Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (KJPP), University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Addiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, Addiction Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, University of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Bristol, UK.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 May 1;234:109410. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109410. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
Previous research has demonstrated a preventive effect of the alcohol policy environment on alcohol consumption. However, little is known about the heterogeneity of this effect. Our aim was to examine the extent of heterogeneity in the relationship between the strictness of alcohol policy environments and heavy drinking and to identify potential moderators of the relationship.
Cross-sectional data from 5986 young Swiss men participating in the cohort study on substance use risk factors (C-SURF) were analysed. The primary outcome was self-reported risky single-occasion drinking in the past 12 months (RSOD, defined as 6 standard drinks or more on a single occasion at least monthly). A previously-used index of alcohol policy environment strictness across Swiss cantons was analysed in conjunction with 21 potential moderator variables. Random forest machine learning captured high-dimensional interaction effects, while individual conditional expectations captured the heterogeneity induced by the interaction effects and identified moderators.
Predicted subject-specific absolute risk reductions in RSOD risk ranged from 16.8% to - 4.2%, indicating considerable heterogeneity. Sensation seeking and antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) were major moderators that reduced the preventive relationship between stricter alcohol policy environments and RSOD risk. They also were associated with the paradoxical observation that some individuals displayed increased RSOD risk in stricter alcohol policy environments.
Whereas stricter alcohol policy environments were associated with reduced average RSOD risk, additionally addressing the risk conveyed by sensation seeking and ASPD would deliver an interlocking prevention mix against young Swiss men's RSOD.
先前的研究表明,酒精政策环境对饮酒量有预防作用。然而,对于这种影响的异质性知之甚少。我们的目的是检验酒精政策环境的严格程度与豪饮之间关系的异质性程度,并确定该关系的潜在调节因素。
对参加物质使用风险因素队列研究(C-SURF)的 5986 名瑞士年轻男性的横断面数据进行了分析。主要结局指标是过去 12 个月内自我报告的风险型单次饮酒(RSOD,定义为每月至少一次单次饮酒 6 标准杯或以上)。分析了瑞士各州的酒精政策环境严格程度的先前使用指数,并结合了 21 个潜在的调节变量。随机森林机器学习捕捉了高维交互效应,而个体条件期望则捕捉了交互效应引起的异质性,并确定了调节因素。
RSOD 风险的预测个体特定绝对风险降低率从 16.8%到-4.2%,表明存在相当大的异质性。感觉寻求和反社会人格障碍(ASPD)是主要的调节因素,它们降低了更严格的酒精政策环境与 RSOD 风险之间的预防关系。它们还与一个矛盾的观察结果有关,即一些人在更严格的酒精政策环境中表现出更高的 RSOD 风险。
虽然更严格的酒精政策环境与降低平均 RSOD 风险有关,但另外解决感觉寻求和 ASPD 带来的风险,将为瑞士年轻男性的 RSOD 提供一个相互关联的预防组合。