Łakuta Patryk
Institute of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland.
Institute of Psychology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Warsaw, Poland.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 18;13:795055. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.795055. eCollection 2022.
This study builds on growing evidence on implementation-intention-based self-affirmation intervention effects on mental health. Using a factorial design, this pre-registered study aimed to further investigate whether (1) strengthening the element of specificity within body-related self-affirming implementation intention (BS-AII) intervention compared to general self-affirming implementation intention (S-AII) would provide greater improvements in mental health outcomes for adults with psoriasis, and (2) whether the addition of a booster component would result in enhancing effectiveness at follow-up. A total of 306 adults with psoriasis were assessed for eligibility and 222 (aged 18-71 years) were randomized and received S-AII, BS-AII, or MGI (mere goal intention-control condition). Within each group, participants were again randomized to booster (B) or no-booster condition in a 3 × 2 factorial design, resulting in six groups: S-AII; S-AII + B; BS-AII; BS-AII + B; MGI; and MGI + B. Data were collected over three-time points, at baseline, 2 weeks post-intervention, and at 1-month later. Three primary outcomes were defined as a reduction of anxiety and depressive symptoms and enhancement of well-being. In terms of secondary outcomes, positive other- and self-directed feelings and also an emotional attitude toward the body were evaluated. To fully estimate intervention effects through intention-to-treat analysis, linear mixed models were used. A significant effect of time was observed, but no evidence of time-by-group interactions and no three-way interactions were detected. Exploratory analyses revealed two significant moderating effects of age and self-esteem, pointing to boundary conditions of the interventions. These findings offer to gain deeper insights on null (or negative) effects also reported in past works and highlight that self-affirmation interventions should be more thoroughly investigated and optimized before they can be broadly implemented in real-life contexts, especially to prevent backfiring and negative-enhancing effects.
本研究基于越来越多的证据,这些证据表明基于实施意图的自我肯定干预对心理健康有影响。采用析因设计,这项预先注册的研究旨在进一步调查:(1)与一般自我肯定实施意图(S-AII)相比,加强与身体相关的自我肯定实施意图(BS-AII)干预中的特异性要素是否能为银屑病成人患者带来更大的心理健康改善;(2)增加强化成分是否会提高随访时的有效性。共有306名银屑病成人患者接受了资格评估,222名(年龄在18至71岁之间)被随机分组,接受S-AII、BS-AII或MGI(单纯目标意图控制组)。在每组中,参与者再次按照3×2析因设计被随机分为强化组(B)或无强化组,从而形成六组:S-AII;S-AII + B;BS-AII;BS-AII + B;MGI;和MGI + B。在基线、干预后2周和1个月后这三个时间点收集数据。三个主要结局被定义为焦虑和抑郁症状的减轻以及幸福感的增强。在次要结局方面,评估了积极的他人导向和自我导向情感以及对身体的情感态度。为了通过意向性分析全面估计干预效果,使用了线性混合模型。观察到时间有显著影响,但未发现时间与组间的交互作用证据,也未检测到三因素交互作用。探索性分析揭示了年龄和自尊的两个显著调节作用,指出了干预的边界条件。这些发现有助于更深入地理解过去研究中也报道的无效(或负面)效应,并强调在自我肯定干预能够在现实生活中广泛实施之前,尤其是为了防止适得其反和负面增强效应,应该对其进行更深入的研究和优化。