• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反思性监督和咨询及其对儿童服务项目的影响:系统评价。

Reflective supervision and consultation and its impact within early childhood-serving programs: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Bradley/Hasbro Children's Research Center, E.P. Bradley Hospital, East Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

Infant Ment Health J. 2023 Nov;44(6):803-836. doi: 10.1002/imhj.22079. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1002/imhj.22079
PMID:37537782
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10837315/
Abstract

Reflective supervision and consultation (RS/C) is regarded as best practice within the infant/early childhood mental health field. Benefits of RS/C on the early childhood workforce and children and families have been demonstrated through case studies, conceptual pieces, and individual research studies. However, findings across studies have not been summarized using gold-standard methodology, thus the state of existing empirical support for RS/C is unclear. This systematic review examined the collective evidence for RS/C across diverse early childhood-serving programs. Electronic databases were searched to identify studies investigating associations between RS/C and professionals' reflective capacity and well-being, child/family outcomes, and implementation factors. Twenty-eight papers were identified. Studies showed positive associations between RS/C and early childhood-serving professionals' reflective capacity and well-being, with qualitative studies reporting more consistent results than studies using quantitative methods. Many methodological limitations were identified, including incomplete reporting of study designs and participant characteristics, variability in outcome measures, and lack of randomization and comparison groups. Furthermore, few studies examined child and family outcomes. Therefore, while RS/C shows great promise, it was difficult to ascertain its overall effectiveness from an empirical standpoint. Establishing RS/C as an empirically supported approach will be possible with more rigorous research.

摘要

反思性监督和咨询 (RS/C) 在婴幼儿心理健康领域被视为最佳实践。通过案例研究、概念性文章和个体研究,已经证明了 RS/C 对幼儿劳动力以及儿童和家庭的益处。然而,由于没有使用黄金标准方法对研究结果进行总结,因此,RS/C 的现有实证支持的状况尚不清楚。本系统评价审查了跨不同幼儿服务项目的 RS/C 的综合证据。通过电子数据库搜索,确定了调查 RS/C 与专业人员的反思能力和幸福感、儿童/家庭结果以及实施因素之间关联的研究。确定了 28 篇论文。研究表明,RS/C 与幼儿服务专业人员的反思能力和幸福感之间存在积极关联,定性研究报告的结果比使用定量方法的研究更为一致。确定了许多方法学上的局限性,包括研究设计和参与者特征的报告不完整、结果衡量标准的差异,以及缺乏随机化和对照组。此外,很少有研究检查儿童和家庭的结果。因此,虽然 RS/C 显示出很大的前景,但从实证角度来看,很难确定其整体效果。通过更严格的研究,可以确定 RS/C 作为一种经验支持方法的有效性。

相似文献

1
Reflective supervision and consultation and its impact within early childhood-serving programs: A systematic review.反思性监督和咨询及其对儿童服务项目的影响:系统评价。
Infant Ment Health J. 2023 Nov;44(6):803-836. doi: 10.1002/imhj.22079. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
Building reflective capacity and improving well-being of early childhood professionals through an embedded cross-system model of infant early childhood mental health consultation.通过嵌入式婴幼儿早期心理健康咨询跨系统模型,提升幼儿教育工作者的反思能力和幸福感。
Infant Ment Health J. 2022 Nov;43(6):878-898. doi: 10.1002/imhj.22020. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
3
From the voices of supervisees: A theoretical model of reflective supervision (Part II).从被督导者的声音中看:反思性督导的理论模型(第二部分)。
Infant Ment Health J. 2022 Mar;43(2):226-241. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21975. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
4
From the voices of supervisees: What is reflective supervision and how does it support their work? (Part I).来自被督导者的声音:什么是反思性督导,它如何支持他们的工作?(第一部分)
Infant Ment Health J. 2022 Mar;43(2):207-225. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21972. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
5
Our way of being: Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health workforce development in Tennessee.我们的方式:田纳西州婴幼儿心理健康工作队伍的发展。
Infant Ment Health J. 2021 Nov;42(6):851-866. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21943. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
6
Updating the evidence: A systematic review of a decade of Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation (IECMHC) research.更新证据:对十年来婴儿和幼儿心理健康咨询(IECMHC)研究的系统回顾。
Infant Ment Health J. 2023 Jan;44(1):5-26. doi: 10.1002/imhj.22033. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Taking care of the caregivers: The moderating role of reflective supervision in the relationship between COVID-19 stress and the mental and professional well-being of the IECMH workforce.关爱照护者:反思性监督在 COVID-19 压力与儿童早期心理健康和家庭支持服务(IECMH)工作者的心理和专业福祉之间关系中的调节作用。
Infant Ment Health J. 2022 Jan;43(1):55-68. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21956. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Effectiveness and experiences of families and support workers participating in peer-led parenting support programs delivered as home visiting programs: a comprehensive systematic review.家庭和支持工作者参与以同伴为主导的育儿支持项目(作为家访项目开展)的有效性和经验:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Oct;14(10):167-208. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003166.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Reflective Supervision Professional Development Series Within Early Care and Education.早期护理与教育中反思性督导专业发展系列的可行性、可接受性及初步有效性
Early Educ Dev. 2025;36(5):967-990. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2024.2424733. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
2
Observational Video Study of Maternal Sleep During the 24 Hours Before Hospital Discharge After Childbirth.产后出院前24小时产妇睡眠的观察性视频研究
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2025.04.005.
3
One state's journey with a reflective supervision professional development series: Development, implementation, and adaptation.

本文引用的文献

1
From the voices of supervisees: A theoretical model of reflective supervision (Part II).从被督导者的声音中看:反思性督导的理论模型(第二部分)。
Infant Ment Health J. 2022 Mar;43(2):226-241. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21975. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
2
The implementation of a multi-level reflective consultation model in a statewide infant & early childcare education professional development system: Evaluation of a pilot.在全州范围内的婴幼儿及早期儿童保育教育专业发展系统中实施多层次反思性咨询模型:一项试点评估。
Infant Ment Health J. 2022 Mar;43(2):266-286. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21973. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
3
From the voices of supervisees: What is reflective supervision and how does it support their work? (Part I).
一个州在反思性督导专业发展系列方面的历程:发展、实施与调整。
Infant Ment Health J. 2025 May;46(3):328-342. doi: 10.1002/imhj.22165. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
4
"It's Like Making Reflective Practice More of the Heart of Who We Are": An Exploration of Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing Reflective Supervision in State Pre-K.“这就像是让反思性实践更成为我们自身的核心”:对在州立学前教育项目中实施反思性督导的促进因素与障碍的探究
Prev Sci. 2024 Dec;25(8):1262-1274. doi: 10.1007/s11121-024-01744-0. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
来自被督导者的声音:什么是反思性督导,它如何支持他们的工作?(第一部分)
Infant Ment Health J. 2022 Mar;43(2):207-225. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21972. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
4
Professional quality of life in home visitors: Core components of the reflective supervisory relationship and IMH-E Endorsement engagement.家庭访视员的专业生活质量:反思监督关系的核心要素和 IMH-E 认可参与。
Infant Ment Health J. 2022 Mar;43(2):242-255. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21970. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
5
Taking care of the caregivers: The moderating role of reflective supervision in the relationship between COVID-19 stress and the mental and professional well-being of the IECMH workforce.关爱照护者:反思性监督在 COVID-19 压力与儿童早期心理健康和家庭支持服务(IECMH)工作者的心理和专业福祉之间关系中的调节作用。
Infant Ment Health J. 2022 Jan;43(1):55-68. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21956. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
6
Measuring the depth of reflection in reflective supervision/consultation sessions: Initial validation of the Reflective Interaction Observation Scale (RIOS).测量反思性督导/咨询会议中的反思深度:反思互动观察量表(RIOS)的初步验证
Infant Ment Health J. 2022 Mar;43(2):256-265. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21939. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
8
Factors influencing access to early intervention for families of children with developmental disabilities: A narrative review.影响发展障碍儿童家庭获得早期干预服务的因素:叙事性综述。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 May;34(3):695-711. doi: 10.1111/jar.12852. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
9
Increasing child protection workforce retention through promoting a relational-reflective framework for resilience.通过促进弹性的关系反思框架来提高儿童保护工作者的留存率。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Dec;110(Pt 3):104245. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104245. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
10
Infant mental health home visiting therapists' reflective supervision self-efficacy in community practice settings.社区实践环境中婴儿心理健康家访治疗师的反思性监督自我效能感。
Infant Ment Health J. 2020 Mar;41(2):191-205. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21834. Epub 2019 Nov 22.