Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA91125.
Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA02115.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 19;119(16):e2118705119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2118705119. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
The primate inferior temporal cortex contains neurons that respond more strongly to faces than to other objects. Termed “face neurons,” these neurons are thought to be selective for faces as a semantic category. However, face neurons also partly respond to clocks, fruits, and single eyes, raising the question of whether face neurons are better described as selective for visual features related to faces but dissociable from them. We used a recently described algorithm, XDream, to evolve stimuli that strongly activated face neurons. XDream leverages a generative neural network that is not limited to realistic objects. Human participants assessed images evolved for face neurons and for nonface neurons and natural images depicting faces, cars, fruits, etc. Evolved images were consistently judged to be distinct from real faces. Images evolved for face neurons were rated as slightly more similar to faces than images evolved for nonface neurons. There was a correlation among natural images between face neuron activity and subjective “faceness” ratings, but this relationship did not hold for face neuron–evolved images, which triggered high activity but were rated low in faceness. Our results suggest that so-called face neurons are better described as tuned to visual features rather than semantic categories.
灵长类动物的下颞叶皮层包含对人脸比对其他物体反应更强烈的神经元。这些被称为“面孔神经元”的神经元被认为是对作为语义类别的面孔具有选择性。然而,面孔神经元也部分地对时钟、水果和单只眼睛做出反应,这就提出了一个问题,即面孔神经元是否更适合描述为对与面孔相关但与面孔分离的视觉特征具有选择性。我们使用了一种新描述的算法 XDream,来进化出强烈激活面孔神经元的刺激。XDream 利用了一种不受限于现实物体的生成式神经网络。人类参与者评估了为面孔神经元和非面孔神经元以及描绘面孔、汽车、水果等的自然图像而进化的图像。进化后的图像被一致地判断为与真实面孔明显不同。为面孔神经元进化的图像被评为比为非面孔神经元进化的图像更相似于面孔。在自然图像之间,面孔神经元活动和主观“面孔相似性”评分之间存在相关性,但这种关系不适用于面孔神经元进化后的图像,这些图像虽然引发了高度的活动,但在面孔相似性方面的评分却很低。我们的结果表明,所谓的面孔神经元更适合描述为对视觉特征而不是语义类别具有选择性。