Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran.
Dentofacial Deformities Research Center, Research Institute for Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2022;32(1):77-84. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2021039830.
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is considered as a prerequisite in some cases of implant dentistry. For this purpose, bone materials are commonly used. Calcium compounds and Ca-P based materials like hydroxyapatite (HA, Ca10 (PO4)6(OH)2), due to their similarity with the human bone, can be used as graft materials for bone regeneration. This study aimed to evaluate biocompatibility of antler xenograft and compare the osteoconduction effects of antler xenograft with Cerabone in regeneration of calvarium bony defects of rabbits.
Five defects with a diameter of 6 mm and a depth of 3 mm were prepared in the calvarium of four rabbits. Thereafter, two defects were randomly grafted with antler xenograft, two defects were filled with Cerabone, and one defect remained as the untreated group. Histological evaluations, including measuring percentage of new regenerated bone and the amounts of osteoblast, osteoclast, and osteocyte cells, were also performed. To do statistical analyses, paired t-test, chi-square, and Fisher tests were applied.
The percentage of new bone formation was significantly higher in antler xenograft (73.33%) and in Cerabone (48.91%) compared to the untreated group (18.91%). The amounts of osteocytes and osteoblasts were obtained as 3.52 ± 0.17 and 2.41 ± 0.24 in the Antler xenograft and as 2.57 ± 0.29 and 2.31 ± 0.32 in the Cerabone group, respectively. Bone marrow formation were significantly higher in antler xenograft (6.66 ± 5.34) and Cerabone (1.99 ± 3.17) compared to the untreated group.
According to this pilot study, results of using antler xenograft as an osteoconductive materials in regeneration of rabbit calvarial defects are comparable with Cerabone. Although more clinical studies are needed.
引导骨再生(GBR)被认为是某些种植牙病例的前提条件。为此,通常使用骨材料。钙化合物和 Ca-P 基材料,如羟基磷灰石(HA,Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2),由于与人体骨骼相似,可用作骨再生的移植物材料。本研究旨在评估鹿角异种移植物的生物相容性,并比较鹿角异种移植物与 Cerabone 在兔颅骨骨缺损再生中的成骨作用。
在四只兔子的颅骨上制备五个直径为 6 毫米、深度为 3 毫米的缺损。此后,随机将两个缺损用鹿角异种移植物填充,两个缺损用 Cerabone 填充,一个缺损作为未处理组。还进行了组织学评估,包括测量新再生骨的百分比和成骨细胞、破骨细胞和骨细胞的数量。为了进行统计分析,应用了配对 t 检验、卡方检验和 Fisher 检验。
鹿角异种移植物(73.33%)和 Cerabone(48.91%)的新生骨形成百分比明显高于未处理组(18.91%)。鹿角异种移植物中获得的骨细胞和成骨细胞数量分别为 3.52±0.17 和 2.41±0.24,Cerabone 组分别为 2.57±0.29 和 2.31±0.32。鹿角异种移植物(6.66±5.34)和 Cerabone(1.99±3.17)的骨髓形成明显高于未处理组。
根据这项初步研究,鹿角异种移植物作为一种骨诱导材料在兔颅骨缺损再生中的结果与 Cerabone 相当。尽管需要更多的临床研究。