• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对住院重症患者记录的目标关怀讨论的沟通启动干预的效果:一项随机临床试验。

Efficacy of a Communication-Priming Intervention on Documented Goals-of-Care Discussions in Hospitalized Patients With Serious Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e225088. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5088.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5088
PMID:35363271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8976242/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

High-quality goals-of-care communication is critical to delivering goal-concordant, patient-centered care to hospitalized patients with chronic life-limiting illness. However, implementation and documentation of goals-of-care discussions remain important shortcomings in many health systems.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of a patient-facing and clinician-facing communication-priming intervention to promote goals-of-care communication for patients hospitalized with serious illness.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients from November 6, 2018, to February 18, 2020. The setting was 2 hospitals in an academic health care system in Seattle, Washington. Participants included hospitalized adults with chronic life-limiting illness, aged 65 years or older and with markers of frailty, or aged 80 years or older. Data analysis was performed from August 2020 to August 2021.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to usual care with baseline questionnaires (control) vs the Jumpstart communication-priming intervention. Patients or surrogates in the intervention group and their clinicians received patient-specific Jumpstart Guides populated with data from questionnaires and the electronic health records (EHRs) that were designed to prompt and guide a goals-of-care discussion.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was EHR documentation of a goals-of-care discussion between randomization and hospital discharge. Additional outcomes included patient-reported or surrogate-reported goals-of-care discussions, patient-reported or surrogate-reported quality of communication, and intervention feasibility and acceptability.

RESULTS

Of 428 eligible patients, this study enrolled 150 patients (35% enrollment rate; mean [SD] age, 59.2 [13.6] years; 66 women [44%]; 132 [88%] by patient consent and 18 [12%] by surrogate consent). Seventy-five patients each were randomized to the intervention and control groups. Compared with the control group, the cumulative incidence of EHR-documented goals-of-care discussions between randomization and hospital discharge was higher in the intervention group (16 of 75 patients [21%] vs 6 of 75 patients [8%]; risk difference, 13% [95% CI, 2%-24%]; risk ratio, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.10-6.44]; P = .04). Patient-reported or surrogate-reported goals-of-care discussions did not differ significantly between groups (30 of 66 patients [45%] vs 36 of 66 patients [55%]), although the intrarater consistency of patient and surrogate reports was poor. Patient-rated or surrogate-rated quality of communication did not differ significantly between groups. The intervention was feasible and acceptable to patients, surrogates, and clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, a patient-facing and clinician-facing communication priming intervention for seriously ill, hospitalized patients promoted EHR-documented goals-of-care discussions before discharge with good feasibility and acceptability. Communication-priming interventions should be reexamined in a larger randomized clinical trial to better understand their effectiveness in the inpatient setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03746392.

摘要

重要性

高质量的临终关怀沟通对于为患有慢性生命终末期疾病的住院患者提供一致的、以患者为中心的护理至关重要。然而,在许多医疗系统中,目标关怀讨论的实施和记录仍然是一个重要的缺点。

目的

评估一种面向患者和面向临床医生的沟通启动干预措施在促进因严重疾病住院的患者进行目标关怀沟通方面的效果、可行性和可接受性。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项随机临床试验,于 2018 年 11 月 6 日至 2020 年 2 月 18 日期间在华盛顿州西雅图的一家学术医疗保健系统中的 2 家医院进行。参与者包括患有慢性生命终末期疾病、年龄在 65 岁及以上且有脆弱性标志物或年龄在 80 岁及以上的住院成年人。数据分析于 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 8 月进行。

干预措施

患者被随机分配至接受常规护理(对照组)或 Jumpstart 沟通启动干预措施。干预组的患者或代理人及其临床医生收到了个性化的 Jumpstart 指南,这些指南使用问卷和电子健康记录(EHR)中的数据进行填充,旨在提示和指导目标关怀讨论。

主要结果和测量

主要结局是在随机分组和出院之间,EHR 记录的目标关怀讨论。其他结局包括患者或代理人报告的目标关怀讨论、患者或代理人报告的沟通质量,以及干预措施的可行性和可接受性。

结果

在 428 名符合条件的患者中,本研究纳入了 150 名患者(35%的入组率;平均[标准差]年龄为 59.2[13.6]岁;66 名女性[44%];132 名患者[88%]由患者同意,18 名患者[12%]由代理人同意)。每组随机分配了 75 名患者。与对照组相比,干预组在随机分组和出院之间,EHR 记录的目标关怀讨论的累积发生率更高(75 名患者中有 16 名[21%] vs 75 名患者中有 6 名[8%];风险差异,13%[95%CI,2%-24%];风险比,2.67[95%CI,1.10-6.44];P=0.04)。患者或代理人报告的目标关怀讨论在两组之间没有显著差异(66 名患者中有 30 名[45%] vs 66 名患者中有 36 名[55%]),尽管患者和代理人的报告内在一致性较差。患者或代理人评定的沟通质量在两组之间没有显著差异。该干预措施对患者、代理人和临床医生来说是可行和可接受的。

结论和相关性

在这项随机临床试验中,一种面向患者和面向临床医生的沟通启动干预措施促进了因严重疾病住院的患者在出院前进行 EHR 记录的目标关怀讨论,具有良好的可行性和可接受性。沟通启动干预措施应在更大的随机临床试验中重新评估,以更好地了解其在住院环境中的有效性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03746392。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d225/8976242/c9b6e9b6d400/jamanetwopen-e225088-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d225/8976242/c9b6e9b6d400/jamanetwopen-e225088-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d225/8976242/c9b6e9b6d400/jamanetwopen-e225088-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of a Communication-Priming Intervention on Documented Goals-of-Care Discussions in Hospitalized Patients With Serious Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一项针对住院重症患者记录的目标关怀讨论的沟通启动干预的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e225088. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5088.
2
Intervention to Promote Communication About Goals of Care for Hospitalized Patients With Serious Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial.促进与住院重症患者进行治疗目标沟通的干预措施:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Jun 20;329(23):2028-2037. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.8812.
3
Effect of a Patient and Clinician Communication-Priming Intervention on Patient-Reported Goals-of-Care Discussions Between Patients With Serious Illness and Clinicians: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者和临床医生沟通启动干预对严重疾病患者和临床医生之间患者报告的治疗目标讨论的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jul 1;178(7):930-940. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2317.
4
Improving communication about goals of care for hospitalized patients with serious illness: Study protocol for two complementary randomized trials.改善对患有严重疾病的住院患者的关怀目标沟通:两项互补随机试验的研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Sep;120:106879. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106879. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
5
6
Effectiveness of a Nurse-Led Multidisciplinary Intervention vs Usual Care on Advance Care Planning for Vulnerable Older Adults in an Accountable Care Organization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.护士主导的多学科干预与常规护理对问责制医疗组织中脆弱老年人的预先护理计划的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;181(3):361-369. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5950.
7
Evaluating an Intervention to Improve Communication Between Oncology Clinicians and Patients With Life-Limiting Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of the Serious Illness Care Program.评估一项改善肿瘤临床医生与生命末期癌症患者沟通的干预措施:严重疾病护理计划的一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):801-809. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0292.
8
Assessment of Natural Language Processing of Electronic Health Records to Measure Goals-of-Care Discussions as a Clinical Trial Outcome.评估电子健康记录中的自然语言处理以衡量作为临床试验结局的照护目标讨论。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231204. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1204.
9
Video Intervention and Goals-of-Care Documentation in Hospitalized Older Adults: The VIDEO-PCE Randomized Clinical Trial.视频干预和住院老年患者的目标治疗记录:VIDEO-PCE 随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2332556. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.32556.
10
Effect of the Serious Illness Care Program in Outpatient Oncology: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.严重疾病照护计划对门诊肿瘤学的影响:一项群组随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jun 1;179(6):751-759. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0077.

引用本文的文献

1
A modular pipeline for natural language processing-screened human abstraction of a pragmatic trial outcome from electronic health records.一种用于自然语言处理的模块化管道——从电子健康记录中筛选出实用试验结果的人工摘要。
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 24:2025.06.23.25330134. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.23.25330134.
2
Using nudges with electronic health records systems to improve advance care planning: a systematic review.利用电子健康记录系统的助推手段改善预立医疗计划:一项系统综述
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01820-4.
3
Assessment of a zero-shot large language model in measuring documented goals-of-care discussions.

本文引用的文献

1
Three Stories About the Value of Advance Care Planning.关于预先护理计划价值的三个故事。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2133-2134. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.21075.
2
What's Wrong With Advance Care Planning?预先护理规划存在什么问题?
JAMA. 2021 Oct 26;326(16):1575-1576. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16430.
3
What Affects Adoption of Specialty Palliative Care in Intensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study.影响重症监护病房采用专科姑息治疗的因素:一项定性研究。
在衡量有记录的照护目标讨论方面对零样本大语言模型的评估
medRxiv. 2025 May 25:2025.05.23.25328115. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.23.25328115.
4
How Do Clinicians Use Quotations in Goals of Care Notes?临床医生如何在照护目标记录中使用引文?
Chest. 2025 Jun;167(6):1737-1745. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2025.01.014. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
5
Mobile App-Facilitated Collaborative Palliative Care Intervention for Critically Ill Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.针对重症老年患者的移动应用程序辅助协作姑息治疗干预:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Feb 1;185(2):173-183. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6838.
6
Communication, Shared Decision-making and Goals of Care in the ICU through Electronic Health Records: A Scoping Review.通过电子健康记录实现重症监护病房中的沟通、共同决策与照护目标:一项范围综述
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Oct;28(10):977-987. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24818. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
7
Attitudes towards advance care planning amongst community-based older people in England.英国社区老年人对预先医疗护理计划的态度。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 21;19(8):e0306810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306810. eCollection 2024.
8
Clinician- and Patient-Directed Communication Strategies for Patients With Cancer at High Mortality Risk: A Cluster Randomized Trial.面向高死亡风险癌症患者的临床医生和患者导向的沟通策略:一项集群随机试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2418639. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18639.
9
Applying human-centered design to adapt the Jumpstart Guide for goals-of-care discussions in persons living with dementia.运用以人为中心的设计方法改编《Jumpstart 指南》,以促进痴呆患者的目标关怀讨论。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul;72(7):2111-2119. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18965. Epub 2024 May 27.
10
Classification of Documented Goals of Care Among Hospitalized Patients with High Mortality Risk: a Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study.高死亡风险住院患者的有记录的照护目标分类:一项混合方法可行性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Aug;39(10):1839-1849. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08773-z. Epub 2024 May 6.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Dec;62(6):1273-1282. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
4
Applying Human-Centered Design to Refinement of the Jumpstart Guide, a Clinician- and Patient-Facing Goals-of-Care Discussion Priming Tool.运用以人为中心的设计完善 Jumpstart 指南,这是一种面向临床医生和患者的目标关怀讨论启动工具。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Dec;62(6):1283-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.06.012. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
5
Recognizing a Patient Is Acutely Dying.识别患者处于濒死状态。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Oct;17(10):1195-1198. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202002-115IP.
6
Assessment of Discordance Between Surrogate Care Goals and Medical Treatment Provided to Older Adults With Serious Illness.评估老年重病患者的替代护理目标与所提供医疗护理之间的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e205179. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5179.
7
Use and Meaning of "Goals of Care" in the Healthcare Literature: a Systematic Review and Qualitative Discourse Analysis.《医疗保健文献中“照护目标”的使用和意义:系统评价和定性话语分析》。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1559-1566. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05446-0. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
8
Kappa Coefficients for Missing Data.缺失数据的卡帕系数。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Jun;79(3):558-576. doi: 10.1177/0013164418823249. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
9
Patient and Family Engagement During Treatment Decisions in an ICU: A Discourse Analysis of the Electronic Health Record.患者和家属在 ICU 治疗决策中的参与:电子健康记录的话语分析。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;47(6):784-791. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003711.
10
Did a Goals-of-Care Discussion Happen? Differences in the Occurrence of Goals-of-Care Discussions as Reported by Patients, Clinicians, and in the Electronic Health Record.是否进行了医疗照护目标讨论?患者、临床医生报告和电子健康记录中医疗照护目标讨论的发生情况存在差异。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Feb;57(2):251-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.10.507. Epub 2018 Nov 1.