School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, England.
Nurs Stand. 2022 Jun 1;37(6):29-33. doi: 10.7748/ns.2022.e11665. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
Logical fallacies can affect routine and complex decision-making, potentially leading to a reduction in the efficacy or application of robust evidence to care. Experienced and inexperienced nurses may inadvertently integrate fallacious reasoning into their clinical decisions due to the inherent deceptiveness of logical fallacies and the effect of cognitive biases. By gaining an understanding of logical fallacies, nurses may be able to identify them during clinical reasoning processes, thereby mitigating their effects on clinical outcomes. This article considers six of the most common logical fallacies and provides examples of how they might manifest in clinical practice.
逻辑谬误会影响日常和复杂的决策，可能导致强大证据的效果或应用减少。由于逻辑谬误的固有欺骗性和认知偏差的影响，有经验和无经验的护士可能会在临床决策中不知不觉地融入错误的推理。通过了解逻辑谬误，护士可能能够在临床推理过程中识别它们，从而减轻它们对临床结果的影响。本文考虑了最常见的六种逻辑谬误，并提供了它们在临床实践中可能表现出来的例子。
