Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California.
Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Arthroscopy. 2022 Oct;38(10):2837-2849.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.03.027. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
The purpose of this study was to establish an international expert consensus on operating room findings that aid in the diagnosis of hip instability.
An expert panel was convened to build an international consensus on the operating room diagnosis/confirmation of hip instability. Seventeen surgeons who have published or lectured nationally or internationally on the topic of hip instability were invited to participate. Fifteen panel members completed a pre-meeting questionnaire and agreed to participate in a 1-day consensus meeting on May 15, 2021. A review of the literature was performed to identify published intraoperative reference criteria used in the diagnosis of hip instability. Studies were included for discussion if they reported and intraoperative findings associated with hip instability. The evidence for and against each criteria was discussed, followed by an anonymous voting process. For consensus, defined a priori, items were included in the final criteria set if at least 80% of experts agreed.
A review of the published literature identified 11 operating room criteria that have been used to facilitate the diagnosis of hip instability. Six additional criteria were proposed by panel members as part of the pre-meeting questionnaire. Consensus agreement was achieved for 8 criteria, namely ease of hip distraction under anesthesia (100.0% agreement), inside-out pattern of chondral damage (100.0% agreement), location of chondral damage on the acetabulum (93.3% agreement), pattern of labral damage (93.3% agreement), anteroinferior labrum chondral damage (86.7% agreement), perifoveal cartilage damage (97.6% agreement), a capsular defect (86.7% agreement), and capsular status (80.0% agreement). Consensus was not achieved for 9 items, namely ligamentum teres tear (66.7% agreement), arthroscopic stability tests (46.7% agreement), persistent distraction after removal of traction (46.7% agreement), findings of examination under anesthesia (46.7% agreement), the femoral head divot sign (40.0% agreement), inferomedial synovitis (26.7% agreement), drive-through sign (26.7% agreement), iliopsoas irritation (26.7% agreement) and ligamentum teres-labral kissing lesion (13.3% agreement). All experts agreed on the final list of 8 criteria items reaching consensus.
This expert panel identified 8 criteria that can be used in the operating room to help confirm the diagnosis of hip instability.
Level V expert opinion.
本研究旨在建立一套国际专家共识,以确定有助于髋关节不稳定诊断的手术室检查结果。
召集专家小组,就髋关节不稳定的手术室诊断/确认建立国际共识。邀请了 17 位在髋关节不稳定领域有发表论文或演讲的国际专家参加。15 名小组成员完成了会前问卷调查,并同意参加 2021 年 5 月 15 日为期一天的共识会议。对文献进行了回顾,以确定用于诊断髋关节不稳定的术中参考标准。如果研究报告了与髋关节不稳定相关的术中发现,则将其纳入讨论。讨论了每项标准的证据支持和反对情况,随后进行了匿名投票。共识的定义是预先确定的,如果至少 80%的专家同意,那么这些项目将被纳入最终的标准集。
对已发表文献的回顾确定了 11 项用于协助诊断髋关节不稳定的手术室标准。小组成员在会前问卷调查中提出了另外 6 项标准。有 8 项标准达成了共识,即麻醉下髋关节容易分离(100.0%的同意率)、软骨损伤的内翻模式(100.0%的同意率)、髋臼上软骨损伤的位置(93.3%的同意率)、唇损伤模式(93.3%的同意率)、前下唇软骨损伤(86.7%的同意率)、中心下软骨损伤(97.6%的同意率)、囊状缺陷(86.7%的同意率)和囊状状态(80.0%的同意率)。有 9 项未达成共识,即圆韧带撕裂(66.7%的同意率)、关节镜下稳定性试验(46.7%的同意率)、去除牵引后持续分离(46.7%的同意率)、麻醉下检查结果(46.7%的同意率)、股骨头凹陷征(40.0%的同意率)、内侧下滑膜炎(26.7%的同意率)、经关节突征(26.7%的同意率)、髂腰肌激惹(26.7%的同意率)和圆韧带-唇吻合损伤(13.3%的同意率)。所有专家均同意最终的 8 项标准清单,并达成共识。
本专家小组确定了 8 项可用于手术室以帮助确认髋关节不稳定诊断的标准。
专家意见 5 级。