Closing the global pain divide: balancing access and excess.
作者信息
Knaul Felicia Marie, Rosa William E, Arreola-Ornelas Héctor, Nargund Renu Sara
机构信息
Institute for Advanced Study of the Americas, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA; Tómatelo a Pecho, Mexico City, Mexico; Fundación Mexicana Para la Salud, Mexico City, Mexico.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
出版信息
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Apr;7(4):e295-e296. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00063-9.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Closing the global pain divide: balancing access and excess.消除全球疼痛差距：平衡可及性与过度治疗。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Apr;7(4):e295-e296. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00063-9.
2
Closing the divide: the Harvard Global Equity Initiative-Lancet Commission on global access to pain control and palliative care.弥合差距：哈佛全球公平倡议-《柳叶刀》全球疼痛控制与姑息治疗可及性委员会
Lancet. 2015 Aug 22;386(9995):722-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60289-6. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
3
Closing the Cancer Divide Through Ubuntu: Information and Communication Technology-Powered Models for Global Radiation Oncology.通过“乌班图”理念缩小癌症治疗差距：信息通信技术驱动的全球放射肿瘤学模式
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Mar 1;94(3):440-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.10.063. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
4
The Grand Convergence: Closing the Divide between Public Health Funding and Global Health Needs.《大融合：弥合公共卫生资金与全球卫生需求之间的差距》
PLoS Biol. 2016 Mar 2;14(3):e1002363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002363. eCollection 2016 Mar.
5
Closing the global cancer divide--performance of breast cancer care services in a middle income developing country.缩小全球癌症差距——中等收入发展中国家乳腺癌护理服务的表现。
BMC Cancer. 2014 Mar 20;14:212. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-212.
6
Solving the Global Crisis in Access to Pain Relief: Lessons From Country Actions.解决全球缓解疼痛困境：来自国家行动的经验教训。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(1):58-60. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304769. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
7
Bridging the divide: global inequities in access to HIV/AIDS therapy.
Med J Aust. 2001;175(11-12):570-2. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143729.x.
8
Essential medicines twenty-five years on: closing the access gap.25年来的基本药物：缩小可及差距
Health Policy Plan. 2003 Mar;18(1):1-3. doi: 10.1093/heapol/18.1.1.
9
Palliative care and pain treatment in the global health agenda.全球卫生议程中的姑息治疗与疼痛治疗
Pain. 2015 Apr;156 Suppl 1:S115-S118. doi: 10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460349.23083.0b.
10
Erasing the global divide in health research.消除全球卫生研究领域的差距。
BMJ. 1997 Feb 8;314(7078):390. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7078.390.
引用本文的文献
1
Towards opioid access without excess.实现阿片类药物的合理可及性。
Lancet Public Health. 2025 May;10(5):e422-e427. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00035-0. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
2
Development of prescribing indicators related to opioid-related harm in patients with chronic pain in primary care-a modified e-Delphi study.制定与初级保健中慢性疼痛患者阿片类药物相关伤害相关的处方指标-一项改良版电子德尔菲研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Jan 2;22(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03213-x.
3
Parallel opioid crises: brakes on sustainable development?并行的阿片类药物危机：可持续发展的阻碍？
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2023 May 26;17:26323524231176574. doi: 10.1177/26323524231176574. eCollection 2023.
4
Can You Hear Us Now? Equity in Global Advocacy for Palliative Care.大家现在能听到我们的声音了吗？全球倡导姑息治疗中的公平问题。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Oct;64(4):e217-e226. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
5
Social justice now for an equitable tomorrow: Reflections from the Consortium of Universities for Global Health Conference 2022.社会公正，共创美好明天：2022 年全球健康大学联盟会议有感。
PLoS Med. 2022 Apr 22;19(4):e1003995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003995. eCollection 2022 Apr.
本文引用的文献
1
Global, regional, and national trends in opioid analgesic consumption from 2015 to 2019: a longitudinal study.2015 年至 2019 年全球、区域和国家阿片类镇痛药消耗趋势：一项纵向研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Apr;7(4):e335-e346. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00013-5.
2
Responding to the opioid crisis in North America and beyond: recommendations of the Stanford-Lancet Commission.应对北美及其他地区的阿片类药物危机：斯坦福-柳叶刀委员会的建议
Lancet. 2022 Feb 5;399(10324):555-604. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02252-2. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
3
The US Cancer Pain Crisis and the Global Pain Divide: Can Two Wrongs Make It Right?美国癌症疼痛危机与全球疼痛差距：两个错误能变成正确吗？
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 20;40(3):310-311. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02049. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
4
US Trends in Opioid Access Among Patients With Poor Prognosis Cancer Near the End-of-Life.美国终末期癌症预后不良患者阿片类药物获取情况的趋势。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 10;39(26):2948-2958. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00476. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
5
Ensuring and Restoring Balance on Access to Controlled Substances for Medical and Scientific Purposes: Joint Statement from Palliative Care Organizations.确保和恢复医疗及科研目的管制药品获取的平衡：姑息治疗组织联合声明
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2018 Jun-Sep;32(2-3):124-128. doi: 10.1080/15360288.2018.1488792. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
6
Alleviating the access abyss in palliative care and pain relief-an imperative of universal health coverage: the Lancet Commission report.缓解姑息治疗和疼痛缓解方面的获取差距——全民健康覆盖的当务之急：《柳叶刀》委员会报告
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1391-1454. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32513-8. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
7
Disparities in the contribution of low- and middle-income countries to palliative care research.中低收入国家在缓和医疗研究中的贡献存在差异。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Jan;39(1):54-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.05.023. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
8
Global notes: the 10/90 gap disparities in global health research.全球概况：全球卫生研究中的10/90差距差异
J Perinatol. 2006 Jan 1;26(1):55-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211402.
Zotero 插件