Zheng Lvpiao, Feng Zhouyan, Xu Yipeng, Yuan Yue, Hu Yifan
Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering for the Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Mar 17;16:823423. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.823423. eCollection 2022.
Electrical pulses have been promisingly utilized in neural stimulations to treat various diseases. Usually, charge-balanced biphasic pulses are applied in the clinic to eliminate the possible side effects caused by charge accumulations. Because of its reversal action to the preceding cathodic phase, the subsequent anodic phase has been commonly considered to lower the activation efficiency of biphasic pulses. However, an anodic pulse itself can also activate axons with its "virtual cathode" effect. Therefore, we hypothesized that the anodic phase of a biphasic pulse could facilitate neuronal activation in some circumstances. To verify the hypothesis, we compared the activation efficiencies of cathodic pulse, biphasic pulse, and anodic pulse applied in both monopolar and bipolar modes in the axonal stimulation of alveus in rat hippocampal CA1 region . The antidromically evoked population spikes (APS) were recorded and used to evaluate the amount of integrated firing of pyramidal neurons induced by pulse stimulations. We also used a computational model to investigate the pulse effects on axons at various distances from the stimulation electrode. The experimental results showed that, with a small pulse intensity, a cathodic pulse recruited more neurons to fire than a biphasic pulse. However, the situation was reversed with an increased pulse intensity. In addition, setting an inter-phase gap of 100 μs was able to increase the activation efficiency of a biphasic pulse to exceed a cathodic pulse even with a relatively small pulse intensity. Furthermore, the latency of APS evoked by a cathodic pulse was always longer than that of APS evoked by a biphasic pulse, indicating different initial sites of the neuronal firing evoked by the different types of pulses. The computational results of axon modeling showed that the subsequent anodic phase was able to relieve the hyperpolarization block in the flanking regions generated by the preceding cathodic phase, thereby increasing rather than decreasing the activation efficiency of a biphasic pulse with a relatively great intensity. These results of both rat experiments and computational modeling firstly reveal a facilitation rather than an attenuation effect of the anodic phase on biphasic-pulse stimulations, which provides important information for designing electrical stimulations for neural therapies.
电脉冲已被成功应用于神经刺激以治疗各种疾病。通常,临床中应用电荷平衡双相脉冲来消除电荷积累可能引起的副作用。由于其对先前阴极相的反向作用,随后的阳极相通常被认为会降低双相脉冲的激活效率。然而,阳极脉冲本身也可以通过其“虚拟阴极”效应激活轴突。因此,我们推测双相脉冲的阳极相在某些情况下可以促进神经元激活。为了验证这一假设,我们比较了在大鼠海马CA1区海马槽轴突刺激中以单极和双极模式施加的阴极脉冲、双相脉冲和阳极脉冲的激活效率。记录了逆向诱发的群体峰电位(APS),并用于评估脉冲刺激诱导的锥体神经元的整合放电量。我们还使用计算模型来研究脉冲对距刺激电极不同距离处轴突的影响。实验结果表明,在脉冲强度较小时,阴极脉冲比双相脉冲能募集更多神经元放电。然而,随着脉冲强度增加,情况则相反。此外,设置100 μs的相间间隙能够提高双相脉冲的激活效率,即使在相对较小的脉冲强度下也能超过阴极脉冲。此外,阴极脉冲诱发的APS潜伏期总是比双相脉冲诱发的APS潜伏期长,这表明不同类型脉冲诱发的神经元放电起始部位不同。轴突建模的计算结果表明,随后的阳极相能够缓解先前阴极相在侧翼区域产生的超极化阻滞,从而提高而非降低强度相对较大的双相脉冲的激活效率。大鼠实验和计算建模的这些结果首次揭示了阳极相对双相脉冲刺激的促进而非衰减作用,这为设计神经治疗的电刺激提供了重要信息。