Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), 1432 Ås, Norway.
Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), 1432 Ås, Norway; Presently Norwegian Centre for Organic Agriculture, 6630 Tingvoll, Norway..
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 20;831:154582. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154582. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
Revised IPCC guidelines assume that a constant share of N in decomposing crop residues is directly emitted as NO (emission factor: EF), and calculate the amount of nitrogen (N) in non-removable residues of temporary grasslands proportionally to the average annual herbage yield. However, EF depends on the intrinsic quality of the residues and their interactions with environmental conditions. Only a few field studies on NO emissions from grassland renewal are available, and none have simultaneously quantified the N amount and quality of non-removable residues (roots and stubble). To gain insight into the effect of non-removable residue quality on EF, we studied the amount and quality of roots and stubble and their effect on EF following the ploughing of three-year-old swards. The measured amount of N in non-removable residues was approximately 20, 25, and 31 kg N per 1 Mg average annual dry matter yield in grass, red clover-grass, and red clover, and 70-83% of it was below ground. However, the EF of non-removable residues measured over 252 days was lower (0.24%, SE = 14% for grass and red clover-grass) than the IPCC default value (0.6%, CV: 50%) for wet regions, although within the uncertainty margin, and was significantly lower than the EF of incorporated herbage, which was related to differences in EF. We advocate for more specific studies that separate the effects of belowground and aboveground residues (AGR), considering the possibility of simplifying the accounting of NO emissions from belowground residues while improving that of non-removable AGR from temporary grasslands and other green crops. We observed the accumulation of NO in the frozen soil under snow, which was released during diurnal percolation of meltwater. NO emissions from frozen soil accounted for 30% or more of the total emissions.
《政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)指南》修订版假设,在分解作物残体的过程中,N 的固定比例会直接以 NO 的形式排放(排放系数:EF),并根据临时草地的平均年草产量按比例计算不可移动残体中的氮(N)量。然而,EF 取决于残体的内在质量及其与环境条件的相互作用。仅有少数关于草地更新过程中 NO 排放的田间研究,并且没有一项研究同时量化了不可移动残体(根系和茬)的 N 量和质量。为了深入了解不可移动残体质量对 EF 的影响,我们研究了三年生草地翻耕后根系和茬的数量和质量及其对 EF 的影响。在草、红三叶草-草和红三叶草中,不可移动残体中 N 的测量量分别约为每 1 Mg 平均年干物质产量 20、25 和 31 kg N,其中 70-83%在地下。然而,在 252 天内测量的不可移动残体的 EF(草和红三叶草-草为 0.24%,SE=14%)低于《政府间气候变化专门委员会》(IPCC)默认值(湿地区域 0.6%,CV:50%),尽管在不确定性范围内,但明显低于已纳入的草料 EF,这与 EF 的差异有关。我们提倡进行更具体的研究,将地下和地上残体(AGR)的影响分开考虑,考虑到在简化地下残体 NO 排放核算的同时,提高临时草地和其他绿色作物中不可移动 AGR 的核算的可能性。我们观察到,在融雪的白天渗滤过程中,积雪下的土壤中积累的 NO 会释放出来。冻结土壤的 NO 排放占总排放量的 30%或更多。