Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Complement Ther Med. 2022 Aug;67:102827. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2022.102827. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
With the expansion of the internet, social media platforms have become a major source of medical information. However, medical information on online multimedia platforms is often inaccurate. In the current study, we evaluated the reliability, quality, and accuracy of the most viewed YouTube videos featuring the effects of vitamin C on COVID-19.
A search was conducted on YouTube on January 13, 2022, using the keywords ("ascorbic acid" OR "vitamin C" OR "sodium ascorbate" OR "L-ascorbic") AND ("coronavirus" OR "COVID 19" OR "COVID-19" OR "Corona" OR "COVID" OR "SARSCoV2"). We assessed the 50 most-viewed videos using a modified DISCERN scale (mDISCERN) and Global Quality Scale (GQS). Additionally, the accuracy of the information in each video was evaluated.
Out of the 50 most-viewed videos featuring the effect of vitamin C on COVID-19, 54% were not reliable. Furthermore, 62% presented poor quality, and 74% were misleading or neither accurate nor misleading. The average mDISCERN and GQS scores of the 50 included videos were 2.2 ± 1.4 (≥ 3: highly reliable) and 2.2 ± 1.1 (2: generally poor), respectively. Although the videos were made by medical doctors, their reliability, quality, and accuracy were not significantly different from those displayed in other sources, including fitness channels, television or internet-based news or programs, consumers, company channels, product advertisements, or prepared by nurses.
The reliability, quality, and accuracy of the 50 most-viewed videos on the effect of vitamin C on COVID-19 were not high. Video creators, especially medical doctors, should make an effort so that the videos present reliable content with high-quality and correct information is disseminated to people.
随着互联网的发展,社交媒体平台已成为获取医学信息的主要来源。然而,在线多媒体平台上的医学信息往往不够准确。在本研究中,我们评估了在 YouTube 上观看次数最多的介绍维生素 C 对 COVID-19 影响的视频的可靠性、质量和准确性。
我们于 2022 年 1 月 13 日在 YouTube 上使用关键词(“抗坏血酸”或“维生素 C”或“抗坏血酸钠”或“L-抗坏血酸”)AND(“冠状病毒”或“COVID-19”或“COVID-19”或“Corona”或“COVID”或“SARS-CoV2”)进行搜索。我们使用改良的 DISCERN 量表(mDISCERN)和全球质量量表(GQS)对前 50 个最受欢迎的视频进行评估。此外,还评估了每个视频中信息的准确性。
在介绍维生素 C 对 COVID-19 影响的 50 个最受欢迎的视频中,有 54%的视频不可靠。此外,有 62%的视频质量较差,74%的视频存在误导或不准确。50 个视频的平均 mDISCERN 和 GQS 评分为 2.2±1.4(≥3:高度可靠)和 2.2±1.1(2:一般较差)。尽管这些视频是由医生制作的,但它们的可靠性、质量和准确性与其他来源(包括健身频道、电视或互联网新闻或节目、消费者、公司频道、产品广告或由护士制作的视频)相比并没有显著差异。
维生素 C 对 COVID-19 影响的 50 个最受欢迎的视频的可靠性、质量和准确性均不高。视频制作者,特别是医生,应努力确保视频内容可靠,信息质量高,正确传播给大众。