Suppr超能文献

关节外外侧联合固定术与前交叉韧带重建术:骨关节炎风险。

Combined lateral extra-articular tenodesis and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: risk of osteoarthritis.

机构信息

Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600, Genk, Belgium.

Universiteit Gent, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 25, 9000, Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):1075-1082. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03249-4. Epub 2022 Apr 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure, combined with an intra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), is used to reduce rotational laxity and the risk of graft failure. However, concern of overtightening of the lateral compartment and subsequent osteoarthritis remains. The aim of this study is to evaluate the degenerative changes in the lateral compartment and to compare the clinical and radiographical results between two LET techniques.

METHODS

Eighty-three patients (86 knees) were retrospectively reviewed at a mean of 67.7 months (range 49-85 months). Forty-two knees had an ACL reconstruction combined with a LET procedure according to the modified Lemaire technique and 44 knees according to the modified Coker-Arnold technique. IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner and VAS scores were used. Osteoarthritis was radiographically evaluated by the Kellgren-Lawrence classification.

RESULTS

There were 12 patients (28.6%) in the modified Lemaire subgroup and 13 patients (29.5%) in the modified Coker-Arnold subgroup that had doubtful or mild radiologic signs of osteoarthritis. No patients had moderate or severe signs at final follow-up. There was no significant difference in radiological signs of osteoarthritis. In the modified Lemaire subgroup, we report a mean IKDC of 86.31 (± 13.794), a mean Lysholm of 87.83 (± 12.802) and a mean Tegner of 5.38 (± 2.556). In the modified Coker-Arnold subgroup, a mean IKDC of 87.27 (± 11.653), a mean Lysholm of 91.89 (± 8.035) and a mean Tegner of 5.16 (± 2.420) were reported. There were no statistical significant differences between both techniques. In eight patients, a complication was identified, 3 of which had a failure of the ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

The chosen LET-technique seems to have minimal effect on both the clinical and the radiographic results. The LET is a safe procedure, and it does not increase the risk of osteoarthritis in the lateral compartment.

摘要

目的

外侧关节外腱固定术(LET)与前交叉韧带(ACL)的关节内重建相结合,用于减少旋转松弛和移植物失败的风险。然而,人们仍然担心外侧间隔过度收紧和随后发生骨关节炎。本研究的目的是评估外侧间隔的退行性变化,并比较两种 LET 技术的临床和影像学结果。

方法

回顾性分析了 83 例(86 膝)患者,平均随访时间为 67.7 个月(范围 49-85 个月)。42 例膝关节采用改良 Lemaire 技术行 ACL 重建联合 LET 术,44 例膝关节采用改良 Coker-Arnold 技术行 ACL 重建联合 LET 术。采用 IKDC、Lysholm、Tegner 和 VAS 评分进行评估。采用 Kellgren-Lawrence 分级对骨关节炎进行放射学评估。

结果

改良 Lemaire 亚组中有 12 例(28.6%)患者和改良 Coker-Arnold 亚组中有 13 例(29.5%)患者存在可疑或轻度放射学骨关节炎征象。末次随访时,无患者出现中度或重度征象。影像学骨关节炎征象无显著差异。在改良 Lemaire 亚组中,我们报告平均 IKDC 为 86.31(±13.794),平均 Lysholm 为 87.83(±12.802),平均 Tegner 为 5.38(±2.556)。在改良 Coker-Arnold 亚组中,平均 IKDC 为 87.27(±11.653),平均 Lysholm 为 91.89(±8.035),平均 Tegner 为 5.16(±2.420)。两种技术之间无统计学差异。有 8 例患者出现并发症,其中 3 例为 ACL 重建失败。

结论

所选 LET 技术似乎对临床和影像学结果的影响最小。LET 是一种安全的手术,不会增加外侧间隔骨关节炎的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验