• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新的尖端-顶点距离和基于 calcar 的尖端-顶点距离截断值可能是预测股骨干骨折髓内固定后切出风险的最佳指标。

New tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance cut-offs may be the best predictors for cut-out risk after intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures.

机构信息

Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.

Orthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, S. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04252-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-04252-1
PMID:35013492
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8748913/
Abstract

Cut-out is one of the most common mechanical failures in the internal fixation of trochanteric hip fractures. The tip-apex distance (TAD), and the calcar-referenced tip apex distance (CalTAD) are the radiographic parameters that most predict the risk of cut-out. The optimal CalTAD value has not yet been defined, but the optimal TAD value is reported as 25 mm or less. However, this cut-off is highly specific but poorly sensitive. The aim of this study was to determine highly specific and sensitive TAD and CalTAD values and shed light on the role of other clinical variables. A total of 604 patients were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. For each patient the following data were recorded: number of cut-out, AO/OTA classification, quality of the reduction, type of nail, cervicodiaphyseal angle, type of distal locking, post-operative weight-bearing, TAD and CalTAD values, and the position of the screw head in the femoral head according to the Cleveland system. The incidence of cut-out across the sample was 3.1%. The median TAD in the cut-out group was 38.72, while in the no cut-out group it was 22.16. The median CalTAD in the cut-out group was 39.34, while in the no cut-out group it was 22.19. The cut-off values for TAD and CalTAD with highest value of sensitivity and specificity for the risk of cut-out were 34.8 and 35.2, respectively. The incidence of cut-out can be reduced by performing careful minimal reduction and ensuring stable fixation by avoiding TAD > 34.8 mm and CalTAD > 35.2 mm.

摘要

切出是转子间骨折内固定最常见的机械故障之一。尖顶距(TAD)和基于小转子参考的尖顶距(CalTAD)是预测切出风险的最主要影像学参数。最佳 CalTAD 值尚未确定,但最佳 TAD 值报道为 25mm 或更小。然而,该截止值具有高度特异性但敏感性较差。本研究旨在确定高度特异性和敏感性的 TAD 和 CalTAD 值,并阐明其他临床变量的作用。共有 604 例患者纳入本回顾性横断面研究。记录每位患者的以下数据:切出数量、AO/OTA 分类、复位质量、钉类型、颈干角、远端锁定类型、术后负重、TAD 和 CalTAD 值以及根据克利夫兰系统螺钉头在股骨头中的位置。样本中切出的发生率为 3.1%。切出组的 TAD 中位数为 38.72,而无切出组的 TAD 中位数为 22.16。切出组的 CalTAD 中位数为 39.34,而无切出组的 CalTAD 中位数为 22.19。TAD 和 CalTAD 的截止值为 34.8 和 35.2,分别为切出风险的最高敏感性和特异性。通过仔细的最小复位并通过避免 TAD>34.8mm 和 CalTAD>35.2mm 来确保稳定固定,可以降低切出的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/8748913/5540948cd80b/41598_2021_4252_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/8748913/e9f55f8a8226/41598_2021_4252_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/8748913/20dda031c864/41598_2021_4252_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/8748913/b551885be9ca/41598_2021_4252_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/8748913/23ac5e75cd93/41598_2021_4252_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/8748913/5540948cd80b/41598_2021_4252_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/8748913/e9f55f8a8226/41598_2021_4252_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/8748913/20dda031c864/41598_2021_4252_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/8748913/b551885be9ca/41598_2021_4252_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/8748913/23ac5e75cd93/41598_2021_4252_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa2e/8748913/5540948cd80b/41598_2021_4252_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
New tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance cut-offs may be the best predictors for cut-out risk after intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures.新的尖端-顶点距离和基于 calcar 的尖端-顶点距离截断值可能是预测股骨干骨折髓内固定后切出风险的最佳指标。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04252-1.
2
Greater rate of cephalic screw mobilisation following proximal femoral nailing in hip fractures with a tip-apex distance (TAD) and a calcar referenced TAD greater than 25 mm.在股骨近端骨折中,当尖顶距(TAD)和参照股骨距的TAD大于25毫米时,股骨近端钉固定后头部螺钉松动率更高。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 May 2;13(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0814-1.
3
A mathematical simulation of the tip-apex distance and the calcar-referenced tip-apex distance for intertrochanteric fractures reduced with lag screws.使用拉力螺钉复位的转子间骨折的尖顶距离和参照股骨距的尖顶距离的数学模拟。
Injury. 2016 Jun;47(6):1302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.029. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
4
Traditional distance "tip-apex" vs. new calcar referenced "tip-apex" - which one is the best peritrochanteric osteosynthesis failure predictor?传统的“尖顶-顶点”距离与新的参照“尖顶-顶点”的比较 - 哪一个是预测股骨转子间骨折内固定失败的最佳指标?
Injury. 2020 Mar;51(3):674-677. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.01.024. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
5
Should the tip-apex distance (TAD) rule be modified for the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA)? A retrospective study.股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)是否需要修改尖端-顶点距离(TAD)规则?一项回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2013 Oct 17;8:35. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-8-35.
6
A six-year retrospective analysis of cut-out risk predictors in cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures: Can the tip-apex distance (TAD) still be considered the best parameter?股骨转子间骨折髓内钉固定切出风险预测因素的六年回顾性分析:尖顶距(TAD)仍可被视为最佳参数吗?
Bone Joint Res. 2017 Aug;6(8):481-488. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.68.BJR-2016-0299.R1.
7
Risk factors for cut-out of double lag screw fixation in proximal femoral fractures.股骨近端骨折双拉力螺钉固定失败的危险因素。
Injury. 2017 Feb;48(2):414-418. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.018. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
8
Predictive value of tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance for cut-out in 398 femoral intertrochanteric fractures treated in a private practice with dynamic intramedullary nailing.在一家私人诊所采用动力髓内钉治疗的398例股骨转子间骨折中,尖顶距离和以股骨距为参照的尖顶距离对穿出的预测价值。
Front Surg. 2024 Aug 14;11:1438858. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1438858. eCollection 2024.
9
Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures.股骨近端骨折顺行髓内钉固定失败的预测因素。
Bone Joint J. 2014 Aug;96-B(8):1029-34. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B8.33644.
10
Trochanteric fractures: Tip-Apex distance, Calcar Tip-Apex distance, and Chang criteria-a multiple variable analysis.转子间骨折:尖顶距、尖顶距距股骨头顶点距离和 Chang 标准-多变量分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Dec;143(12):7035-7041. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05018-2. Epub 2023 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of reduction quality and implant positioning in intertrochanteric fracture fixation: A review of key radiographic parameters.股骨粗隆间骨折内固定中复位质量及植入物位置的评估:关键影像学参数综述
World J Orthop. 2025 Aug 18;16(8):106982. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i8.106982.
2
The RESCUE Technique: A Mnemonic Acronym to Enhance Outcomes in Nail Fixation of Extracapsular Hip Fractures.RESCUE技术:一种用于提高髋关节囊外骨折钉固定效果的记忆术首字母缩写词。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 1;14(15):5419. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155419.
3
Larger nail-shaft gap as a potential risk factor of femoral head varus in patients treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation fixation: a retrospective, observational, single-center study with corresponding numerical simulation.

本文引用的文献

1
Traditional distance "tip-apex" vs. new calcar referenced "tip-apex" - which one is the best peritrochanteric osteosynthesis failure predictor?传统的“尖顶-顶点”距离与新的参照“尖顶-顶点”的比较 - 哪一个是预测股骨转子间骨折内固定失败的最佳指标?
Injury. 2020 Mar;51(3):674-677. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.01.024. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
2
The impact of warfarin on operative delay and 1-year mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture: a retrospective observational study.华法林对老年髋部骨折患者手术延迟和 1 年死亡率的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jun 4;14(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1199-5.
3
The STROBE guidelines.
较大的钉杆间隙作为股骨近端抗旋髓内钉固定治疗患者股骨头内翻的潜在危险因素:一项回顾性、观察性、单中心研究及相应的数值模拟
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jul 1;15(7):6032-6043. doi: 10.21037/qims-2024-2988. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
4
Are Tip-Apex Distance and Surgical Delay Associated with Increased Risk of Complications and Mortality Within the First Two Years After Surgery for Femoral Neck Fractures?股骨头颈骨折术后两年内,尖顶距离和手术延迟是否与并发症及死亡率增加相关?
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 15;14(14):4991. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144991.
5
[Osteosynthesis of subtrochanteric femoral fractures in adults].[成人股骨转子下骨折的骨固定术]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s00104-025-02334-8.
6
Predictive indicators of proximal femur nail antirotation device cut-out in intertrochanteric fractures: introduction of a novel radiographic parameter.股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗转子间骨折时内固定物切割的预测指标:一种新的影像学参数的引入
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 May 26;145(1):317. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05937-2.
7
Analysis of factors affecting the surgical efficacy for elderly intertrochanteric fracture.影响老年股骨粗隆间骨折手术疗效的因素分析
Front Surg. 2025 Apr 15;12:1589181. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1589181. eCollection 2025.
8
Predicting mechanical complications in proximal femoral nailing for elderly patients: a radiological scoring system based on a single-centre retrospective cohort with 586 cases.预测老年患者股骨近端髓内钉固定术后的机械并发症:基于一项包含586例病例的单中心回顾性队列研究的放射学评分系统
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Apr 12;51(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02850-6.
9
The lowest HU value on transverse planes: a predictive factor for cranial adjacent vertebral fracture risk after percutaneous vertebroplasty.横断面上的最低HU值:经皮椎体成形术后颅骨相邻椎体骨折风险的预测因素。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Feb 1;15(2):1275-1286. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1559. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
10
[Rotationally stable screw anchor (RoSA) vs. Gamma3 Nail (G3N) in pertrochanteric femoral fractures : A functional outcome analysis].转子间股骨骨折中旋转稳定型螺钉锚定器(RoSA)与Gamma3钉(G3N)的功能结果分析
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Oct;127(10):722-728. doi: 10.1007/s00113-024-01479-1. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
STROBE指南。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;13(Suppl 1):S31-S34. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18.
4
Epidemiology of hip fractures : Systematic literature review of German data and an overview of the international literature.髋部骨折的流行病学:德国数据的系统文献综述及国际文献概述
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Feb;52(1):10-16. doi: 10.1007/s00391-018-1382-z. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
5
Association Between Wait Time and 30-Day Mortality in Adults Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery.髋部骨折手术成年患者等待时间与30天死亡率之间的关联
JAMA. 2017 Nov 28;318(20):1994-2003. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17606.
6
Late postoperative analysis of the tip-apex distance (TAD) in pertrochanteric fractures: is there an accommodation of the implant within the bone?转子周围骨折术后晚期尖顶距(TAD)分析:植入物在骨内是否合适?
Injury. 2017 Oct;48 Suppl 4:S54-S56. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30776-3.
7
A six-year retrospective analysis of cut-out risk predictors in cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures: Can the tip-apex distance (TAD) still be considered the best parameter?股骨转子间骨折髓内钉固定切出风险预测因素的六年回顾性分析:尖顶距(TAD)仍可被视为最佳参数吗?
Bone Joint Res. 2017 Aug;6(8):481-488. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.68.BJR-2016-0299.R1.
8
Rewriting the tip apex distance for the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation.重新计算股骨近端抗旋髓内钉的尖顶距。
Injury. 2017 Aug;48(8):1843-1847. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
9
Can TAD and CalTAD predict cut-out after extra-medullary fixation with new generation devices of proximal femoral fractures? A retrospective study.TAD和CalTAD能否预测股骨近端骨折新一代髓外固定后的切出?一项回顾性研究。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
10
Risk factors for cut-out of double lag screw fixation in proximal femoral fractures.股骨近端骨折双拉力螺钉固定失败的危险因素。
Injury. 2017 Feb;48(2):414-418. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.018. Epub 2016 Nov 19.