López-Campos José Luis, Carrasco-Hernández Laura, Román Rodríguez Lucas, Quintana-Gallego Esther, Carmona Bernal Carmen, Alcázar Navarrete Bernardino
Unidad Médico-Quirúrgica de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Unidad Médico-Quirúrgica de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Arch Bronconeumol. 2020 Apr;56(4):242-248. doi: 10.1016/j.arbr.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
The emergence of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of a long-acting ß-agonist (LABA), a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in a single inhalation device has changed the approach to inhaled therapy. Although clinical trials describe the efficacy and safety of these FDCs, their use in daily clinical practice can present challenges for the clinician in two specific scenarios. In patients who are already receiving triple therapy via different devices, switching to FDCs could confer benefits by reducing critical errors in the management of inhalers, improving therapeutic adherence, and lowering costs, while maintaining the same clinical efficacy. In patients who are not receiving triple therapy in different devices and who require a change in treatment, triple therapy FDC has shown benefits in clinical trials. Although methodological differences among the trials advise against direct comparison, clinical results show good efficacy, but also considerable variability, and a number of clinical outcomes have yet to be explored. In the future, trials must be developed to complete clinical efficacy data. Real-world efficacy trials are needed, and studies must be designed to determine the profile of patients who present a greater therapeutic response to each FDC in order to pave the way towards more personalized treatment.
长效β受体激动剂(LABA)、长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)和吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)的固定剂量组合(FDC)在单一吸入装置中的出现改变了吸入治疗的方式。尽管临床试验描述了这些FDC的疗效和安全性,但在日常临床实践中,它们的使用在两种特定情况下可能给临床医生带来挑战。对于那些已经通过不同装置接受三联疗法的患者,改用FDC可能会带来益处,包括减少吸入器管理中的严重错误、提高治疗依从性和降低成本,同时保持相同的临床疗效。对于那些未通过不同装置接受三联疗法且需要改变治疗方案的患者,三联疗法FDC在临床试验中已显示出益处。尽管各试验之间的方法学差异不建议进行直接比较,但临床结果显示疗效良好,但也存在相当大的变异性,而且一些临床结局尚未得到探索。未来,必须开展试验以完善临床疗效数据。需要进行真实世界疗效试验,并且必须设计研究来确定对每种FDC有更大治疗反应的患者特征,以便为更个性化的治疗铺平道路。