Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 4;17(4):e0266353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266353. eCollection 2022.
Pediatric legislations in the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) have increased medicines approved for use in the pediatric population. Despite many similarities between these frameworks, the EU Paediatric Regulation more often provides regulators with a mandate to require pediatric drug development for novel medicinal products compared to US regulators. If used, this could give rise to differences in the guidance for pediatric use provided for clinicians in the two regions. However, the level of discordance in the guidance for pediatric use between the two regions is unknown. This cross-sectional study compares guidance for pediatric use in the EU Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and the US Prescription Information (USPI) on the level of indications granted for novel medicinal products approved after the pediatric legislations came in to force in both regions. For all indications granted as of March 2020 for novel medicinal products approved in both regions between 2010 and 2018, we compared the guidance for pediatric use in the EU SmPC and the USPI. The guidance for pediatric use differed for 18% (61/348) of the listed indications covering 21% (45/217) of the products, but without the guidance being contradictory. Where guidance differed, an equal share was observed for indications with a higher level of information for pediatric use in one region over the other (49% (30/61) in the US; 51% (31/61) in the EU). The discrepancies in pediatric information could be explained by differences in regulations for 21% (13/61) of the indications. Only a few conditions and diseases (EU n = 4; US n = 1) were observed to cover potential pediatric use outside the approved adult indication. Although the EU Paediatric Regulation more often provides regulators a mandate for requiring pediatric drug development as compared to the US PREA, this was not reflected in the prescription information approved by the two regulatory authorities.
欧盟(EU)和美国(US)的儿科立法增加了批准用于儿科人群的药物。尽管这些框架有许多相似之处,但与美国监管机构相比,欧盟儿科法规更经常为监管机构提供要求开发新型药物儿科开发的任务。如果使用,这可能会导致两个地区的临床医生在儿科使用方面的指导意见存在差异。然而,目前尚不清楚这两个地区儿科使用指导意见的不一致程度。本横断面研究比较了欧盟产品特性摘要(SmPC)和美国处方信息(USPI)中关于批准新型药物的儿科使用指导意见,这些药物是在两个地区的儿科立法生效后批准的。对于截至 2020 年 3 月批准的新型药物的所有适应症,这些药物是在 2010 年至 2018 年期间在两个地区批准的,我们比较了欧盟 SmPC 和美国 USPI 中的儿科使用指导意见。列出的适应症中有 18%(61/348)的儿科使用指导意见不同,涵盖了 21%(45/217)的产品,但指导意见并不矛盾。指导意见不同的情况下,在一个地区比另一个地区的儿科使用信息水平更高的适应症中,观察到相同的比例(美国 49%(30/61);欧盟 51%(31/61))。儿科信息的差异可以用 21%(13/61)的适应症的法规差异来解释。仅观察到少数情况和疾病(欧盟 n=4;美国 n=1)在批准的成人适应症之外可能涵盖潜在的儿科用途。尽管与美国 PREA 相比,欧盟儿科法规更经常为监管机构提供要求开发新型药物儿科开发的任务,但这并没有反映在两个监管机构批准的处方信息中。