• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁共振成像与胎盘植入谱系疾病中的既往剖宫产史:预测模型。

Magnetic resonance imaging and previous cesarean section in placenta accrete spectrum disorder: Predictor model.

机构信息

Departamento de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Departamento de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2022 Mar 29;77:100027. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100027. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100027
PMID:35364517
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8971588/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate objective criteria of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Placenta Accreta Spectrum disorder (PAS) analyzing interobserver agreement and to derive a model including imaging and clinical variables to predict PAS.

METHODS

A retrospective review including patients submitted to MRI with suspicious findings of PAS on ultrasound. Exclusion criteria were lack of pathology or surgical information and missing or poor-quality MRI. Two radiologists analyzed six MRI features, and significant clinical data were also recorded. PAS confirmed on pathology or during intraoperative findings were considered positive for the primary outcome. Variables were tested through logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Final study included 96 patients with a mean age of 33 years and 73.0% of previous C-sections. All MRI features were significantly associated with PAS for both readers. After logistic regression fit, including MRI signs with a moderate or higher interobserver agreement, intraplacental T2 dark band was the most significant radiologic criteria, and ROC analysis resulted in an AUC = 0.782. After including the most relevant clinical data (previous C-section) to the model, the ROC analysis improved to an AUC = 0.893.

CONCLUSION

Simplified objective criteria on MRI, including intraplacental T2 dark band associated with clinical information of previous C-sections, had the highest accuracy and was used for a predictive model of PAS.

摘要

目的

评估磁共振成像(MRI)胎盘植入谱系疾病(PAS)的客观标准,分析观察者间的一致性,并建立一个包括影像学和临床变量的模型来预测 PAS。

方法

回顾性分析包括经超声检查怀疑 PAS 的患者。排除标准为缺乏病理或手术信息,以及 MRI 缺失或质量差。两名放射科医生分析了 6 项 MRI 特征,同时还记录了重要的临床数据。病理或术中发现 PAS 阳性的患者被认为是主要结局阳性。通过逻辑回归模型对变量进行了测试。

结果

最终研究纳入了 96 例患者,平均年龄为 33 岁,73.0%有剖宫产史。两位观察者均发现所有 MRI 特征与 PAS 显著相关。经过逻辑回归拟合后,包括观察者间一致性中等或更高的 MRI 征象,胎盘内 T2 暗带是最显著的影像学标准,ROC 分析得出 AUC=0.782。在将最相关的临床数据(剖宫产史)纳入模型后,ROC 分析提高到 AUC=0.893。

结论

MRI 上简化的客观标准,包括与剖宫产史相关的胎盘内 T2 暗带,具有最高的准确性,并用于 PAS 的预测模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54a/8971588/776734207fcb/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54a/8971588/a8c6e265d211/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54a/8971588/76882e152d74/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54a/8971588/3fd976482d45/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54a/8971588/f72d49545401/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54a/8971588/70afc1d951ed/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54a/8971588/776734207fcb/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54a/8971588/a8c6e265d211/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54a/8971588/76882e152d74/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54a/8971588/3fd976482d45/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54a/8971588/f72d49545401/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54a/8971588/70afc1d951ed/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54a/8971588/776734207fcb/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
Magnetic resonance imaging and previous cesarean section in placenta accrete spectrum disorder: Predictor model.磁共振成像与胎盘植入谱系疾病中的既往剖宫产史:预测模型。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2022 Mar 29;77:100027. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100027. eCollection 2022.
2
Intraplacental T2-hypointense bands may help predict placental invasion depth and postpartum hemorrhage in placenta accrete spectrum disorders in high-risk gravid patients.胎盘内 T2 低信号带有助于预测高危妊娠患者胎盘植入谱系疾病的胎盘侵犯深度和产后出血。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Dec;94:73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2022.09.005. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
3
Prediction of placenta accreta spectrum in patients with placenta previa using a clinical, US and MRI combined model: A retrospective study with external validation.采用临床、超声和 MRI 联合模型预测前置胎盘患者的胎盘植入谱:一项具有外部验证的回顾性研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Nov;168:111116. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111116. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
4
Interobserver agreement in MRI assessment of severity of placenta accreta spectrum disorders.磁共振成像评估胎盘植入谱系疾病严重程度的观察者间一致性
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;55(4):467-473. doi: 10.1002/uog.20381.
5
Role of Ultrasound and MRI in Diagnosis of Severe Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder: An Intraindividual Assessment With Emphasis on Placental Bulge.超声和 MRI 在严重胎盘植入谱系疾病诊断中的作用:强调胎盘膨出的个体内评估。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Dec;217(6):1377-1388. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.25581. Epub 2021 May 26.
6
MRI prognosticators for adverse maternal and neonatal clinical outcome in patients at high risk for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders.MRI 预测指标在胎盘部位滋养细胞疾病谱(PAS)高危患者中对母婴不良临床结局的影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Aug;50(2):602-618. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26592. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
7
Third-trimester ultrasound for antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum in women with placenta previa: results from the ADoPAD study.中孕期超声在前置胎盘孕妇胎盘植入谱系疾病产前诊断中的应用:来自 ADoPAD 研究的结果。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;60(3):381-389. doi: 10.1002/uog.24889.
8
Prediction of placenta accreta spectrum in patients with placenta previa using clinical risk factors, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings.利用临床危险因素、超声和磁共振成像结果预测前置胎盘患者的胎盘植入谱系疾病。
Radiol Med. 2021 Sep;126(9):1216-1225. doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01348-6. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
9
[Risk factor assessment and adverse outcome prediction of placenta accreta in pregnant women after cesarean section complicated with placenta previa: a national multicenter retrospective study].剖宫产术后合并前置胎盘孕妇胎盘植入的危险因素评估及不良结局预测:一项全国多中心回顾性研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jan 25;58(1):26-36. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20221009-00615.
10
The maximum length of T2-dark intraplacental bands may help predict intraoperative haemorrhage in pregnant women with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).T2 暗黑型胎盘内带的最大长度可能有助于预测胎盘植入谱系疾病(PAS)孕妇术中出血。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Oct;47(10):3594-3603. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03619-w. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Additional Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Ultrasound in Assessing Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study from Vietnam.磁共振成像在评估胎盘植入谱系疾病中对超声的辅助作用:一项来自越南的回顾性横断面研究
Oman Med J. 2024 Nov 30;39(6):e697. doi: 10.5001/omj.2024.119. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Comparison of MRI findings for predicting massive hemorrhage during cesarean section in patients with placental malposition: partial placental volume of lower uterine segment is an accurate and objective indicator.胎盘位置异常患者剖宫产术中预测大出血的MRI表现比较:子宫下段部分胎盘体积是准确客观的指标。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 May;311(5):1285-1295. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07909-0. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of radiologists with different levels of experience in the interpretation of MRI of the placenta accreta spectrum disorder.不同经验水平的放射科医生在解读胎盘植入谱系疾病 MRI 中的诊断性能。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Dec;94(1128):20210827. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210827. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
2
Placenta Accreta Spectrum: Correlation of MRI Parameters With Pathologic and Surgical Outcomes of High-Risk Pregnancies.胎盘植入谱系疾病:高危妊娠的 MRI 参数与病理及手术结局的相关性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jun;214(6):1417-1423. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21705. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
3
Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) and European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) joint consensus statement for MR imaging of placenta accreta spectrum disorders.
Comparisons of the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasonic sign-score method and MRI for PA, PI and PP in high-risk gravid women: a retrospective study.超声征象评分法与MRI对高危孕妇前置胎盘、胎盘植入和胎盘早剥诊断准确性的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Jan 31;11(2):81. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-6508.
Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) 和 European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) 联合发布的胎盘植入谱系疾病磁共振成像共识声明。
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2604-2615. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06617-7. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
4
Interobserver agreement in MRI assessment of severity of placenta accreta spectrum disorders.磁共振成像评估胎盘植入谱系疾病严重程度的观察者间一致性
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;55(4):467-473. doi: 10.1002/uog.20381.
5
Systematic review on near miss cases of placenta accreta spectrum disorders: correlation with invasion topography, prenatal imaging, and surgical outcome.胎盘植入谱系疾病的近失案例系统评价:与侵袭性拓扑、产前影像学和手术结果的相关性。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Oct;33(19):3377-3384. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1570494. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
6
MRI Features Predictive of Invasive Placenta With Extrauterine Spread in High-Risk Gravid Patients: Methodologic Issues.预测高危妊娠患者伴有子宫外播散的侵袭性胎盘的MRI特征:方法学问题
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Feb;212(2):W41. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20426.
7
Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management: Green-top Guideline No. 27a.前置胎盘和胎盘植入:诊断与管理:绿帽指南第27a号
BJOG. 2019 Jan;126(1):e1-e48. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15306. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
8
Risk factors for abnormally invasive placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis.异常侵入性胎盘的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Feb;33(3):471-481. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1493453. Epub 2018 Jul 22.
9
Influence of prenatal diagnosis of abnormally invasive placenta on maternal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis.异常侵袭性胎盘产前诊断对母胎结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;52(3):304-309. doi: 10.1002/uog.19070. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
10
FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Prenatal diagnosis and screening.国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)关于胎盘植入谱系疾病的共识指南:产前诊断与筛查
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Mar;140(3):274-280. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12408.