Suppr超能文献

识别护理实践中的逻辑谬误,以支持有效的临床决策。

Recognising logical fallacies in nursing practice to support effective clinical decision-making.

机构信息

School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, England.

出版信息

Nurs Stand. 2022 Jun 1;37(6):29-33. doi: 10.7748/ns.2022.e11665. Epub 2022 Apr 4.

Abstract

Logical fallacies can affect routine and complex decision-making, potentially leading to a reduction in the efficacy or application of robust evidence to care. Experienced and inexperienced nurses may inadvertently integrate fallacious reasoning into their clinical decisions due to the inherent deceptiveness of logical fallacies and the effect of cognitive biases. By gaining an understanding of logical fallacies, nurses may be able to identify them during clinical reasoning processes, thereby mitigating their effects on clinical outcomes. This article considers six of the most common logical fallacies and provides examples of how they might manifest in clinical practice.

摘要

逻辑谬误会影响日常和复杂的决策,可能导致强大证据的效果或应用减少。由于逻辑谬误的固有欺骗性和认知偏差的影响,有经验和无经验的护士可能会在临床决策中不知不觉地融入错误的推理。通过了解逻辑谬误,护士可能能够在临床推理过程中识别它们,从而减轻它们对临床结果的影响。本文考虑了最常见的六种逻辑谬误,并提供了它们在临床实践中可能表现出来的例子。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验