Suppr超能文献

双股编织聚酯缝线张力带(Nice 结)与缆绳张力带治疗横断髌骨骨折的比较。

Comparison of double-strand braided polyester sutures tension band (Nice knot) with cable tension band in transverse patellar fractures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68 Changle Road, Nanjing 210006, China.

出版信息

Injury. 2021 Oct;52(10):3085-3090. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jul 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The tension band technique is the most common method for internal fixation of transverse patellar fractures. Titanium cable and high-strength sutures have been successfully applied in this treatment; however, few studies have compared the Nice knot technique using sutures with the standard cable technique. Whether the suture technique (Nice knot) provides preferable results compared with those of the cable technique is unclear.

METHODS

Forty patients with transverse patellar fractures participated in this study. Twenty patients underwent sutures tension band fixation (Nice knot), and the others were managed with cable tension bands. All patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Pain was measured by VAS scores, flexion and extension of the knee were measured in degrees by goniometry, and knee function was evaluated using the Böstman clinical grading scale.

RESULTS

The two groups had equal distributions in age, gender, injured side, and fracture classification. The mean operation time in the suture group was shorter (55.75±9.77 minutes versus 64.25±9.63 minutes). The VAS score was comparable in the two groups at the 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups; however, the score was lower at 12 months postoperatively in the suture group (P=0.037). No significant difference was found in flexion, extension, Böstman score, or fracture healing time in either group (P>0.05). Postoperative complications were higher in the cable group (9 versus 2) (P = 0.031) but were mostly related to symptomatic soft tissue irritation.

CONCLUSION

The suture tension band technique using braided polyester nonabsorbable sutures tied with Nice knot was as effective as the cable tension band technique for transverse patellar fracture management. However, more convenient operations, less cost and fewer complications were found in suture fixation (Nice knot).

摘要

背景

张力带技术是治疗横断髌骨骨折最常用的内固定方法。钛缆和高强缝线已成功应用于该治疗方法中;然而,很少有研究比较过使用缝线的 Nice 结技术与标准缆线技术。缝线技术(Nice 结)是否比缆线技术提供更好的结果尚不清楚。

方法

本研究纳入了 40 例横断髌骨骨折患者。20 例患者接受了缝线张力带固定(Nice 结),其余患者采用缆线张力带固定。所有患者均在 1、3、6 和 12 个月进行随访。疼痛通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)进行评估,膝关节屈伸通过量角器进行测量,膝关节功能采用 Böstman 临床分级量表进行评估。

结果

两组在年龄、性别、受伤侧和骨折分型方面分布均衡。缝线组的平均手术时间更短(55.75±9.77 分钟比 64.25±9.63 分钟)。两组在 1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月的随访时 VAS 评分相当,但缝线组在 12 个月时的评分较低(P=0.037)。两组在膝关节屈伸度、Böstman 评分或骨折愈合时间方面均无显著差异(P>0.05)。缆线组的术后并发症发生率更高(9 例比 2 例)(P=0.031),但大多与症状性软组织刺激有关。

结论

使用编织聚酯不可吸收缝线并采用 Nice 结的缝线张力带技术与缆线张力带技术治疗横断髌骨骨折同样有效。然而,缝线固定(Nice 结)具有更便捷的操作、更低的成本和更少的并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验