Department of Orthopedics, Wuxi 9th People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Wuxi, China.
Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Mar;11(3):1085-1092. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-208.
Patella fractures treated with traditional open approach and tension band fixation are associated with a significant rate of soft tissues complications, including hardware irritation, postoperative adhesions and non-cosmetic scar. An alternative is to utilize cannulated screws and high-strength sutures by the minimally invasive technique.
This retrospective study comprised 48 patients who had been treated for unilateral closed transverse patellar fracture, type 34C1 according to the AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, between June 2018 to June 2020. All patients were treated either by closed reduction and internal fixation using cannulated screws combined with high-strength sutures and Nice knots (the CRIF-NK group, n=24), or traditional open reduction and internal fixation using cannulated screws and tension band wiring (the ORIF-TBW group, n=24). The operative time and intraoperative blood loss for each patient were recorded. All the patients were underwent a regularly clinical and radiological follow-up. The clinical evaluation was performed using the Böstman scale and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain.
Average follow up was 21.9 months (range, 16-29 months). The mean intraoperative blood loss of the CRIF-NK group (35.21±6.16 mL) was significantly less than that of the ORIF-TBW group (75.42±7.92 mL; P<0.001). The mean VAS scores at 4 and 8 weeks and the mean Böstman scale score at 8 weeks after surgery were significantly better in the CRIF-NK group (3.52±0.42, 1.47±0.40 and 28.13±0.94, respectively) than the ORIF-TBW group (5.16±0.68, 3.14±0.72 and 26.33±1.00, respectively; all P<0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operative time, Böstman scale score at 1-year follow-up, or fracture healing time. The union rate was 100% (24/24) in both groups. One patient (1/24) in the CRIF-NK group, and all patients (24/24) in the ORIF-TBW group required internal fixation removal.
The percutaneous minimally invasive technique using cannulated screws combined with high-strength sutures and Nice knots exhibited some superiority to traditional open reduction with cannulated screws and tension band wiring for treatment of transverse patellar fractures in terms of efficacy and safety by reducing soft-tissue stimulating complications and promoting functional recovery.
采用传统切开复位张力带固定治疗髌骨骨折会导致较高的软组织并发症发生率,包括内固定物激惹、术后粘连和非美观性瘢痕。一种替代方法是采用微创技术,使用空心螺钉和高强缝线。
本回顾性研究纳入了 2018 年 6 月至 2020 年 6 月期间,根据 AO 基金会和骨科创伤协会(AO/OTA)分类,接受单侧闭合性横断髌骨骨折(34C1 型)治疗的 48 例患者。所有患者均接受闭合复位空心螺钉内固定(CRIF-NK 组,n=24)或传统切开复位空心螺钉和张力带钢丝固定(ORIF-TBW 组,n=24)。记录每位患者的手术时间和术中失血量。所有患者均进行定期临床和影像学随访。采用 Böstman 评分和视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛,对临床疗效进行评估。
平均随访时间为 21.9 个月(16-29 个月)。CRIF-NK 组(35.21±6.16ml)的术中出血量明显少于 ORIF-TBW 组(75.42±7.92ml;P<0.001)。术后 4 周和 8 周时的 VAS 评分和术后 8 周时的 Böstman 评分,CRIF-NK 组(3.52±0.42、1.47±0.40 和 28.13±0.94)明显优于 ORIF-TBW 组(5.16±0.68、3.14±0.72 和 26.33±1.00;均 P<0.001)。两组患者的手术时间、1 年随访时的 Böstman 评分和骨折愈合时间差异均无统计学意义。两组的愈合率均为 100%(24/24)。CRIF-NK 组中有 1 例(1/24)患者和 ORIF-TBW 组所有患者(24/24)均需行内固定物取出。
与传统切开复位空心螺钉和张力带钢丝固定相比,经皮微创技术使用空心螺钉结合高强缝线和 Nice 结治疗横断髌骨骨折在减少软组织刺激并发症和促进功能恢复方面具有一定优势,可提高疗效和安全性。