• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

躲在机器后面:人工智能代理可能有助于逃避惩罚。

Hiding Behind Machines: Artificial Agents May Help to Evade Punishment.

机构信息

TUM School of Governance, TU Munich, Richard-Wagner-Straße 1, 80333, Munich, Germany.

Bavarian Institute for Digital Transformation, TU Munich, Gabelsbergerstr. 4, 80333, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Apr 4;28(2):19. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00372-7.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-022-00372-7
PMID:35377086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8979930/
Abstract

The transfer of tasks with sometimes far-reaching implications to autonomous systems raises a number of ethical questions. In addition to fundamental questions about the moral agency of these systems, behavioral issues arise. We investigate the empirically accessible question of whether the imposition of harm by an agent is systematically judged differently when the agent is artificial and not human. The results of a laboratory experiment suggest that decision-makers can actually avoid punishment more easily by delegating to machines than by delegating to other people. Our results imply that the availability of artificial agents could provide stronger incentives for decision-makers to delegate sensitive decisions.

摘要

任务转移有时会对自主系统产生深远的影响,这引发了一系列伦理问题。除了这些系统道德代理的基本问题外,还出现了行为问题。我们研究了一个可以通过经验获得的问题,即在代理人是人工的而不是人类的情况下,代理人施加伤害是否会被系统地判断为不同。实验室实验的结果表明,决策者通过将决策委托给机器而不是其他人,实际上可以更容易地避免受到惩罚。我们的结果表明,人工代理的可用性可能为决策者提供更强的激励,使其将敏感决策委托出去。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e98/8979930/60a8deeb9df9/11948_2022_372_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e98/8979930/9e1d3f7ee614/11948_2022_372_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e98/8979930/9da5277e576f/11948_2022_372_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e98/8979930/60a8deeb9df9/11948_2022_372_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e98/8979930/9e1d3f7ee614/11948_2022_372_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e98/8979930/9da5277e576f/11948_2022_372_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e98/8979930/60a8deeb9df9/11948_2022_372_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Hiding Behind Machines: Artificial Agents May Help to Evade Punishment.躲在机器后面:人工智能代理可能有助于逃避惩罚。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Apr 4;28(2):19. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00372-7.
2
Time pressure and deliberation affect moral punishment.时间压力和深思熟虑会影响道德惩罚。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):16378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67268-3.
3
Moral outrage drives the interaction of harm and culpable intent in third-party punishment decisions.道德义愤驱动着第三方惩罚决策中伤害和有责意图的相互作用。
Emotion. 2022 Jun;22(4):795-804. doi: 10.1037/emo0000950. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
4
Crime and punishment: distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment.犯罪与惩罚:区分因果分析和意图分析在道德判断中的作用
Cognition. 2008 Aug;108(2):353-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
5
People are averse to machines making moral decisions.人们反对机器做出道德决策。
Cognition. 2018 Dec;181:21-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
6
They should have known better: The roles of negligence and outcome in moral judgements of accidental actions.他们本应更明白:疏忽与结果在对意外行为的道德评判中的作用。
Br J Psychol. 2022 May;113(2):370-395. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12536. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
7
Neural correlations of the influence of self-relevance on moral decision-making involving a trade-off between harm and reward.自我相关性对涉及伤害与奖励权衡的道德决策的影响的神经关联。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Sep;57(9):e13590. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13590. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
8
Artificial Moral Responsibility: How We Can and Cannot Hold Machines Responsible.人工道德责任:我们能够且不能如何让机器负责。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2021 Jul;30(3):435-447. doi: 10.1017/S0963180120000985.
9
Debunking (the) Retribution (Gap).破除(报应)差距。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1315-1328. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00148-6. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
10
The Moral Psychology of Artificial Intelligence.人工智能的道德心理学。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2024 Jan 18;75:653-675. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-030123-113559. Epub 2023 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Humans program artificial delegates to accurately solve collective-risk dilemmas but lack precision.人类设计人工代理来精确解决集体风险困境,但缺乏精确性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 24;122(25):e2319942121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319942121. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Responsibility Gaps and Retributive Dispositions: Evidence from the US, Japan and Germany.责任差距与报应倾向:来自美国、日本和德国的证据。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 17;30(6):51. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00509-w.
3
Willingness to take responsibility: Self-sacrifice versus sacrificing others in takeover decisions during autonomous driving.

本文引用的文献

1
Algorithmic discrimination causes less moral outrage than human discrimination.算法歧视比人为歧视引起的道德义愤更少。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Jan;152(1):4-27. doi: 10.1037/xge0001250. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
2
Debunking (the) Retribution (Gap).破除(报应)差距。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1315-1328. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00148-6. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
3
Holding Robots Responsible: The Elements of Machine Morality.《让机器人负责:机器道德的要素》
承担责任的意愿:自动驾驶过程中接管决策中的自我牺牲与牺牲他人。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(9):e29616. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29616. eCollection 2024 May 15.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 May;23(5):365-368. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
4
People are averse to machines making moral decisions.人们反对机器做出道德决策。
Cognition. 2018 Dec;181:21-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
5
Algorithm aversion: people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err.算法厌恶:人们在看到算法出错后会错误地避免使用算法。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Feb;144(1):114-26. doi: 10.1037/xge0000033. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
6
Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: an ethical analysis.自动驾驶车辆碰撞事故的责任:伦理分析
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Jun;21(3):619-30. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
7
Feeling robots and human zombies: mind perception and the uncanny valley.感受机器人和人类僵尸:心智知觉与恐怖谷
Cognition. 2012 Oct;125(1):125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
8
More than a body: mind perception and the nature of objectification.超越肉体:心智感知与客体化本质。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1207-20. doi: 10.1037/a0025883. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
9
On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.见人如己:拟人化的三因素理论。
Psychol Rev. 2007 Oct;114(4):864-86. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864.
10
Dimensions of mind perception.心理感知的维度。
Science. 2007 Feb 2;315(5812):619. doi: 10.1126/science.1134475.