Emergency Department and EMS, University Hospital of Amiens, 1 Rue du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80000, Amiens, France.
DREAMS, Department of Research in Emergency Medicine and Simulation, University Hospital and University of Amiens, 80000, Amiens, France.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):4069-4078. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01928-9. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
Chest tube insertion requires interdisciplinary teamwork including an emergency surgeon or physician in conjunction with a nurse. The purpose of the study was to validate an interdisciplinary performance assessment scale for chest tube insertion developed from literature analysis.
This prospective study took place in the simulation center of the University of Paris. The participants included untrained emergency/intensivist residents and trained novice emergency/intensivist physicians with less than 2 years of clinical experience and 6 months following training in thoracostomy, and nursing students. Each interdisciplinary pair participated in a high-fidelity simulation session. Two independent observers (O1 and O2) evaluated 61 items. Internal coherence using the Cronbach's α coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and correlation of scores by regression analysis (R2) were analyzed. Comparison between O1 and O2 mean scores used a t test and F test for SDs. p Value < 0.05 was significant.
From an initial selection of 11,277 articles, 19 were selected to create the initial scale. The final scale comprises 61 items scored out of 80, including 24 items for nursing items, 24 items for medical competence, and 13 mixed items for the competence of both. 40 simulations including 80 participants were evaluated. Cronbach's α = 0.76, ICC = 0.92, R2 = 0.88. There was no difference between the observers' assessments of means (p = 0.82) and SDs (p = 0.92). Score was 51.6 ± 5.9 in the group of untrained residents and nursing student, and 57.2 ± 2.8 in the trained group of novice physicians and nursing students (p = 0.0003).
This first performance assessment scale for interdisciplinary chest tube insertion is valid and reliable.
胸腔引流管插入需要多学科团队合作,包括急诊外科医生或医师与护士合作。本研究的目的是从文献分析中验证一种胸腔引流管插入的跨学科绩效评估量表。
这项前瞻性研究在巴黎大学的模拟中心进行。参与者包括未经培训的急诊/内科住院医师和经过培训的新手急诊/内科医师,他们的临床经验少于 2 年,并且在胸腔穿刺术后接受了 6 个月的培训,以及护理专业的学生。每个跨学科小组都参加了一次高保真模拟课程。两名独立观察员(O1 和 O2)评估了 61 项指标。使用 Cronbach's α 系数、组内相关系数(ICC)和回归分析得分相关系数(R2)分析内部一致性。通过 t 检验和 F 检验比较 O1 和 O2 的平均值,p 值<0.05 为有统计学意义。
从最初选择的 11277 篇文章中,选择了 19 篇文章来创建初始量表。最终量表由 61 项组成,总分为 80 分,其中包括 24 项护理项目、24 项医疗能力项目和 13 项两者混合的项目。共评估了 40 次模拟,涉及 80 名参与者。Cronbach's α=0.76,ICC=0.92,R2=0.88。观察者对平均值的评估没有差异(p=0.82)和标准差(p=0.92)。未接受培训的住院医师和护理专业学生组的平均得分为 51.6±5.9,接受过培训的新手医师和护理专业学生组的平均得分为 57.2±2.8(p=0.0003)。
这是第一个用于跨学科胸腔引流管插入的绩效评估量表,具有有效性和可靠性。