317-326. doi: 10.1177/1757913920964516.
3
An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research.致《英国医学杂志》编辑的一封关于定性研究的公开信。
BMJ. 2016 Feb 10;352:i563. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i563.
4
Qualitative research and The BMJ.定性研究与《英国医学杂志》
BMJ. 2016 Feb 10;352:i641. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i641.
5
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.报告定性研究的标准：建议的综合。
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
6
Qualitative research and its uses in health care.定性研究及其在医疗保健中的应用。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2008 Mar;8(1):11-9.
7
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.定性研究报告的统一标准（COREQ）：访谈和焦点小组的32项清单
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
8
Qualitative research and evidence based medicine.定性研究与循证医学
BMJ. 1998 Apr 18;316(7139):1230-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1230.

定性方法对公共卫生研究、政策和实践的价值。

The value of qualitative methods to public health research, policy and practice.

机构信息

Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Triumph Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.

The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Perspect Public Health. 2022 Jul;142(4):237-240. doi: 10.1177/17579139221083814. Epub 2022 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1177/17579139221083814
PMID:35362352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9446427/
Abstract

This article reviews the role and use of qualitative methods in public health research.'Signs of quality' are introduced to help guide potential authors to publish their qualitative research in public health journals. We conclude that high-quality qualitative research offers insights that quantitative research cannot. It is time for all public health journals to recognise the value of qualitative research and increase the amount that they publish.

摘要

本文回顾了定性方法在公共卫生研究中的作用和应用。引入了“质量标志”来帮助指导潜在作者在公共卫生期刊上发表他们的定性研究。我们得出结论，高质量的定性研究提供了定量研究无法提供的见解。现在是所有公共卫生期刊都认识到定性研究的价值并增加其发表数量的时候了。