Suppr超能文献

基层医疗保健中卫生系统绩效指标选择过程的共同特征:系统评价。

Common Features of Selection Processes of Health System Performance Indicators in Primary Healthcare: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 19;11(12):2805-2815. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6239. Epub 2022 Mar 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health system performance indicators are widely used to assess primary healthcare (PHC) performance. Despite the numerous tools and some convergence on indicator criteria, there is not a clear understanding of the common features of indicator selection processes. We aimed to review the literature to identify papers that document indicator selection processes for health system performance indicators in PHC.

METHODS

We searched the online databases Scopus, Medline, and CINAHL, as well as the grey literature, without time restrictions, initially on July 31, 2019 followed by an update November 13, 2020. Empirical studies or reports were included if they described the selection of health system performance indicators or frameworks, that included PHC indicators. A combination of the process focussed research question and qualitative analysis meant a quality appraisal tool or assessment of bias could not meaningfully be applied to assess individual studies. We undertook an inductive analysis based on potential indicator selection processes criteria, drawn from health system performance indicator appraisal tools reported in the literature.

RESULTS

We identified 16 503 records of which 28 were included in the review. Most studies used a descriptive case study design. We found no consistent variations between indicator selection processes of health systems of high income and low- or lower-middle income countries. Identified common features of selection processes for indicators in PHC include literature review or adaption of an existing framework as an initial step; a consensus building process with stakeholders; structuring indicators into categories; and indicator criteria focusing on validity and feasibility. The evidence around field testing with utility and consideration of reporting burden was less clear.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight several characteristics of health system indicator selection processes. These features provide the groundwork to better understand how to value indicator selection processes in PHC.

摘要

背景

健康系统绩效指标被广泛用于评估基层医疗保健(PHC)的绩效。尽管有许多工具和一些指标标准的趋同,但对于指标选择过程的共同特征并没有明确的理解。我们旨在审查文献,以确定记录用于 PHC 健康系统绩效指标的指标选择过程的文献。

方法

我们在没有时间限制的情况下,最初于 2019 年 7 月 31 日在 Scopus、Medline 和 CINAHL 在线数据库以及灰色文献中进行了搜索,然后于 2020 年 11 月 13 日进行了更新。如果研究描述了健康系统绩效指标或框架的选择,包括 PHC 指标,则纳入经验研究或报告。关注过程的研究问题和定性分析的结合意味着无法有意义地应用质量评估工具或偏差评估来评估个别研究。我们根据文献中报告的健康系统绩效指标评估工具,基于潜在的指标选择过程标准进行了归纳分析。

结果

我们确定了 16503 条记录,其中 28 条被纳入综述。大多数研究采用描述性案例研究设计。我们没有发现高收入和低收入或中下收入国家的卫生系统指标选择过程之间存在一致的差异。在 PHC 中选择指标的选择过程的共同特征包括文献综述或对现有框架的改编作为初始步骤;利益相关者的共识建设过程;将指标结构化为类别;以及关注有效性和可行性的指标标准。围绕具有实用性和考虑报告负担的现场测试的证据不太清楚。

结论

我们的研究结果突出了健康系统指标选择过程的几个特征。这些特征为更好地理解如何在 PHC 中重视指标选择过程奠定了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a52/10105193/e83c9a891b17/ijhpm-11-2805-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验