Sauermilch Daniel, Siegel Karolynn, Hoppe Trevor, Roth Grant, Meunier Étienne
Department of Psychology, Long Island University, 1 University Plaza, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA.
Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 722 West 168th Street, New York, 10032 USA.
Sex Res Social Policy. 2023;20(2):692-704. doi: 10.1007/s13178-022-00710-1. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
The U=U (i.e., undetectable equals untransmittable) campaign is founded upon biomedical advancements that have positioned HIV as a manageable condition with effectively zero risk of transmission. In spite of these developments, attitudes of sexual and gender minority populations regarding the necessity of seropositive status disclosure remain unexamined.
The current study analyzed qualitative data regarding the necessity of seropositive status disclosure from 62 sexual minority men as well as transgender and gender non-conforming individuals who have sex with men from 2020 to 2021.
The majority of participants believed disclosure to be necessary and invoked several social and structural factors that informed their attitudes. Participants cited HIV criminalization laws, the ethics of non-disclosure, and disclosure as a means of educating sex partners when appraising the necessity of disclosure. Participants also presented concerns regarding U=U efficacy and HIV stigma.
Findings indicate that the disclosure of seropositive status to sex partners is still important to U=U-aware sexual and gender minority individuals. The majority of the study sample, irrespective of HIV status, believed seropositive status disclosure was necessary in advance of sex.
Findings suggest opportunities for public health messaging to remediate concerns about U=U efficacy, combat misinformation, and clarify out-of-date information on HIV criminalization.
“U=U”(即检测不到等于不具传染性)运动基于生物医学的进步,这些进步已将艾滋病毒定位为一种可控疾病,传播风险实际上为零。尽管有这些进展,但性少数群体和性别少数群体对披露血清阳性状态必要性的态度仍未得到审视。
本研究分析了2020年至2021年期间62名男同性恋性少数群体以及与男性发生性关系的跨性别者和性别不一致者关于披露血清阳性状态必要性的定性数据。
大多数参与者认为披露是必要的,并援引了几个影响他们态度的社会和结构因素。参与者在评估披露的必要性时提到了艾滋病毒定罪法、不披露的伦理以及将披露作为教育性伴侣的一种方式。参与者还对“U=U”的有效性和艾滋病毒污名化表示担忧。
研究结果表明,向性伴侣披露血清阳性状态对了解“U=U”的性少数群体和性别少数群体仍然很重要。大多数研究样本,无论艾滋病毒感染状况如何,都认为在发生性行为之前披露血清阳性状态是必要的。
研究结果表明,公共卫生宣传有机会消除对“U=U”有效性的担忧、打击错误信息并澄清关于艾滋病毒定罪的过时信息。