• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用贝叶斯信念网络研究农民行为和政策干预措施,以改善氮素管理。

Using Bayesian Belief Networks to Investigate Farmer Behavior and Policy Interventions for Improved Nitrogen Management.

机构信息

Department of Ecological Modelling, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.

Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2022 Jun;69(6):1153-1166. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01635-6. Epub 2022 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-022-01635-6
PMID:35378602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9079016/
Abstract

Increasing farmers' adoption of sustainable nitrogen management practices is crucial for improving water quality. Yet, research to date provides ambiguous results about the most important farmer-level drivers of adoption, leaving high levels of uncertainty as to how to design policy interventions that are effective in motivating adoption. Among others, farmers' engagement in outreach or educational events is considered a promising leverage point for policy measures. This paper applies a Bayesian belief network (BBN) approach to explore the importance of drivers thought to influence adoption, run policy experiments to test the efficacy of different engagement-related interventions on increasing adoption rates, and evaluate heterogeneity of the effect of the interventions across different practices and different types of farms. The underlying data comes from a survey carried out in 2018 among farmers in the Central Valley in California. The analyses identify farm characteristics and income consistently as the most important drivers of adoption across management practices. The effect of policy measures strongly differs according to the nitrogen management practice. Innovative farmers respond better to engagement-related policy measures than more traditional farmers. Farmers with small farms show more potential for increasing engagement through policy measures than farmers with larger farms. Bayesian belief networks, in contrast to linear analysis methods, always account for the complex structure of the farm system with interdependencies among the drivers and allow for explicit predictions in new situations and various kinds of heterogeneity analyses. A methodological development is made by introducing a new validation measure for BBNs used for prediction.

摘要

提高农民对可持续氮管理实践的采用率对于改善水质至关重要。然而,迄今为止的研究对于农民采用的最重要驱动因素提供了模糊的结果,使得如何设计有效的政策干预措施以激励采用仍然存在高度的不确定性。其中,农民参与推广或教育活动被认为是政策措施的一个有前途的着力点。本文应用贝叶斯信念网络(BBN)方法来探讨被认为影响采用的驱动因素的重要性,运行政策实验来测试不同参与相关干预措施对提高采用率的效果,并评估干预措施对不同实践和不同类型农场的效果的异质性。基础数据来自 2018 年在加利福尼亚州中央山谷的农民中进行的一项调查。分析结果表明,在所有管理实践中,农场特征和收入一直是采用的最重要驱动因素。政策措施的效果根据氮管理实践而有很大差异。创新型农民对与参与相关的政策措施的反应优于传统型农民。与大型农场相比,小型农场的农民通过政策措施增加参与的潜力更大。与线性分析方法相比,贝叶斯信念网络始终考虑到农场系统的复杂结构,以及驱动因素之间的相互依存关系,并允许在新情况下进行明确预测和进行各种异质性分析。通过引入用于预测的 BBN 的新验证措施,实现了方法学的发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e82/9079016/66d8d8599736/267_2022_1635_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e82/9079016/0a0deb54cbee/267_2022_1635_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e82/9079016/d3f9970064e0/267_2022_1635_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e82/9079016/2a5bec2bdf8d/267_2022_1635_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e82/9079016/2ccb93b5d339/267_2022_1635_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e82/9079016/66d8d8599736/267_2022_1635_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e82/9079016/0a0deb54cbee/267_2022_1635_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e82/9079016/d3f9970064e0/267_2022_1635_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e82/9079016/2a5bec2bdf8d/267_2022_1635_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e82/9079016/2ccb93b5d339/267_2022_1635_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e82/9079016/66d8d8599736/267_2022_1635_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Bayesian Belief Networks to Investigate Farmer Behavior and Policy Interventions for Improved Nitrogen Management.利用贝叶斯信念网络研究农民行为和政策干预措施,以改善氮素管理。
Environ Manage. 2022 Jun;69(6):1153-1166. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01635-6. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
2
Social-psychological determinants of farmer intention to adopt nutrient best management practices: Implications for resilient adaptation to climate change.农民采纳养分最佳管理实践意愿的社会心理决定因素:对适应气候变化的弹性的启示。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Dec 15;276:111304. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111304. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
3
Spatial Dependence and Determinants of Dairy Farmers' Adoption of Best Management Practices for Water Protection in New Zealand.新西兰奶农采用水资源保护最佳管理实践的空间依赖性及影响因素
Environ Manage. 2017 Apr;59(4):594-603. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0823-6. Epub 2017 Jan 21.
4
Does the Adoption of Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices Impact Farmers' Income? Evidence from Ghana.采用气候智能型农业实践是否会影响农民收入?来自加纳的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;19(7):3804. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073804.
5
Adoption of Farm Management Systems for Cross Compliance - An empirical case in Germany.农场管理制度的采用——德国的一个实证案例。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Aug 15;220:109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.087. Epub 2018 May 26.
6
Invited review: Determinants of farmers' adoption of management-based strategies for infectious disease prevention and control.特邀综述:农民采用基于管理的传染病预防与控制策略的决定因素
J Dairy Sci. 2017 May;100(5):3329-3347. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11977. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
7
[Impacts of policy cognition on low-carbon agricultural technology adoption of farmers.].政策认知对农户低碳农业技术采用的影响。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Apr;32(4):1373-1382. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202104.024.
8
Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture Practices among Farmers in Kentucky, USA.美国肯塔基州农民对可持续农业实践的采用。
Environ Manage. 2018 Dec;62(6):1060-1072. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1109-3. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
9
Combining the best of two methodological worlds? Integrating Q methodology-based farmer archetypes in a quantitative model of agri-environmental scheme uptake.融合两种方法学领域的精华?将基于Q方法的农民原型整合到农业环境计划采用情况的定量模型中。
Agric Human Values. 2022;39(1):217-232. doi: 10.1007/s10460-021-10242-w. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
10
Social psychological factors drive farmers' adoption of environmental best management practices.社会心理因素推动农民采用环境最佳管理实践。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jan 15;350:119491. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119491. Epub 2023 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Effective Engagement Techniques Across the Agricultural Conservation Practice Adoption Process.农业保护实践采用过程中的有效参与技术。
Environ Manage. 2024 Dec;74(6):1173-1189. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-02043-8. Epub 2024 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustainability partnerships and viticulture management in California.加利福尼亚的可持续发展伙伴关系与葡萄栽培管理。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jul 1;217:214-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.033. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
2
Managing nitrogen for sustainable development.管理氮素以实现可持续发展。
Nature. 2015 Dec 3;528(7580):51-9. doi: 10.1038/nature15743. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
3
Involving stakeholders in building integrated fisheries models using Bayesian methods.运用贝叶斯方法让利益相关者参与到综合渔业模型的构建中。
Environ Manage. 2013 Jun;51(6):1247-61. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0041-9. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
4
Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: a meta-analysis of the adoption literature.为什么美国农民会采用最佳管理实践:对采用文献的元分析。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Apr 15;96(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.006. Epub 2011 Nov 25.