Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, Ontario L5L 1C6, Canada; Graduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada.
Graduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada.
Neuroimage Clin. 2022;34:102969. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102969. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
Neural reactivity to dysphoric mood induction indexes the tendency for distress to promote cognitive reactivity and sensory avoidance. Linking these responses to illness prognosis following recovery from Major Depressive Disorder informs our understanding of depression vulnerability and provides engagement targets for prophylactic interventions.
A prospective fMRI neuroimaging design investigated the relationship between dysphoric reactivity and relapse following prophylactic intervention. Remitted depressed outpatients (N = 85) were randomized to 8 weeks of Cognitive Therapy with a Well-Being focus or Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy. Participants were assessed before and after therapy and followed for 2 years to assess relapse status. Neural reactivity common to both assessment points identified static biomarkers of relapse, whereas reactivity change identified dynamic biomarkers.
Dysphoric mood induction evoked prefrontal activation and sensory deactivation. Controlling for past episodes, concurrent symptoms and medication status, somatosensory deactivation was associated with depression recurrence in a static pattern that was unaffected by prophylactic treatment, HR 0.04, 95% CI [0.01, 0.14], p < .001. Treatment-related prophylaxis was linked to reduced activation of the left lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC), HR 3.73, 95% CI [1.33, 10.46], p = .013. Contralaterally, the right LPFC showed dysphoria-evoked inhibitory connectivity with the right somatosensory biomarker CONCLUSIONS: These findings support a two-factor model of depression relapse vulnerability, in which: enduring patterns of dysphoria-evoked sensory deactivation contribute to episode return, but vulnerability may be mitigated by targeting prefrontal regions responsive to clinical intervention. Emotion regulation during illness remission may be enhanced by reducing prefrontal cognitive processes in favor of sensory representation and integration.
对抑郁情绪诱导的神经反应性反映了痛苦促进认知反应和感觉回避的倾向。将这些反应与从重度抑郁症中恢复后的疾病预后联系起来,可以帮助我们了解抑郁易感性,并为预防干预提供目标。
前瞻性 fMRI 神经影像学设计研究了抑郁反应性与预防干预后复发之间的关系。缓解期的抑郁门诊患者(N=85)被随机分为 8 周认知治疗与幸福感焦点或正念认知治疗。参与者在治疗前后进行评估,并随访 2 年以评估复发情况。两个评估点共同的抑郁反应性确定了复发的静态生物标志物,而反应性变化确定了动态生物标志物。
抑郁情绪诱导引起前额叶激活和感觉失活。在控制过去发作、同时症状和药物状态的情况下,躯体感觉失活与复发呈静态模式相关,不受预防治疗的影响,HR 0.04,95%CI[0.01,0.14],p<0.001。与治疗相关的预防与左外侧前额叶皮质(LPFC)的激活减少有关,HR 3.73,95%CI[1.33,10.46],p=0.013。相反,右侧 LPFC 显示出与右侧躯体感觉生物标志物相关的抑郁诱发抑制性连接。
这些发现支持抑郁复发易感性的双因素模型,其中:持久的抑郁诱发感觉失活模式导致发作复发,但通过针对前额叶区域的干预,易感性可能得到缓解。在疾病缓解期间,通过减少有利于感觉表达和整合的前额叶认知过程,可能会增强情绪调节。