Fleming James N, Pollock McLean D, Taber David J, McGillicuddy John W, Diamantidis Clarissa J, Docherty Sharron L, Chambers Eileen T
Division of Transplant Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Department of Psychiatry and Developmental Neuroscience, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Transplant Direct. 2022 Feb 21;8(3):e1298. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001298. eCollection 2022 Mar.
With the rapid and widespread expansion of smartphone availability and usage, mobile health (mHealth) has become a viable multipurpose treatment medium for the US healthcare system.
The purpose of this review is to identify posttransplant mHealth applications that support patient self-management or a patient-provider relationship and aim to improve clinical outcomes. The interventions were then analyzed and evaluated to identify current gaps and future needs of mHealth apps in solid organ transplantation.
The authors found a nearly universal dichotomy between perceived utility and sustained use, with most studies demonstrating significant attrition during the course of the intervention. In addition, interoperability continues to be a challenge.
The authors present potential methods for mitigating the identified barriers and gaps in mHealth apps for solid organ transplant recipients.
随着智能手机可用性和使用率的迅速广泛扩展,移动健康(mHealth)已成为美国医疗系统一种可行的多用途治疗媒介。
本综述的目的是识别支持患者自我管理或患者与提供者关系并旨在改善临床结果的移植后移动健康应用程序。然后对这些干预措施进行分析和评估,以确定实体器官移植中移动健康应用程序当前的差距和未来需求。
作者发现感知效用与持续使用之间几乎普遍存在二分法,大多数研究表明在干预过程中出现显著损耗。此外,互操作性仍然是一个挑战。
作者提出了减轻实体器官移植受者移动健康应用程序中已识别的障碍和差距的潜在方法。