• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CHADS-VASc评分对合并慢性肾脏病的急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者死亡率的预测价值

Predictive Value of the CHADS-VASc Score for Mortality in Hospitalized Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

作者信息

Wu Yaxin, Gao Yanxiang, Li Qing, Wu Chao, Xie Enmin, Tu Yimin, Guo Ziyu, Ye Zixiang, Li Peizhao, Li Yike, Yu Xiaozhai, Ren Jingyi, Zheng Jingang

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.

Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 16;9:790193. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.790193. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.790193
PMID:35369355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8965867/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have a high prevalence of coronary artery disease and a high risk of cardiovascular events. The present study assessed the value of the CHADS-VASc score for predicting mortality among hospitalized acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with CKD.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study that included CKD patients who were hospitalized for ACS from January 2015 to May 2020. The CHADS-VASc score for each eligible patient was determined. Patients were stratified into two groups according to CHADS-VASc score: <6 (low) and ≥6 (high). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 313 eligible patients were included in the study, with a mean CHADS-VASC score of 4.55 ± 1.68. A total of 220 and 93 patients were assigned to the low and high CHADS-VASc score groups, respectively. The most common reason for hospitalization was unstable angina (39.3%), followed by non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (35.8%) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (24.9%). A total of 67.7% of the patients (212/313) received coronary reperfusion therapy during hospitalization. The median follow-up time was 23.0 months (interquartile range: 12-38 months). A total of 94 patients (30.0%) died during follow-up. The high score group had a higher mortality rate than the low score group (46.2 vs. 23.2%, respectively; < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of all-cause death was higher in the high score group than in the low score group (Log-rank test, < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that CHADS-VASc scores were positively associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 2.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.26-3.27, < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The CHADS-VASc score is an independent predictive factor for all-cause mortality in CKD patients who are hospitalized with ACS. This simple and practical scoring system may be useful for the early identification of patients with a high risk of death.

摘要

背景

慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者冠状动脉疾病患病率高,心血管事件风险高。本研究评估了CHADS-VASc评分对预测住院急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)合并CKD患者死亡率的价值。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2015年1月至2020年5月因ACS住院的CKD患者。确定了每位符合条件患者的CHADS-VASc评分。根据CHADS-VASc评分将患者分为两组:<6(低)和≥6(高)。主要终点是全因死亡率。

结果

本研究共纳入313例符合条件的患者,CHADS-VASC评分均值为4.55±1.68。分别有220例和93例患者被分配到CHADS-VASc评分低分组和高分组。住院最常见原因是不稳定型心绞痛(39.3%),其次是非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(35.8%)和ST段抬高型心肌梗死(24.9%)。共有67.7%的患者(212/313)在住院期间接受了冠状动脉再灌注治疗。中位随访时间为23.0个月(四分位间距:12 - 38个月)。共有94例患者(30.0%)在随访期间死亡。高评分组的死亡率高于低评分组(分别为46.2%和23.2%;<0.001)。高评分组全因死亡的累积发生率高于低评分组(对数秩检验,<0.001)。多因素Cox回归分析表明,CHADS-VASc评分与全因死亡率呈正相关(风险比:2.02,95%置信区间:1.26 - 3.27,<0.001)。

结论

CHADS-VASc评分是住院ACS合并CKD患者全因死亡率的独立预测因素。这个简单实用的评分系统可能有助于早期识别死亡风险高的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac77/8965867/710a794005c9/fcvm-09-790193-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac77/8965867/cd3f5489d0a5/fcvm-09-790193-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac77/8965867/710a794005c9/fcvm-09-790193-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac77/8965867/cd3f5489d0a5/fcvm-09-790193-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac77/8965867/710a794005c9/fcvm-09-790193-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictive Value of the CHADS-VASc Score for Mortality in Hospitalized Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.CHADS-VASc评分对合并慢性肾脏病的急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者死亡率的预测价值
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 16;9:790193. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.790193. eCollection 2022.
2
Predictive value of CHADS and CHADS-VASc scores for coronary artery lesions and in-hospital prognosis of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.CHADS 和 CHADS-VASc 评分对急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者冠状动脉病变及院内预后的预测价值。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Sep 15;21(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02257-2.
3
Validation of the CHA2DS2-VASc Score in Predicting Coronary Atherosclerotic Burden and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.CHA2DS2-VASc评分在预测急性冠状动脉综合征患者冠状动脉粥样硬化负担及住院死亡率中的验证
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;120(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.266. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
4
Coronary artery disease severity and risk stratification of patients with non ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome using CHADS-VASc-HSF score.采用 CHADS-VASc-HSF 评分评估非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者的冠状动脉疾病严重程度和风险分层。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 May 21;24(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03929-5.
5
CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: assessment of coronary artery disease severity and complexity and comparison to other scoring systems in the prediction of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的CHA2DS2-VASc-HS评分:评估冠状动脉疾病的严重程度和复杂性,并与其他评分系统比较以预测院内主要不良心血管事件
Anatol J Cardiol. 2016 Oct;16(10):742-748. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2015.6593. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
6
Prognostic value of CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting high SYNTAX score and in-hospital mortality for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in patients without atrial fibrillation.CHA2DS2-VASc 评分对非心房颤动的非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者高 SYNTAX 评分和住院死亡率的预测价值。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2021 Nov;25(11):789-795. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.03982.
7
CHA2DS2-VASc Score as a Predictor of Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.CHA2DS2-VASc 评分作为慢性肾脏病患者心血管和全因死亡率的预测因子。
Am J Nephrol. 2021;52(5):404-411. doi: 10.1159/000516121. Epub 2021 May 11.
8
Usefulness of the CHADS-VASc Score to Predict Adverse Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.CHADS-VASc 评分在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的无房颤急性冠状动脉综合征患者中预测不良结局的价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Aug 15;124(4):476-484. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.036. Epub 2019 May 29.
9
CHA2DS2-VASc and R2CHA2DS2-VASc scores have predictive value in patients with acute coronary syndromes.CHA2DS2-VASc评分和R2CHA2DS2-VASc评分在急性冠脉综合征患者中具有预测价值。
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2015;125(7-8):545-52. doi: 10.20452/pamw.2965. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
10
CHA2DS2-VASc Score as an Independent Predictor of Suboptimal Reperfusion and Short-Term Mortality after Primary PCI in Patients with Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.CHA2DS2-VASc评分作为急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后再灌注不佳和短期死亡率的独立预测因素
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Feb 1;55(2):35. doi: 10.3390/medicina55020035.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of R2CHADS2, R2CHA2DS2-VASc, and R2CHA2DS2-VA Scores for the Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.评估R2CHADS2、R2CHA2DS2-VASc和R2CHA2DS2-VA评分对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院内死亡率的预测价值。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 30;14(13):4624. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134624.

本文引用的文献

1
CHA2DS2-VASc Score as a Predictor of Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.CHA2DS2-VASc 评分作为慢性肾脏病患者心血管和全因死亡率的预测因子。
Am J Nephrol. 2021;52(5):404-411. doi: 10.1159/000516121. Epub 2021 May 11.
2
Cardiovascular Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease: Pathophysiological Insights and Therapeutic Options.慢性肾脏病中的心血管疾病:病理生理学见解与治疗选择。
Circulation. 2021 Mar 16;143(11):1157-1172. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050686. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
China Kidney Disease Network (CK-NET) 2016 Annual Data Report.
中国肾脏病网(CK-NET)2016年度数据报告。
Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2020 Dec;10(2):e97-e185. doi: 10.1016/j.kisu.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
4
2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC.2020年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的心房颤动诊断和管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心房颤动诊断和管理特别工作组,由ESC欧洲心律协会(EHRA)特别贡献制定。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612.
5
2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.2020年欧洲心脏病学会非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 7;42(14):1289-1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575.
6
Assessment of the CHA2DS2-VASc Score in Predicting Mortality and Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes of Patients on Hemodialysis.评估 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分在预测血液透析患者死亡率和不良心血管结局的价值。
Am J Nephrol. 2020;51(8):635-640. doi: 10.1159/000508836. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
7
Value of the CHA DS -VASc score for predicting outcome in patients with heart failure.CHA DS -VASc评分对预测心力衰竭患者预后的价值。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;7(5):2553-2560. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12831. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
8
CHADS-VASc score as predictor of stroke and all-cause death in stable ischaemic heart disease patients without atrial fibrillation.CHADS-VASc 评分预测稳定性缺血性心脏病患者无房颤时的卒中和全因死亡。
J Neurol. 2020 Oct;267(10):3061-3068. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09961-7. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
9
Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家慢性肾脏病负担,1990-2017 年:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):709-733. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
10
US Renal Data System 2019 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States.美国肾脏数据系统2019年年报:美国肾脏疾病流行病学
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Jan;75(1 Suppl 1):A6-A7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Nov 5.