Research Development Unit, Caboolture Hospital, Queensland Health, McKean St, Caboolture, QLD, 4510, Australia.
Centre for Clinical Research, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, 4029, Australia.
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Apr 2;22(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03244-y.
There is significant variability in clinical pathways available in the diagnostic assessment of ASD, including the order and timing of allied health assessments in relation to paediatrician consultations. Allied health professionals in first-contact models are increasingly used to improve the timeliness of healthcare access, whilst complementing medical specialty workforce shortages. Anecdotally, the implementation of allied health first-contact models in paediatrics has improved waitlists and timely access to healthcare. However, no rigorous studies have been conducted to evaluate the outcomes of these models. This study aims to determine the impacts of an allied health first-contact model on health service use and costs and patient quality of life and satisfaction.
An open, semi-blinded, multi-centre randomised controlled trial in paediatric outpatient clinics at two Australian metropolitan public hospitals. 56 children (0-16 years) fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be randomised to one of two clinical pathways for assessment of ASD: (1) allied health first-contact or (2) medical first-contact model. Cost outcomes will be collected from both health service and family perspectives. Caregiver-reported outcome measures include: Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), the EuroQOL Five Dimension Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y), the Autism Family Experience Questionnaire (AFEQ) and Measure of Processes of Care.
Evidence of improvements in service and consumer centric outcomes will help inform the development and implementation of high-value, evidenced based models of care for the assessment of ASD in children. The findings from this study are expected to contribute to the evidence base around the costs and consequences of allied health first contact models for the assessment of children with ASD in the Australian setting. Findings of this study may help to inform the allocation of health care resources while maintaining, or potentially improving, patient and family quality of life and experience of care. These findings may be useful in informing the wider adoption of these models in Australia and internationally, particularly in healthcare settings where medical specialist shortages exist.
Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR) ACTRN12621001433897 . Registered: 25 October, 2021.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的诊断评估中存在着显著的临床路径差异,包括儿科医生会诊时辅助健康评估的顺序和时间。在初级保健模式中,辅助医疗专业人员的使用越来越多,以提高医疗保健的及时性,同时弥补医学专业人员短缺的问题。据传闻,儿科辅助医疗初级保健模式的实施改善了候补名单和及时获得医疗保健的机会。然而,目前还没有严格的研究来评估这些模式的结果。本研究旨在确定辅助医疗初级保健模式对医疗服务的使用和成本、患者的生活质量和满意度的影响。
这是一项在澳大利亚两家大都市公立医院的儿科门诊进行的开放性、半盲、多中心随机对照试验。将 56 名符合纳入标准的儿童(0-16 岁)随机分配到 ASD 评估的两种临床路径之一:(1)辅助医疗初级保健模式或(2)医学初级保健模式。将从医疗服务和家庭两个角度收集成本结果。护理人员报告的结果测量包括:儿科生活质量量表(PedsQL)、欧洲五维健康量表青年版(EQ-5D-Y)、自闭症家庭体验问卷(AFEQ)和护理过程测量。
服务和以消费者为中心的结果改进的证据将有助于为澳大利亚儿童 ASD 评估的高价值、基于证据的护理模式的制定和实施提供信息。本研究的结果预计将为澳大利亚辅助医疗初级保健模式评估 ASD 儿童的成本和后果的证据基础做出贡献。本研究的结果可能有助于在维持或可能改善患者和家庭的生活质量和护理体验的同时,为医疗保健资源的分配提供信息。这些发现可能有助于在澳大利亚和国际上更广泛地采用这些模式,特别是在存在医学专家短缺的医疗保健环境中。
澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册(ANZCTR)ACTRN12621001433897。注册日期:2021 年 10 月 25 日。