Ritter Caroline, Jansen Jolanda, Roche Steven, Kelton David F, Adams Cindy L, Orsel Karin, Erskine Ron J, Benedictus Geart, Lam Theo J G M, Barkema Herman W
Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr., Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
St. Anna Advies, 6525 ZM Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
J Dairy Sci. 2017 May;100(5):3329-3347. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11977. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
The prevention and control of endemic pathogens within and between farms often depends on the adoption of best management practices. However, farmers regularly do not adopt recommended measures or do not enroll in voluntary disease control programs. This indicates that a more comprehensive understanding of the influences and extension tools that affect farmers' management decisions is necessary. Based on a review of relevant published literature, we developed recommendations to support policy-makers, industry representatives, researchers, veterinarians, and other stakeholders when motivating farmers to adopt best management practices, and to facilitate the development and implementation of voluntary prevention and control programs for livestock diseases. Farmers will make management decisions based on their unique circumstances, agricultural contexts, beliefs, and goals. Providing them with rational but universal arguments might not always be sufficient to motivate on-farm change. Implementation of recommended management practices is more likely if farmers acknowledge the existence of a problem and their responsibility to take action. The perceived feasibility and effectiveness of the recommended management strategy and sufficient technical knowledge further increase the likelihood of adequate adoption. Farmers will also weigh the expected advantages of a proposed change against the expected disadvantages, and these considerations often include internal drivers such as pride or the desire to conform with perceived standards. Extension tools and farmers' social referents (e.g., veterinarians, peers) not only provide technical information but also influence these standards. Whereas mass media have the potential to deliver information to a broad audience, more personal approaches such as participatory group learning or individual communication with farm advisors can enable the tailoring of recommendations to farmers' situations. Approaches that appeal to farmers' internal motivators or that unconsciously elicit the desired behavior will increase the success of the intervention. Collaboration among stakeholders, assisted by social scientists and communication specialists, is necessary to provide a context that facilitates on-farm change and transfers consistent messages across extension tools in the most effective way.
农场内部和农场之间地方性病原体的预防和控制通常取决于最佳管理实践的采用。然而,农民经常不采用推荐的措施,或不参加自愿性疾病控制项目。这表明,有必要更全面地了解影响农民管理决策的因素和推广工具。基于对相关已发表文献的综述,我们制定了一些建议,以支持政策制定者、行业代表、研究人员、兽医和其他利益相关者激励农民采用最佳管理实践,并促进家畜疾病自愿预防和控制项目的制定与实施。农民将根据其独特情况、农业环境、信念和目标做出管理决策。向他们提供合理但通用的论据可能并不总是足以促使农场做出改变。如果农民认识到问题的存在以及他们采取行动的责任,那么推荐的管理实践更有可能得到实施。推荐管理策略的感知可行性和有效性以及足够的技术知识会进一步增加充分采用的可能性。农民还会权衡提议改变的预期优势与预期劣势,这些考虑因素通常包括诸如自豪感或符合感知标准的愿望等内在驱动力。推广工具和农民的社会参照对象(如兽医、同行)不仅提供技术信息,还会影响这些标准。虽然大众媒体有潜力向广大受众传递信息,但诸如参与式小组学习或与农场顾问的个人交流等更具针对性的方法能够根据农民的情况量身定制建议。吸引农民内在动机或无意识引发期望行为的方法将提高干预的成功率。利益相关者之间的合作在社会科学家和传播专家的协助下是必要的,以便提供一个促进农场变革并以最有效方式在各种推广工具中传递一致信息的环境。