• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

承担责任的意愿:自动驾驶过程中接管决策中的自我牺牲与牺牲他人。

Willingness to take responsibility: Self-sacrifice versus sacrificing others in takeover decisions during autonomous driving.

作者信息

Ju Uijong, Kim Sanghyeon

机构信息

Department of Information Display, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(9):e29616. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29616. eCollection 2024 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29616
PMID:38698973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11064069/
Abstract

In Level-3 autonomous driving, drivers are required to take over in an emergency upon receiving a request from an autonomous vehicle (AV). However, before the deadline for the takeover request expires, drivers are not considered fully responsible for the accident, which may make them hesitant to assume control and take on full liability before the time runs out. Therefore, to prevent problems caused by late takeover, it is important to know which factors influence a driver's willingness to take over in an emergency. To address this issue, we recruited 250 participants each for both video-based and text-based surveys to investigate the takeover decision in a dilemmatic situation that can endanger the driver, with the AV either sacrificing a group of pedestrians or the driver if the participants do not intervene. The results showed that 88.2% of respondents chose to take over when the AV intended to sacrifice the driver, while only 59.4% wanted to take over when the pedestrians would be sacrificed. Additionally, when the AV's chosen path matched the participant's intention, 77.4% chose to take over when the car intended to sacrifice the driver compared with only 34.3% when the pedestrians would be sacrificed. Furthermore, other factors such as sex, driving experience, and driving preferences partially influenced takeover decisions; however, they had a smaller effect than the situational context. Overall, our findings show that regardless of the driving intention of an AV, informing drivers that their safety is at risk can enhance their willingness to take over control of an AV in critical situations.

摘要

在3级自动驾驶中,要求驾驶员在收到自动驾驶车辆(AV)的请求后,在紧急情况下接管车辆。然而,在接管请求的截止日期到期之前,驾驶员对事故并不被认为负有全部责任,这可能会使他们在时间耗尽之前犹豫是否承担控制权并承担全部责任。因此,为了防止因接管延迟而导致的问题,了解哪些因素会影响驾驶员在紧急情况下接管的意愿非常重要。为了解决这个问题,我们分别招募了250名参与者进行基于视频和基于文本的调查,以研究在一种两难情况下的接管决策,即在参与者不干预的情况下,自动驾驶车辆要么牺牲一群行人,要么牺牲驾驶员,这可能会危及驾驶员。结果显示,当自动驾驶车辆打算牺牲驾驶员时,88.2%的受访者选择接管,而当行人会被牺牲时,只有59.4%的人想要接管。此外,当自动驾驶车辆选择的路径与参与者的意图相符时,当汽车打算牺牲驾驶员时,77.4%的人选择接管,而当行人会被牺牲时,只有34.3%的人选择接管。此外,性别、驾驶经验和驾驶偏好等其他因素部分影响了接管决策;然而,它们的影响比情境背景要小。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,无论自动驾驶车辆的驾驶意图如何,告知驾驶员他们的安全受到威胁可以增强他们在关键情况下接管自动驾驶车辆控制权的意愿。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ea/11064069/d0c493108f23/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ea/11064069/ed695552b0a3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ea/11064069/1820db57555b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ea/11064069/eb7eda62b36a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ea/11064069/8241dcd4a60c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ea/11064069/d0c493108f23/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ea/11064069/ed695552b0a3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ea/11064069/1820db57555b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ea/11064069/eb7eda62b36a/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ea/11064069/8241dcd4a60c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ea/11064069/d0c493108f23/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Willingness to take responsibility: Self-sacrifice versus sacrificing others in takeover decisions during autonomous driving.承担责任的意愿:自动驾驶过程中接管决策中的自我牺牲与牺牲他人。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(9):e29616. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29616. eCollection 2024 May 15.
2
Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles.自动驾驶汽车中的驾驶员信任、接受和接管行为:自动驾驶风格和驾驶员驾驶风格的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106238. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106238. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
3
In a heart beat: Using driver's physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles.心跳之间:利用驾驶员的生理变化来判断高度自动化车辆接管的质量。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Oct;131:180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
4
Getting back in the loop: Does autonomous driving duration affect driver's takeover performance?回归循环:自动驾驶时长会影响驾驶员的接管性能吗?
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 22;10(3):e24112. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24112. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
5
Influence of conventional driving habits on takeover performance in joystick-controlled autonomous vehicles: A low-speed field experiment.传统驾驶习惯对操纵杆控制的自动驾驶车辆接管性能的影响:一项低速现场实验。
Heliyon. 2024 May 28;10(11):e31975. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31975. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
6
The impact of different AR-HUD virtual warning interfaces on the takeover performance and visual characteristics of autonomous vehicles.不同增强现实抬头显示(AR-HUD)虚拟警告界面对自动驾驶接管性能和视觉特征的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(5):277-282. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2055752. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
7
Analyzing the Influencing Factors and Workload Variation of Takeover Behavior in Semi-Autonomous Vehicles.分析半自动驾驶汽车接管行为的影响因素及工作负荷变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 6;19(3):1834. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031834.
8
Effects of Task-Induced Fatigue in Prolonged Conditional Automated Driving.任务诱导疲劳对长时间条件自动化驾驶的影响。
Hum Factors. 2019 Nov;61(7):1186-1199. doi: 10.1177/0018720818816226. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
9
The effects of takeover request lead time on drivers' situation awareness for manually exiting from freeways: A web-based study on level 3 automated vehicles.接管请求提前期对驾驶员从高速公路手动驶出的情境意识的影响:基于网络的 3 级自动驾驶汽车研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Apr;168:106593. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106593. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
10
Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving.驾驶相关任务对自动驾驶接管性能影响的年龄相关差异。
J Safety Res. 2020 Feb;72:231-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.019. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Permissibility, Moral Emotions, and Perceived Moral Agency in Autonomous Driving Dilemmas: An Investigation of Pedestrian-Sacrifice and Driver-Sacrifice Scenarios in the Third-Person Perspective.自动驾驶困境中的可允许性、道德情感与感知到的道德能动性:从第三人称视角对行人牺牲和驾驶员牺牲场景的调查
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;15(8):1038. doi: 10.3390/bs15081038.
2
"All things equal": ethical principles governing why autonomous vehicle experts change or retain their opinions in trolley problems-a qualitative study.“在其他条件相同的情况下”:关于自动驾驶汽车专家在电车难题中改变或保留其观点的伦理原则——一项定性研究
Front Robot AI. 2025 May 27;12:1544272. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1544272. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysing the effect of gender on the human-machine interaction in level 3 automated vehicles.分析性别对 3 级自动驾驶汽车人机交互的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 8;12(1):11645. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16045-1.
2
Hiding Behind Machines: Artificial Agents May Help to Evade Punishment.躲在机器后面:人工智能代理可能有助于逃避惩罚。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Apr 4;28(2):19. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00372-7.
3
Take-Over Intention during Conditionally Automated Driving in China: Current Situation and Influencing Factors.中国条件自动驾驶接管意向:现状与影响因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 21;18(21):11076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111076.
4
Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles.自动驾驶汽车中的驾驶员信任、接受和接管行为:自动驾驶风格和驾驶员驾驶风格的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106238. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106238. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
5
Motor learning affects car-to-driver handover in automated vehicles.驾驶行为学习影响自动驾驶汽车的接管。
Sci Robot. 2016 Dec 6;1(1). doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aah5682. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
6
Age and gender differences in emergency takeover from automated to manual driving on simulator.在模拟器上从自动驾驶到手动驾驶的紧急接管中年龄和性别差异。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S163-S165. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1661677. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
7
Subjective emotional arousal: an explorative study on the role of gender, age, intensity, emotion regulation difficulties, depression and anxiety symptoms, and meta-emotion.主观情绪唤醒:性别、年龄、强度、情绪调节困难、抑郁和焦虑症状以及元情绪作用的探索性研究。
Psychol Res. 2020 Oct;84(7):1857-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01197-z. Epub 2019 May 16.
8
You or Me? Personality Traits Predict Sacrificial Decisions in an Accident Situation.你还是我?人格特质预测事故情境中的牺牲决策。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2019 May;25(5):1898-1907. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2899227. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
9
The Moral Machine experiment.道德机器实验。
Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):59-64. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
10
People are averse to machines making moral decisions.人们反对机器做出道德决策。
Cognition. 2018 Dec;181:21-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 11.