Harley J P, Ray R S, Tomasi L, Eichman P L, Matthews C G, Chun R, Cleeland C S, Traisman E
Pediatrics. 1978 Jun;61(6):818-28.
Teacher ratings, objective classroom and laboratory observational data, attention-concentration, and other psychological measures obtained on 36 school-age, hyperactive boys under experimental and control diet conditions yielded no support for the Feingold hypothesis. Parental ratings revealed positive behavioral changes for the experimental diet; however, they seemed primarily attributable to one diet sequence. Parents' behavioral ratings on ten hyperactive, preschool boys indicated a positive response to the experimental diet; again, laboratory observations showed no diet effect.
对36名学龄期多动男孩在实验性饮食和对照饮食条件下获得的教师评分、客观的课堂和实验室观察数据、注意力集中程度以及其他心理测量结果,均未支持费因戈尔德假说。家长评分显示实验性饮食有积极的行为变化;然而,这些变化似乎主要归因于一种饮食顺序。对10名学龄前多动男孩的家长行为评分表明对实验性饮食有积极反应;同样,实验室观察未显示饮食有效果。