Department of Orthopedics, Buddhachinaraj Hospital, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering at Sriracha, Kasetsart University, Sriracha, Chonburi, Thailand.
Musculoskelet Surg. 2023 Jun;107(2):207-221. doi: 10.1007/s12306-022-00743-0. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
Establishing fracture union of low and comminuted intercondylar fractures of the humerus is inherently challenging. The purposes of the present study were to investigate the biomechanical effectiveness of pin & plate (PP) fixation compared to other dual-plating techniques by finite element analysis, and to present a technical description as well as retrospectively review the outcomes of PP fixation in such difficult fractures.
Low-level intercondylar fracture 3D models of the humerus were virtually stabilized with three fixations on lateral side including PP, lateral pre-contoured locking compression plate (L-LCP), and variable angle lateral pre-contoured locking plate (VA-L-LCP) whereas medial pre-contoured locking compression plate (M-LCP) on medial side. Loading conditions under consideration were axial compression, internal rotation, posterior bending, and valgus rotation. Regarding the clinical series, eight patients with intra-articular and comminuted fractures of the distal humerus (6 intercondylar fractures, 1 fracture-subluxation, and 1 isolated lateral condylar fracture) were operated by isolated PP fixation or combinations of PP and the other standard implants. Data were collected on fracture union, perioperative complications, and objective clinical outcomes.
Biomechanical results revealed the most instability of the fracture occurring under posterior bending. PP fixation presented comparable fracture stability and fragment displacement compared to other dual-plating fixations, except stress on the Kirschner wire under internal rotation which was higher than other fixations. Regarding the clinical series, fracture union was achieved in all cases with an average union time of 17 weeks (range 12-20). All except one patient had good-to-excellent MEPS results with an average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score of 14.6 (range 0-45) and an average arc of elbow motion of 107.5 degrees (range 60-140).
By the biomechanical performance, PP fixation is a reliable technique for fixation of low intercondylar fractures of the humerus. Supported by the clinical outcomes, the present technique could be an alternative for this particular fracture especially when severe comminution prevents the use of the standard dual plating technique.
肱骨髁间低粉碎性骨折的骨折愈合本身具有挑战性。本研究的目的是通过有限元分析研究销钉和钢板(PP)固定与其他双钢板技术相比的生物力学效果,并介绍一种技术描述以及回顾性分析 PP 固定治疗此类困难骨折的结果。
对肱骨髁间低水平骨折 3D 模型的外侧进行虚拟固定,包括 PP、外侧预弯锁定加压钢板(L-LCP)和可变角度外侧预弯锁定钢板(VA-L-LCP),内侧使用预弯锁定加压钢板(M-LCP)。考虑的加载条件包括轴向压缩、内旋、后弯和外翻旋转。关于临床系列,8 例患者(6 例髁间骨折、1 例骨折半脱位和 1 例单独外侧髁骨折)采用单独 PP 固定或 PP 与其他标准植入物联合固定治疗关节内和粉碎性肱骨远端骨折。收集骨折愈合、围手术期并发症和客观临床结果的数据。
生物力学结果显示,后弯时骨折最不稳定。PP 固定与其他双钢板固定相比,骨折稳定性和骨折块移位相似,但内旋时克氏针的应力高于其他固定方式。关于临床系列,所有病例均达到骨折愈合,平均愈合时间为 17 周(范围 12-20 周)。除 1 例外,所有患者的 MEPS 结果均良好至优秀,平均上肢功能障碍评分(DASH)为 14.6(范围 0-45),平均肘部活动弧为 107.5 度(范围 60-140)。
从生物力学性能来看,PP 固定是治疗肱骨髁间低水平骨折的可靠技术。临床结果支持该技术可作为治疗此类特定骨折的替代方法,特别是在严重粉碎性骨折妨碍使用标准双钢板技术时。