• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮内镜下胃造口管置管时间在头颈部癌症手术中的应用。

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Timing in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2023 Jan;133(1):109-115. doi: 10.1002/lary.30127. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1002/lary.30127
PMID:35366010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10084390/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine outcomes and complications in patients receiving a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube on the same day of head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery versus later in hospitalization.

METHODS

The 2003-2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for patients undergoing ablative HNC procedures who had a PEG tube placed. Cases were stratified by PEG tube timing into an early (on the same day as ablative procedure) and late (later in hospitalization) group. Demographics and outcomes were compared using univariate analysis and multivariate regression modeling.

RESULTS

A total of 4,068 cases were included, of which 2,206 (54.23%) underwent early PEG and 1,862 (45.77%) received a late PEG tube. Late PEG tube patients were more likely to have a diagnosis of malnutrition (18.0% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.018) or renal failure (4.7% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.006). On multivariate regression analysis, patients receiving late PEG tubes were more likely to experience aspiration pneumonia, acute pulmonary disease, infectious pneumonia, sepsis, hematoma, wound disruption, surgical site infection, and fistula formation (all p < 0.05). The mean length of stay and hospital charges in the late PEG group were significantly greater (17.1 vs. 12.6 days, p < 0.001) and ($159,993 vs. $125,705, p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing HNC surgery who received a PEG tube on the day of ablative surgery had lower complication rates, shorter length of stay, and decreased hospital costs compared to those who had a PEG tube placed later during hospitalization. Further research is needed to determine the causal relationships behind these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 133:109-115, 2023.

摘要

目的

研究头颈部癌症(HNC)手术当天和住院后期接受经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)的患者的结局和并发症。

方法

通过 2003 年至 2014 年全国住院患者样本,对接受消融性 HNC 手术并放置 PEG 管的患者进行了查询。根据 PEG 管放置时间,将病例分为早期(与消融性手术同日)和晚期(住院后期)两组。使用单变量分析和多变量回归模型比较人口统计学和结局。

结果

共纳入 4068 例患者,其中 2206 例(54.23%)接受早期 PEG,1862 例(45.77%)接受晚期 PEG 管。晚期 PEG 管患者更有可能被诊断为营养不良(18.0% vs. 15.3%,p=0.018)或肾衰竭(4.7% vs. 3.0%,p=0.006)。多变量回归分析显示,接受晚期 PEG 管的患者更有可能出现吸入性肺炎、急性肺部疾病、感染性肺炎、败血症、血肿、伤口破裂、手术部位感染和瘘管形成(均 p<0.05)。晚期 PEG 组的平均住院时间和住院费用明显更长(17.1 天 vs. 12.6 天,p<0.001)和更高(159993 美元 vs. 125705 美元,p<0.001)。

结论

与住院期间放置 PEG 管的患者相比,接受消融性手术当天放置 PEG 管的 HNC 手术患者的并发症发生率更低,住院时间更短,住院费用更低。需要进一步研究以确定这些发现背后的因果关系。

证据水平

3 级。喉镜,133:109-115,2023。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Timing in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery.经皮内镜下胃造口管置管时间在头颈部癌症手术中的应用。
Laryngoscope. 2023 Jan;133(1):109-115. doi: 10.1002/lary.30127. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
2
Complications of Gastrostomy Tubes in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.头颈部癌症患者胃管相关并发症。
Laryngoscope. 2022 Sep;132(9):1778-1784. doi: 10.1002/lary.30017. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
3
Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in treatment of head and neck cancer: a comprehensive review and call for evidence-based medicine.预防性经皮内镜胃造口术在头颈部癌症治疗中的应用:系统评价和循证医学呼吁。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011 May;35(3):365-74. doi: 10.1177/0148607110377097.
4
Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with head and neck cancer: Influence on nutritional status, utilisation rate and complications.预防性经皮内镜胃造口术在头颈部癌症患者中的应用:对营养状况、使用率和并发症的影响。
Int J Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;73(11):e13405. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13405. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
5
The introducer technique is the optimal method for placing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in head and neck cancer patients.导入器技术是为头颈癌患者放置经皮内镜下胃造口管的最佳方法。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jun;21(6):897-901. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9068-9. Epub 2006 Dec 16.
6
Prospective experience of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes placed by otorhinolaryngologist-head and neck surgeons: safe and efficacious.耳鼻咽喉头颈外科医生放置经皮内镜下胃造瘘管的前瞻性经验:安全且有效。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Nov;274(11):3971-3976. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4732-3. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
7
Prophylactic Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) - The Importance of Nutritonal Support in Patients with Head and Neck Cancers (HNCs) or Neurogenic Dysphagia (ND).预防性经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)——营养支持在头颈部癌症(HNCs)或神经源性吞咽困难(ND)患者中的重要性
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2015 Mar-Apr;110(2):129-36.
8
Tube feeding in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy: A systematic review.头颈部癌症放化疗患者的管饲:系统评价。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022 Aug;46(6):1258-1269. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2360. Epub 2022 May 22.
9
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement by otorhinolaryngologist-head and neck surgeons.耳鼻喉头颈外科医生进行经皮内镜下胃造口管置入术。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2014 Jul;134(7):760-7. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2014.895040. Epub 2014 May 5.
10
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances.经皮内镜下胃造口术与鼻胃管喂养用于吞咽障碍成人患者的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 22;2015(5):CD008096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008096.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy for the Nutrition of Head and Neck Cancer Patients before and up to 6 Months after Cancer Treatment.经皮内镜下胃造口术在头颈癌患者癌症治疗前及治疗后长达6个月的营养支持中的作用
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 12;16(18):3138. doi: 10.3390/cancers16183138.
2
"Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality, complications, or outcomes": Commentary.“中风后患者经皮内镜下胃造口管置入的时机不影响死亡率、并发症或预后”:评论
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jan 20;14(1):1-3. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v14.i1.1.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of oropharyngeal dysphagia on healthcare cost and length of stay in hospital: a systematic review.口咽吞咽困难对医疗费用和住院时间的影响:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 2;18(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3376-3.
2
Malnutrition in Chronic Kidney Disease.慢性肾脏病中的营养不良
Front Pediatr. 2018 Jun 20;6:161. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00161. eCollection 2018.
3
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Outcomes and Complications of Percutaneous Endoscopic Versus Radiologic Gastrostomy for Enteral Feeding.经皮内镜与放射胃造口术用于肠内喂养的结局和并发症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct;52(9):753-764. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001082.
4
Association of Anesthesia Duration With Complications After Microvascular Reconstruction of the Head and Neck.麻醉持续时间与头颈部微血管重建术后并发症的关联。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018 May 1;20(3):188-195. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2017.1607.
5
Gastrostomy in head and neck cancer: current literature, controversies and research.头颈部癌中的胃造口术:当前文献、争议与研究
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Apr;23(2):162-70. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000135.
6
Effect of weight loss on short-term outcomes and costs of care after head and neck cancer surgery.体重减轻对头颈癌手术后短期结局及护理费用的影响。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014 Feb;123(2):101-10. doi: 10.1177/0003489414523564.
7
Feeding tube use in patients with head and neck cancer.头颈部癌症患者使用饲管的情况。
Head Neck. 2014 Dec;36(12):1789-95. doi: 10.1002/hed.23538. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
8
Prophylactic versus reactive PEG tube placement in head and neck cancer.预防性与反应性 PEG 管放置在头颈部癌症中的比较。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Mar;150(3):407-12. doi: 10.1177/0194599813517081. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
9
Comparable operative times with and without surgery resident participation.手术中是否有住院医师参与的手术时间相当。
J Surg Educ. 2013 Nov-Dec;70(6):696-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
10
Gastrostomy insertion in head and neck cancer patients: a 3 year review of insertion method and complication rates.头颈部癌症患者的胃造口术置入:置入方法及并发症发生率的3年回顾
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;51(8):714-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Aug 13.