Merrill Palmer Skillman Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Egan School of Nursing and Health Studies, Fairfield University, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA.
Infant Ment Health J. 2022 Mar;43(2):203-206. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21976. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
The definition and implementation of reflective supervision/consultation (RS/C) in the infant early childhood mental health field (IECMH) has largely been driven by expert supervisors, researchers, and leaders in the field. The voice of the frontline practitioner, the most likely recipient of RS/C has had less prominence in the scholarly discourse, leaving unclear supervisees' perspectives on the meaning and value of RS/C. This special section addresses supervisees' experiences with RS/C across five studies. In the first two papers, researchers examined supervisees' perspectives on essential components of RS/C and perceived impacts of RS/C on their work. In paper 3, researchers report on perceived associations between RS/C and professionals' well-being. The fourth paper addresses experiences in RS/C and professionals' use of reflective practices. Finally, researchers in the fifth paper present the psychometric properties of an observational tool that focuses on the interaction between supervisors and supervisees. Collectively, the studies promote understanding about supervisees' perspectives and experiences that may benefit future research studies aimed at investigating the role of RS/C in well-being and practice and provide information for program administrators considering the inclusion of RS/C in professional development efforts.
在婴幼儿心理健康领域(IECMH),反思性监督/咨询(RS/C)的定义和实施在很大程度上是由该领域的专家监督者、研究人员和领导者推动的。一线从业者(最有可能接受 RS/C 的人)的声音在学术讨论中没有那么突出,因此不清楚 RS/C 对监督者的意义和价值。本特刊通过五项研究探讨了监督者对 RS/C 的体验。在前两篇论文中,研究人员研究了监督者对 RS/C 基本组成部分的看法以及他们对 RS/C 对工作影响的看法。在第 3 篇论文中,研究人员报告了 RS/C 与专业人员的幸福感之间的感知关联。第 4 篇论文探讨了 RS/C 经历和专业人员使用反思实践之间的关系。最后,第五篇论文的研究人员介绍了一种关注监督者和监督者之间互动的观察工具的心理计量学特性。总的来说,这些研究增进了对监督者观点和经验的理解,这可能有助于未来旨在调查 RS/C 在幸福感和实践中的作用的研究,并为考虑将 RS/C 纳入专业发展努力的项目管理人员提供信息。