• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任务条件的变化会导致中枢神经系统在控制人体站立时采用的间歇性反馈控制中的间歇性变化。

Change in task conditions leads to changes in intermittency in intermittent feedback control employed by CNS in control of human stance.

机构信息

SysIDEA Robotics Lab, Mechanical Engineering, IIT Gandhinagar, Palaj, 382355, GJ, India.

出版信息

Biol Cybern. 2022 Aug;116(4):447-459. doi: 10.1007/s00422-022-00927-8. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00422-022-00927-8
PMID:35366107
Abstract

Event-driven intermittent feedback control is a form of feedback control in which the corrective control action is only initiated intermittently when the variables of interest exceed certain threshold criteria. It has been reported in the literature that the CNS uses an event-driven intermittent control strategy to stabilize the human upright posture. However, whether the threshold criteria may change under different postural task conditions is not yet well understood. We employ a numerical study with inverted pendulum models and an experimental study with 51 young healthy individuals (13 females and 38 males; age: 27.8 ± 6.5 years) with stabilogram-diffusion, temporal and spectral analysis applied to COP (Center of Pressure) trajectories measured from these experiments to examine this aspect. The present study provides compelling evidence that inducing a natural arm swing during quiet stance appears to lead to higher sensory dead zone in neuronal control reflecting higher intermittency thresholds in active feedback control and a corresponding lower sensory dependence. Beyond the obvious scientific interest in understanding this aspect of how CNS controls the standing posture, an investigation of the said control strategy may subsequently help uncover insights about how control of quiet stance degrades with age and in diseased conditions. Additionally, such an understanding will also be of interest to the humanoid robotics community as it may lead to insights leading to improving control strategies for posture control in robots.

摘要

事件驱动的间歇反馈控制是一种反馈控制形式,其中只有在感兴趣的变量超过某些阈值标准时,才会间歇性地启动纠正控制动作。文献报道称,中枢神经系统(CNS)使用事件驱动的间歇控制策略来稳定人体的直立姿势。然而,在不同的姿势任务条件下,阈值标准是否会发生变化尚不清楚。我们采用数值研究(使用倒立摆模型)和实验研究(涉及 51 名年轻健康个体(女性 13 名,男性 38 名;年龄:27.8 ± 6.5 岁),并应用稳定图扩散、时间和频谱分析对这些实验中测量的 COP(重心)轨迹进行分析)来研究这一方面。本研究提供了令人信服的证据,表明在安静站立时引入自然的手臂摆动似乎会导致神经元控制中的感觉死区更高,反映出主动反馈控制中的间歇性阈值更高,相应的感觉依赖性更低。除了在理解中枢神经系统如何控制站立姿势方面具有明显的科学兴趣外,对这种控制策略的研究也可能有助于揭示随着年龄的增长和疾病状态下,安静站立控制如何恶化的机制。此外,这种理解也将引起仿人机器人社区的关注,因为它可能为提高机器人的姿势控制策略提供一些思路。

相似文献

1
Change in task conditions leads to changes in intermittency in intermittent feedback control employed by CNS in control of human stance.任务条件的变化会导致中枢神经系统在控制人体站立时采用的间歇性反馈控制中的间歇性变化。
Biol Cybern. 2022 Aug;116(4):447-459. doi: 10.1007/s00422-022-00927-8. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
2
A Correlation-Based Framework for Evaluating Postural Control Stochastic Dynamics.基于相关性的姿势控制随机动力学评估框架。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2016 May;24(5):551-561. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2436344. Epub 2015 May 22.
3
Reinforcement learning for stabilizing an inverted pendulum naturally leads to intermittent feedback control as in human quiet standing.用于稳定倒立摆的强化学习自然会导致如人类安静站立时的间歇性反馈控制。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:37-40. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7590634.
4
Age-related changes in open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms.开环和闭环姿势控制机制的年龄相关变化。
Exp Brain Res. 1995;104(3):480-92. doi: 10.1007/BF00231982.
5
The effects of visual input on open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms.视觉输入对开环和闭环姿势控制机制的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 1995;103(1):151-63. doi: 10.1007/BF00241972.
6
Comparison of human and humanoid robot control of upright stance.人类与类人机器人直立姿势控制的比较。
J Physiol Paris. 2009 Sep-Dec;103(3-5):149-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
7
Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing.安静站立时平衡的刚度控制
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Sep;80(3):1211-21. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1211.
8
Intermittent Feedback-Control Strategy for Stabilizing Inverted Pendulum on Manually Controlled Cart as Analogy to Human Stick Balancing.用于稳定手动控制小车上倒立摆的间歇反馈控制策略——类比人类杆平衡
Front Comput Neurosci. 2016 Apr 19;10:34. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2016.00034. eCollection 2016.
9
Vestibular humanoid postural control.前庭类人姿势控制
J Physiol Paris. 2009 Sep-Dec;103(3-5):178-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
10
Human stance control beyond steady state response and inverted pendulum simplification.超越稳态响应和倒立摆简化的人体姿态控制。
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;185(4):635-53. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1189-4. Epub 2007 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating continuous and intermittent feedback models of postural control using the least squares method.使用最小二乘法估计姿势控制的连续和间歇性反馈模型。
Biol Cybern. 2025 May 17;119(2-3):11. doi: 10.1007/s00422-025-01009-1.
2
The body postures of individuals of both sexes ranging in height from 180 to 195 cm, in the light of the mora phenomenon.根据莫拉现象,身高在180至195厘米之间的男女个体的身体姿势。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Mar 25;26(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08362-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Microchaos in human postural balance: Sensory dead zones and sampled time-delayed feedback.人体姿势平衡中的微混沌:感觉死区和采样时滞反馈。
Phys Rev E. 2018 Aug;98(2-1):022223. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.98.022223.
2
A Sensitivity Analysis of an Inverted Pendulum Balance Control Model.倒立摆平衡控制模型的灵敏度分析
Front Comput Neurosci. 2017 Oct 27;11:99. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2017.00099. eCollection 2017.
3
Limit cycle oscillations in standing human posture.人体站立姿势中的极限环振荡。
J Biomech. 2016 May 3;49(7):1170-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
4
Smooth enlargement of human standing sway by instability due to weak reaction floor and noise.由于反应底板薄弱和噪声导致的不稳定,使人站立时摇摆平稳增大。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Jan 6;3(1):150570. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150570. eCollection 2016 Jan.
5
Center of pressure velocity reflects body acceleration rather than body velocity during quiet standing.在安静站立期间,压力中心速度反映的是身体加速度而非身体速度。
Gait Posture. 2014 Mar;39(3):946-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.12.008. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
6
Identification of intermittent control in man and machine.人体和机器中的间歇控制的识别。
J R Soc Interface. 2012 Sep 7;9(74):2070-84. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0142. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
7
Sway regularity reflects attentional involvement in postural control: effects of expertise, vision and cognition.摇摆规律反映了注意力在姿势控制中的参与:专业技能、视觉和认知的影响。
Gait Posture. 2009 Jul;30(1):106-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 May 2.
8
Synthesis of natural arm swing motion in human bipedal walking.人类双足行走中自然摆臂运动的合成
J Biomech. 2008;41(7):1417-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.02.031. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
9
Assessment of postural instability in patients with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病患者姿势不稳的评估。
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Oct;183(1):107-14. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1024-y. Epub 2007 Jul 4.
10
Regularity of center-of-pressure trajectories depends on the amount of attention invested in postural control.压力中心轨迹的规律性取决于在姿势控制上投入的注意力程度。
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jul;181(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0905-4. Epub 2007 Mar 31.