Sharma Saloni, Vinken Kasper, Livingstone Margaret S
Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
bioRxiv. 2023 Sep 22:2023.09.22.558887. doi: 10.1101/2023.09.22.558887.
Humans are inclined to perceive faces in everyday objects with a face-like configuration. This illusion, known as face pareidolia, is often attributed to a specialized network of 'face cells' in primates. We found that face cells in macaque inferotemporal cortex responded selectively to pareidolia images, but this selectivity did not require a holistic, face-like configuration, nor did it encode human faceness ratings. Instead, it was driven mostly by isolated object parts that are perceived as eyes only within a face-like context. These object parts lack usual characteristics of primate eyes, pointing to the role of lower-level features. Our results suggest that face-cell responses are dominated by local, generic features, unlike primate visual perception, which requires holistic information. These findings caution against interpreting neural activity through the lens of human perception. Doing so could impose human perceptual biases, like seeing faces where none exist, onto our understanding of neural activity.
人类倾向于在日常物体中感知具有类似面部结构的面孔。这种被称为面部空想性错视的错觉,通常归因于灵长类动物中专门的“面部细胞”网络。我们发现,猕猴颞下皮质中的面部细胞对面部空想性错视图像有选择性反应,但这种选择性并不需要整体的、类似面部的结构,也不编码人类面部特征评分。相反,它主要由仅在类似面部的背景中被视为眼睛的孤立物体部分驱动。这些物体部分缺乏灵长类动物眼睛的常见特征,这表明了低级特征的作用。我们的结果表明,与需要整体信息的灵长类视觉感知不同,面部细胞反应主要由局部的、一般的特征主导。这些发现提醒我们不要通过人类感知的视角来解释神经活动。这样做可能会将人类的感知偏见,比如在不存在面孔的地方看到面孔,强加于我们对神经活动的理解中。