Walker W S, Raychaudhury T, Faichney A, Prescott R J, Tonkin R W, Sang C T, Cameron E W, Reid K G, Walbaum P R
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1986 Nov-Dec;27(6):662-6.
In a double blind, prospective, randomised study of 100 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery, a significant (p less than 0.01) reduction in wound colonisation, defined as positive culture of any wound discharge irrespective of wound appearance, occurred in those receiving preincisional presternal antibiotic infiltration (2%) as compared to a control group who received a similar volume of normal saline by the same route (24%). Both groups received, in addition, the same conventional intravenous regimen of broad spectrum antibiotic. A comparable concurrent group of patients, not entered into the study, demonstrated a wound colonisation rate similar to the trial control group (22%), thus excluding an adverse bias from the control saline infiltration. Analysis of control cases demonstrated a significant (p less than 0.001) discriminant effect in the degree of preoperative haemodilution with haematocrit falling on bypass by a mean of 25% in those who developed wound colonisation as compared to 13% in those who did not.
在一项针对100例行择期心脏手术患者的双盲、前瞻性、随机研究中,与通过相同途径接受相同体积生理盐水的对照组(24%)相比,接受切开前胸壁抗生素浸润的患者伤口定植(定义为无论伤口外观如何,任何伤口引流液培养呈阳性)显著减少(p<0.01)(2%)。此外,两组均接受相同的常规静脉广谱抗生素治疗方案。一组未纳入该研究的可比同期患者,其伤口定植率与试验对照组相似(22%),因此排除了对照生理盐水浸润带来的不良偏差。对对照病例的分析表明,术前血液稀释程度存在显著(p<0.001)判别效应,发生伤口定植的患者在体外循环期间血细胞比容平均下降25%,而未发生伤口定植的患者为13%。