• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发性重度抑郁症中的认知反应性与功能失调性认知及复发预测

Cognitive reactivity versus dysfunctional cognitions and the prediction of relapse in recurrent major depressive disorder.

作者信息

Figueroa Caroline A, Ruhé Henricus G, Koeter Maarten W, Spinhoven Philip, Van der Does Willem, Bockting Claudi L, Schene Aart H

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Program for Mood Disorders, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;76(10):e1306-12. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09268.

DOI:10.4088/JCP.14m09268
PMID:26528654
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a burdensome disease that has a high risk of relapse/recurrence. Cognitive reactivity appears to be a risk factor for relapse. It remains unclear, however, whether dysfunctional cognitions alone or the reactivity of such cognitions to mild states of sadness (ie, cognitive reactivity) is the crucial factor that increases relapse risk. We aimed to assess the long-term predictive value of cognitive reactivity versus dysfunctional cognitions and other risk factors for depressive relapse.

METHOD

In a prospective cohort of outpatients (N = 116; studied between 2000-2005) who had experienced ≥ 2 previous major depressive episodes (MDEs) and were in remission (DSM-IV) at the start of follow-up, we measured cognitive reactivity, with the Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity (LEIDS), and dysfunctional cognitions, with the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale, simultaneously. Course of illness (with the primary outcome of MDE assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders Patient Edition) and time to relapse were monitored prospectively for 3.5 years.

RESULTS

Cognitive reactivity scores were associated with time to relapse over the 3.5-year follow-up and also when corrected for the number of previous MDEs and concurrent depressive symptoms (hazard ratio for 1 standard deviation [(HR(SD)); 20 points of the LEIDS, measuring cognitive reactivity] = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.04-2.09; P = .031). Rumination appeared to be a particularly strong predictor of relapse (HR(SD) = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.13-2.26; P = .007). Dysfunctional cognitions did not predict relapse over 3.5 years (HR(SD) = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.74-1.37; P = .93). Every 20-point increase on the cognitive reactivity scale resulted in a 10% to 15% increase in risk of relapse (corrected for previous MDEs and concurrent depressive symptoms).

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive reactivity--and particularly rumination--is a long-term predictor of relapse. Future research should address whether psychological interventions can improve cognitive reactivity scores and thereby prevent depressive relapses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN Identifier: 68246470.

摘要

目的

重度抑郁症(MDD)是一种负担沉重的疾病,复发风险很高。认知反应性似乎是复发的一个危险因素。然而,尚不清楚仅是功能失调性认知,还是此类认知对轻度悲伤状态的反应性(即认知反应性)是增加复发风险的关键因素。我们旨在评估认知反应性与功能失调性认知及其他抑郁复发危险因素的长期预测价值。

方法

在一个前瞻性队列门诊患者(N = 116;于2000 - 2005年进行研究)中,这些患者既往经历过≥2次重度抑郁发作(MDEs),且在随访开始时处于缓解期(DSM - IV标准),我们同时用莱顿抑郁敏感性指数(LEIDS)测量认知反应性,并用功能失调性态度量表测量功能失调性认知。前瞻性监测疾病进程(主要结局为通过DSM - IV轴I障碍患者版结构化临床访谈评估的MDE)和复发时间,为期3.5年。

结果

在3.5年的随访期间,认知反应性得分与复发时间相关,在对既往MDE次数和并发抑郁症状进行校正后也是如此(1个标准差的风险比[(HR(SD));LEIDS测量认知反应性的20分] = 1.47;95%置信区间,1.04 - 2.09;P = 0.031)。沉思似乎是复发的一个特别强的预测因素(HR(SD) = 1.60;95%置信区间,1.13 - 2.26;P = 0.007)。功能失调性认知在3.5年期间并未预测复发(HR(SD) = 1.00;95%置信区间,0.74 - 1.37;P = 0.93)。认知反应性量表上每增加20分,复发风险增加10%至15%(对既往MDE和并发抑郁症状进行校正后)。

结论

认知反应性——尤其是沉思——是复发的长期预测因素。未来的研究应探讨心理干预是否能够改善认知反应性得分,从而预防抑郁复发。

试验注册

ISRCTN标识符:68246470。

相似文献

1
Cognitive reactivity versus dysfunctional cognitions and the prediction of relapse in recurrent major depressive disorder.复发性重度抑郁症中的认知反应性与功能失调性认知及复发预测
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;76(10):e1306-12. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09268.
2
An investigation of the relationship between cognitive reactivity and rumination.认知反应性与沉思之间关系的调查。
Behav Ther. 2008 Mar;39(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
3
Mood reactivity rather than cognitive reactivity is predictive of depressive relapse: a randomized study with 5.5-year follow-up.心境反应而非认知反应可预测抑郁复发:一项随访 5.5 年的随机研究。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Jun;81(3):508-17. doi: 10.1037/a0032223. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
4
Dysfunctional cognitions of depressive inpatients and their relationship with treatment outcome.抑郁症住院患者的功能失调性认知及其与治疗结果的关系。
Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;58:50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.12.020. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
5
Long-term effects of preventive cognitive therapy in recurrent depression: a 5.5-year follow-up study.预防认知疗法对复发性抑郁症的长期影响:一项 5.5 年随访研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;70(12):1621-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04784blu.
6
Dysfunctional attitudes or extreme response style as predictors of depressive relapse and recurrence after mobile cognitive therapy for recurrent depression.功能失调的态度或极端反应模式可预测复发性抑郁症患者经移动认知疗法治疗后的抑郁复发和复发。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jan 15;243:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
7
Cognitive reactivity to sad mood provocation and the prediction of depressive relapse.对悲伤情绪激发的认知反应与抑郁复发的预测
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;63(7):749-55. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.749.
8
Recurrence of MDD: a prospective study of personality pathology and cognitive distortions.重性抑郁障碍的复发:一项前瞻性研究人格病理学和认知扭曲。
Personal Disord. 2011 Apr;2(2):83-97. doi: 10.1037/a0020456.
9
Cognitive reactivity: investigation of a potentially treatable marker of suicide risk in depression.认知反应性:抑郁障碍中自杀风险的一种潜在可治疗标志物的研究。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Apr;122(1-2):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.013. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
10
Presence of individual (residual) symptoms during depressive episodes and periods of remission: a 3-year prospective study.抑郁发作和缓解期个体(残留)症状的存在:一项为期 3 年的前瞻性研究。
Psychol Med. 2011 Jun;41(6):1165-74. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710001911. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of pre-existing subclinical depressive symptoms on the mental health of older adults during the COVID-19-related confinements: assessment of moderating factors including meditation training.COVID-19相关隔离期间既往亚临床抑郁症状对老年人心理健康的影响:对包括冥想训练在内的调节因素的评估
Sci Rep. 2025 May 7;15(1):15958. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99059-9.
2
Smartphone-based Monitoring and cognition Modification Against Recurrence of Depression (SMARD): An RCT of Memory Bias Modification Training vs. Cognitive Control Training vs. Attention Bias Modification Training in remitted recurrently depressed patients with 1.5 year follow-up.基于智能手机的抑郁症复发监测与认知修正(SMARD):一项随机对照试验,比较记忆偏差修正训练、认知控制训练和注意偏差修正训练对缓解期复发性抑郁症患者的效果,并进行1.5年随访。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 1;25(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06860-x.
3
Exploring the acute and chronic effects of a multistrain probiotic supplement on cognitive function and mood in healthy older adults: a randomized controlled trial.探索多菌株益生菌补充剂对健康老年人认知功能和情绪的急性和慢性影响:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Jun;121(6):1268-1280. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.04.002. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
4
Cognitive reactivity compared to other risk factors in the prediction of depressive episodes over two and nine years: a longitudinal cohort study.在预测两年和九年内抑郁发作方面,认知反应性与其他风险因素的比较:一项纵向队列研究。
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2025 Mar;29(1):32-40. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2025.2476509. Epub 2025 Mar 16.
5
Long-term depressive symptom trajectories and related baseline characteristics in primary care patients: Analysis of the PsicAP clinical trial.长期抑郁症状轨迹及其与初级保健患者基线特征的关系:PsicAP 临床试验分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 27;67(1):e32. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.27.
6
Discontinuation of psychotropic medication: a synthesis of evidence across medication classes.精神类药物停药:各类药物证据综合。
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;29(8):2575-2586. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02445-4. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
7
Neural signal variability relates to maladaptive rumination in depression.神经信号变异性与抑郁中的适应不良反刍有关。
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Dec;156:570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.10.070. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
8
Altered Variability and Concordance of Dynamic Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Indices in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Childhood Trauma.重度抑郁症和童年创伤患者动态静息态功能磁共振成像指标的变异性和一致性改变
Front Neurosci. 2022 May 9;16:852799. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.852799. eCollection 2022.
9
Factors associated with relapse and recurrence of major depressive disorder in patients starting mindfulness-based cognitive therapy.与开始接受正念认知疗法的患者中重度抑郁症复发和再发相关的因素。
Depress Anxiety. 2022 Feb;39(2):113-122. doi: 10.1002/da.23220. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
10
Cognitive reactivity among high-risk individuals at the first and recurrent episode of depression symptomology: A structural equation modelling analysis.高危个体在首次及复发性抑郁症状发作时的认知反应性:一项结构方程模型分析。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Feb;30(1):334-345. doi: 10.1111/inm.12789. Epub 2020 Sep 24.