• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用 CHADS-VASc-HSF 评分评估非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者的冠状动脉疾病严重程度和风险分层。

Coronary artery disease severity and risk stratification of patients with non ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome using CHADS-VASc-HSF score.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Medicine Department, Assiut University Heart Hospital, Assiut University, Assiut, 71526, Egypt.

Department of Cardiology, Assiut Police Hospital, Assiut, 71514, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 May 21;24(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03929-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12872-024-03929-5
PMID:38773382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11106988/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification assessment of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE ACS) plays an important role in optimal management and defines the patient's prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of CHADS-VASc-HSF score (comprising of the components of the CHADS-VASc score with a male instead of female sex category, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and family history of coronary artery disease respectively) to predict the severity and complexity of CAD and its efficacy in stratification for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with NSTE ACS without known atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

This study included 200 patients (males 72.5%, mean age 55.8 ± 10.1 years) who were admitted with NSTE ACS. CHADS-VASC-HSF score was calculated on admission. Patients were classified into three groups according to their CHADS-VASC-HSF score: low score group (< 2; 29 patients), intermediate score group (2-4; 83 patients), and high score group (≥ 5; 88 patients). Coronary angiography was conducted and the Syntax score (SS) was calculated. Clinical follow-up at 6 months of admission for the development of MACE was recorded.

RESULTS

SS was significantly high in the high CHADS-VASc-HSF score group compared with low and intermediate score groups. CHADS-VASc-HSF score had a significant positive strong correlation with syntax score (r = 0.64, P < 0.001). Smoking, vascular disease, hyperlipidemia, and CHADS-VASc-HSF score were independent predictors of high SS. For the prediction of severe and complex CAD, CHADS-VASc-HSF score had a good predictive power at a cut-off value ≥ 5 with a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 65%. Hypertension, vascular disease, high SS, and CHADS-VASc-HSF score were independent predictors of MACE. CHADS-VASC-HSF score ≥ 4 was identified as an effective cut-off point for the development of MACE with 94% sensitivity and 70% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

CHADS-VASC-HSF score is proposed to be a simple bedside score that could be used for the prediction of the severity and complexity of CAD as well as a risk stratification tool for the development of MACE in NSTE ACS patients.

摘要

背景

非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE ACS)患者的风险分层评估在优化管理和确定患者预后方面发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在评估 CHADS-VASc-HSF 评分(包含 CHADS-VASc 评分的组成部分,分别为男性而非女性性别、高脂血症、吸烟和冠心病家族史)预测 CAD 严重程度和复杂性的能力,并评估其在预测无已知心房颤动的 NSTE ACS 患者主要不良心血管事件(MACE)中的分层作用。

方法

本研究纳入 200 例(男性 72.5%,平均年龄 55.8±10.1 岁)因 NSTE ACS 入院的患者。入院时计算 CHADS-VASC-HSF 评分。根据 CHADS-VASC-HSF 评分将患者分为三组:低评分组(<2;29 例)、中评分组(2-4;83 例)和高评分组(≥5;88 例)。行冠状动脉造影检查并计算Syntax 评分(SS)。记录入院后 6 个月时 MACE 的发生情况。

结果

高 CHADS-VASc-HSF 评分组的 SS 明显高于低评分组和中评分组。CHADS-VASc-HSF 评分与 Syntax 评分呈显著正强相关(r=0.64,P<0.001)。吸烟、血管疾病、高脂血症和 CHADS-VASc-HSF 评分是 SS 高的独立预测因素。对于严重和复杂 CAD 的预测,CHADS-VASc-HSF 评分在截断值≥5 时具有良好的预测能力,其敏感性为 86%,特异性为 65%。高血压、血管疾病、高 SS 和 CHADS-VASc-HSF 评分是 MACE 的独立预测因素。CHADS-VASC-HSF 评分≥4 是发生 MACE 的有效截断点,其敏感性为 94%,特异性为 70%。

结论

CHADS-VASC-HSF 评分是一种简单的床边评分,可用于预测 NSTE ACS 患者 CAD 的严重程度和复杂性,以及预测 MACE 的风险分层工具。

相似文献

1
Coronary artery disease severity and risk stratification of patients with non ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome using CHADS-VASc-HSF score.采用 CHADS-VASc-HSF 评分评估非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者的冠状动脉疾病严重程度和风险分层。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 May 21;24(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03929-5.
2
CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: assessment of coronary artery disease severity and complexity and comparison to other scoring systems in the prediction of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的CHA2DS2-VASc-HS评分:评估冠状动脉疾病的严重程度和复杂性,并与其他评分系统比较以预测院内主要不良心血管事件
Anatol J Cardiol. 2016 Oct;16(10):742-748. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2015.6593. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
3
Prediction of Coronary Artery Disease Severity by Using CHA2DS2-VASC-HSF Score in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.使用CHA2DS2-VASC-HSF评分预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的冠状动脉疾病严重程度
Mymensingh Med J. 2023 Apr;32(2):393-402.
4
ACEF performed better than other risk scores in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome during long term follow-up.ACEF 在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的长期随访中优于其他风险评分。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Feb 3;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01841-2.
5
CHADS-VASc-HSF score - New predictor of severity of coronary artery disease in 2976 patients.CHADS-VASc-HSF评分——2976例患者冠状动脉疾病严重程度的新预测指标。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;228:1002-1006. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.093. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
6
Validation of the CHA2DS2-VASc Score in Predicting Coronary Atherosclerotic Burden and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.CHA2DS2-VASc评分在预测急性冠状动脉综合征患者冠状动脉粥样硬化负担及住院死亡率中的验证
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;120(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.266. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
7
Predictive Value of CHADS -VASc-HSF Score for Severity of Acute Coronary Syndrome.CHADS-VASc-HSF 评分对急性冠状动脉综合征严重程度的预测价值。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022 Jan-Dec;28:10760296211073969. doi: 10.1177/10760296211073969.
8
Predictive value of newly defined CHA2DS2-VASc-HSF score for severity of coronary artery disease in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.新定义的CHA2DS2-VASc-HSF评分对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者冠状动脉疾病严重程度的预测价值
Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(9):954-60. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2016.0054. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
9
New CHADS-VASc-HSF score predicts the no-reflow phenomenon after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.新型 CHADS-VASc-HSF 评分预测 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后无复流现象。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Jul 25;20(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01623-w.
10
Prognostic value of CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for post-discharge outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.CHADS2和CHA2DS2-VASc评分对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者出院后结局的预后价值。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 24;99(30):e21321. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021321.

引用本文的文献

1
Hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score predict prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.血红蛋白、白蛋白、淋巴细胞和血小板(HALP)评分可预测心房颤动合并急性冠状动脉综合征患者或接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的预后。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jul 14;25(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04968-2.
2
Serum sST2, IL-33, and Hcy Expression in Older Adults Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Their Predictive Value for MACE.老年心肌梗死患者血清sST2、IL-33和同型半胱氨酸的表达及其对主要不良心血管事件的预测价值
Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Apr 25;20:495-504. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S519437. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Atherogenic Index of Plasma on Pre-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Flow in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数对急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入溶栓治疗心肌梗死血流的影响。
Angiology. 2024 Oct;75(9):841-848. doi: 10.1177/00033197231185204. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
2
Prediction of Coronary Artery Disease Severity by Using CHA2DS2-VASC-HSF Score in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.使用CHA2DS2-VASC-HSF评分预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的冠状动脉疾病严重程度
Mymensingh Med J. 2023 Apr;32(2):393-402.
3
Predictive Value of CHADS -VASc-HSF Score for Severity of Acute Coronary Syndrome.
CHADS-VASc-HSF 评分对急性冠状动脉综合征严重程度的预测价值。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022 Jan-Dec;28:10760296211073969. doi: 10.1177/10760296211073969.
4
2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.2020年欧洲心脏病学会非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 7;42(14):1289-1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575.
5
Risk stratification using the CHADS-VASc score in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention; sub-analysis of SHINANO registry.使用CHADS-VASc评分对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠心病患者进行风险分层;信浓注册研究的亚组分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2015 Feb 28;7:76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.02.007. eCollection 2015 Jun 1.
6
CHADS-VASc-HSF score - New predictor of severity of coronary artery disease in 2976 patients.CHADS-VASc-HSF评分——2976例患者冠状动脉疾病严重程度的新预测指标。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;228:1002-1006. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.093. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
7
CHADS-VASc Score Predicts In-Hospital and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Who Were Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.CHADS-VASc评分可预测接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的院内及长期临床结局。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2017 Mar;23(2):132-138. doi: 10.1177/1076029616646874. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
8
Predictive value of newly defined CHA2DS2-VASc-HSF score for severity of coronary artery disease in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.新定义的CHA2DS2-VASc-HSF评分对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者冠状动脉疾病严重程度的预测价值
Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(9):954-60. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2016.0054. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
9
CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: assessment of coronary artery disease severity and complexity and comparison to other scoring systems in the prediction of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的CHA2DS2-VASc-HS评分:评估冠状动脉疾病的严重程度和复杂性,并与其他评分系统比较以预测院内主要不良心血管事件
Anatol J Cardiol. 2016 Oct;16(10):742-748. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2015.6593. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
10
Usefulness of the CHA2DS2-VASC Score to Predict Adverse Outcomes in Patients Having Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.CHA2DS2-VASC评分对预测接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者不良结局的有效性
Am J Cardiol. 2016 May 1;117(9):1433-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Feb 17.