• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一款用于检测心脏移植人群药物不依从性的移动应用程序(mHeart):验证研究。

A Mobile App (mHeart) to Detect Medication Nonadherence in the Heart Transplant Population: Validation Study.

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.

Heart Failure and Heart Transplant Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 4;8(2):e15957. doi: 10.2196/15957.

DOI:10.2196/15957
PMID:32014839
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7055830/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication nonadherence in heart transplant recipients (HTxR) is related to graft loss and death. mHeart is a mobile app that uses electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) to identify and manage medication nonadherence in the outpatient heart transplant (HTx) population.

OBJECTIVE

The study primarily aimed to validate mHeart to measure medication nonadherence in early stage HTxR by assessing the psychometric properties of ePROMs. The secondary aims were to (1) measure patient satisfaction with the mHeart tool and its usability and (2) explore the impact of a theory-based treatment on medication nonadherence rates to determine its scalability to larger research.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted in the outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital. All consecutive early stage HTxR (<1.5 years from HTx) were included. The ePROM psychometric properties assessed were validity, reliability, responsiveness, interpretability, and burden. ePROMs comprised the 4-item Morisky-Green-Levine questionnaire and an adapted version of the Haynes-Sackett questionnaire. The Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ) was also applied on-site. Three consecutive medication nonadherence assessments were performed by a transplant pharmacist. To improve medication nonadherence, theory-based interventions were delivered in a 1-month period. Patient satisfaction was assessed by a semiquantitative Web-based survey at the end of the study.

RESULTS

We included 31 early stage HTxR (age: mean 54 years, SD 12 years), and 71% (22/31) of them were men. The HTxR were taking a mean 13 (SD 4; range 7-18) drugs per day. A total of 42% (13/31) of patients were unaware of the consequences of medication nonadherence, and 39% (12/31) of patients were nonadherent to immunosuppressive treatment. The content validity measure showed excellent levels of expert panel agreement for the Haynes-Sacket (14/14, 100%) and Morisky-Green-Levine (13/14, 93%) questionnaires. SMAQ and Morisky-Green-Levine ePROMs showed similar measurement domains (convergent validity, phi=0.6, P<.001), which, as expected, differed from Haynes-Sackett ePROMs (divergent validity, phi=0.3, P=.12). Reliability assessment revealed a very strong association between ePROM and on-site PROMs (phi>0.7, P<.001). Reproducibility was moderate (Haynes-Sackett κ=0.6, P<.002) or poor (Morisky-Green-Levine κ=0.3, P=.11) because of unexpected improved medication adherence rates during the test-retest period. According to responsiveness, the theory-based multifaceted intervention program improved medication nonadherence by 16% to 26% (P<.05). A burden analysis showed that ePROMs could potentially overcome traditional on-site limitations (eg, automatic recording of ePROM responses in the hospital information system). The mean score for overall patient satisfaction with the mHeart approach was 9 (SD 2; score range: 0-10). All 100% (29/29) of patients surveyed reported that they would recommend the mHeart platform to other HTxR.

CONCLUSIONS

ePROMs adhered to the quality standards and successfully identified medication nonadherence in the HTx population, supporting their widespread use. The theory-based intervention program showed a promising improvement in medication adherence rates and produced excellent patient satisfaction and usability scores in HTxR.

摘要

背景

心脏移植受者(HTxR)的药物依从性与移植物丢失和死亡有关。mHeart 是一款使用电子患者报告结局测量(ePROMs)的移动应用程序,用于识别和管理门诊心脏移植(HTx)人群中的药物不依从性。

目的

本研究旨在通过评估 ePROMs 的心理测量特性,验证 mHeart 用于测量早期 HTxR 患者的药物不依从性。次要目的是(1)测量患者对 mHeart 工具及其可用性的满意度,(2)探索基于理论的治疗对药物不依从率的影响,以确定其在更大规模研究中的可扩展性。

方法

在一家三级医院的门诊进行了一项前瞻性研究。所有连续的早期 HTxR(HTx 后<1.5 年)均纳入研究。评估的 ePROM 心理测量特性包括有效性、可靠性、反应性、可解释性和负担。ePROMs 包括 Morisky-Green-Levine 问卷的 4 项和 Haynes-Sackett 问卷的改编版。还在现场应用简化药物依从性问卷(SMAQ)。由一名移植药剂师进行了三次连续的药物不依从性评估。为了改善药物不依从性,在 1 个月的时间内提供了基于理论的干预措施。在研究结束时,通过半定量网络调查评估患者满意度。

结果

我们纳入了 31 名早期 HTxR(年龄:平均 54 岁,标准差 12 岁),其中 71%(22/31)为男性。HTxR 每天平均服用 13(标准差 4;范围 7-18)种药物。共有 42%(13/31)的患者不知道药物不依从的后果,39%(12/31)的患者不依从免疫抑制治疗。内容效度测量显示,Haynes-Sackett(14/14,100%)和 Morisky-Green-Levine(13/14,93%)问卷的专家小组具有出色的一致性水平。SMAQ 和 Morisky-Green-Levine ePROMs 显示出相似的测量领域(convergent validity,phi=0.6,P<.001),这与预期的 Haynes-Sackett ePROMs 不同(divergent validity,phi=0.3,P=.12)。可靠性评估显示 ePROM 与现场 PROM 之间存在非常强的关联(phi>0.7,P<.001)。由于在测试-重测期间药物依从性率意外提高,重现性为中度(Haynes-Sackett κ=0.6,P<.002)或较差(Morisky-Green-Levine κ=0.3,P=.11)。根据反应性,基于理论的多方面干预方案将药物不依从率提高了 16%至 26%(P<.05)。负担分析表明,ePROMs 可能克服传统现场的局限性(例如,在医院信息系统中自动记录 ePROM 响应)。患者对 mHeart 方法总体满意度的平均得分为 9(标准差 2;得分范围:0-10)。接受调查的所有患者(29/29)均表示他们将向其他 HTxR 推荐 mHeart 平台。

结论

ePROMs 符合质量标准,并成功识别出 HTx 人群中的药物不依从性,支持其广泛应用。基于理论的干预方案显示出改善药物依从性率的有希望的效果,并在 HTxR 中产生了出色的患者满意度和可用性评分。

相似文献

1
A Mobile App (mHeart) to Detect Medication Nonadherence in the Heart Transplant Population: Validation Study.一款用于检测心脏移植人群药物不依从性的移动应用程序(mHeart):验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 4;8(2):e15957. doi: 10.2196/15957.
2
Mobile Health to Improve Adherence and Patient Experience in Heart Transplantation Recipients: The mHeart Trial.移动健康改善心脏移植受者的依从性和患者体验:mHeart试验
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 14;9(4):463. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9040463.
3
Validation on the simplified medication adherence questionnaire (SMAQ) in renal transplant patients on tacrolimus.验证简化版用药依从性问卷(SMAQ)在接受他克莫司治疗的肾移植患者中的适用性。
Nefrologia. 2011;31(6):690-6. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Aug.10973.
4
Mobile medication manager application to improve adherence with immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients: A randomized controlled trial.移动药物管理应用程序改善肾移植受者免疫抑制治疗的依从性:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 5;14(11):e0224595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224595. eCollection 2019.
5
Nonadherence to Immunosuppressant Therapy of Kidney Transplant Candidate Patients: External Validation of the KATITA-25 Scale.肾移植候选患者免疫抑制剂治疗依从性差:KATITA-25 量表的外部验证。
Transplantation. 2024 Aug 1;108(8):1812-1820. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004994. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
6
Validity and reliability of a self-reported measure of medication adherence in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Singapore.新加坡 2 型糖尿病患者自报药物依从性测量的有效性和可靠性。
Diabet Med. 2012 Sep;29(9):e338-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03733.x.
7
Electronic patient-reported outcome measures using mobile health technology in rheumatology: A scoping review.电子患者报告结局测量在风湿病学中使用移动医疗技术:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0253615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253615. eCollection 2021.
8
Interdisciplinary Mobile Health Model to Improve Clinical Care After Heart Transplantation: Implementation Strategy Study.跨学科移动健康模型改善心脏移植术后临床护理:实施策略研究
JMIR Cardio. 2020 Nov 24;4(1):e19065. doi: 10.2196/19065.
9
Psychometric Properties of the Four-Item Morisky Green Levine Medication Adherence Scale among Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Participants.社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究参与者中四项版莫利斯基-格林-莱文药物依从性量表的心理测量学特性
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):996-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
10
Psychometric properties of the Osteoporosis-specific Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis newly treated with bisphosphonates.新接受双膦酸盐治疗的绝经后骨质疏松症女性骨质疏松特异性 Morisky 药物依从性量表的心理测量特性。
Ann Pharmacother. 2012 May;46(5):659-70. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q652. Epub 2012 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess the Usability of and User Experience with Mobile Health Applications.一份评估移动健康应用程序可用性和用户体验的问卷的验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 21;12(23):2328. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232328.
2
Evaluation of a Mobile App to Assist Patient Education and Research in Arthroplasty.一款用于辅助关节置换术患者教育与研究的移动应用程序的评估
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Nov 16;30:101549. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101549. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Optimization of a home hospitalization program for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with ehealth integration and clinical pharmacist involvement.

本文引用的文献

1
Multimorbidity and medication complexity: New challenges in heart transplantation.多发病共存和药物复杂性:心脏移植的新挑战。
Clin Transplant. 2019 Oct;33(10):e13682. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13682. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
2
Temporal Stability of Smartphone Use Data: Determining Fundamental Time Unit and Independent Cycle.智能手机使用数据的时间稳定性:确定基本时间单位和独立周期。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 26;7(3):e12171. doi: 10.2196/12171.
3
Evaluation of tools for annual capture of adherence to immunosuppressive medications after renal transplantation - a single-centre open prospective trial.
电子健康整合和临床药师参与的造血干细胞移植家庭住院计划的优化。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jun 11;15:1397115. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1397115. eCollection 2024.
4
Does an eHealth Intervention Reduce Complications and Healthcare Resources? A mHeart Single-Center Randomized-Controlled Trial.电子健康干预能否减少并发症和医疗资源?一项mHeart单中心随机对照试验。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Feb 10;10(2):77. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10020077.
5
Nurses' personal perceptions of clinical work adaptation during COVID-19.护士在 COVID-19 期间对临床工作适应的个人看法。
Heart Lung. 2022 Nov-Dec;56:175-180. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.07.014. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
6
Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future.实体器官移植中移动医疗应用程序的回顾与评估:过去、现在与未来
Transplant Direct. 2022 Feb 21;8(3):e1298. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001298. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Acceleration of mobile health for monitoring post-transplant in the COVID-19 era: Applications for pediatric settings.移动医疗在 COVID-19 时代监测移植后状况的加速应用:儿科环境的应用。
Pediatr Transplant. 2022 Feb;26(1):e14152. doi: 10.1111/petr.14152. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
8
Adherence to immunosuppression in adult heart transplant recipients: A systematic review.成人心脏移植受者免疫抑制治疗的依从性:系统评价。
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2021 Dec;35(4):100651. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100651. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
9
Adherence to Immunosuppression Medications among Heart Transplant Recipients: Challenges, Opportunities, and Potential Role of Digital Approaches in the COVID-19 Era.心脏移植受者对免疫抑制药物的依从性:新冠疫情时代的挑战、机遇及数字方法的潜在作用
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021 Jun 10;8(6):68. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8060068.
10
Mobile Health to Improve Adherence and Patient Experience in Heart Transplantation Recipients: The mHeart Trial.移动健康改善心脏移植受者的依从性和患者体验:mHeart试验
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 14;9(4):463. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9040463.
评价肾移植后每年监测免疫抑制药物依从性的工具 - 一项单中心开放前瞻性试验。
Transpl Int. 2019 Jun;32(6):614-625. doi: 10.1111/tri.13412. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
4
The Use and Effects of Electronic Health Tools for Patient Self-Monitoring and Reporting of Outcomes Following Medication Use: Systematic Review.电子健康工具在患者用药后自我监测及结果报告中的应用与效果:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 18;20(12):e294. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9284.
5
Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence: A Review.干预措施以提高用药依从性:综述。
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2461-2473. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19271.
6
Examining Predictors of Real-World User Engagement with Self-Guided eHealth Interventions: Analysis of Mobile Apps and Websites Using a Novel Dataset.考察现实世界中用户对自我引导式电子健康干预措施的参与度预测因素:使用新数据集对移动应用程序和网站进行分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 14;20(12):e11491. doi: 10.2196/11491.
7
Theory-Based Digital Interventions to Improve Asthma Self-Management Outcomes: Systematic Review.基于理论的数字干预措施改善哮喘自我管理效果:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 12;20(12):e293. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9666.
8
Responsiveness, Reliability, and Minimally Important and Minimal Detectable Changes of 3 Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain: Validation Study.3种用于腰痛的电子患者报告结局指标的反应性、可靠性、最小重要变化和最小可检测变化:验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 24;20(10):e272. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9828.
9
User's guide to correlation coefficients.相关系数用户指南。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 7;18(3):91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.
10
ESPACOMP Medication Adherence Reporting Guideline (EMERGE).《ESPACOMP 药物依从性报告指南(EMERGE)》。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jul 3;169(1):30-35. doi: 10.7326/M18-0543. Epub 2018 Jun 26.