• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Benchmarking Protocol Deviations and Their Variation by Major Disease Categories.基准协议偏差及其主要疾病类别的变化情况分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Jul;56(4):632-636. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00401-4. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
2
Protocol Design and Performance Benchmarks by Phase and by Oncology and Rare Disease Subgroups.按阶段和肿瘤学及罕见病亚组划分的方案设计和性能基准。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jan;57(1):49-56. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00438-5. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
3
New Benchmarks on Protocol Amendment Practices, Trends and their Impact on Clinical Trial Performance.关于方案修订实践、趋势及其对临床试验绩效影响的新基准。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 May;58(3):539-548. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00622-9. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
4
Protocol Design Variables Highly Correlated with, and Predictive of, Clinical Trial Performance.方案设计变量与临床试验表现高度相关且可预测。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Mar;56(2):333-345. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00370-0. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
5
New Benchmarks Characterizing Growth in Protocol Design Complexity.用于描述协议设计复杂性增长的新基准。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Jan;52(1):22-28. doi: 10.1177/2168479017713039. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
6
New Benchmarks on Protocol Amendment Experience in Oncology Clinical Trials.在肿瘤临床试验中修订方案经验的新基准
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Jul;58(4):645-654. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00629-2. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
7
Surveillance of protocol deviations in Japanese oncology registration trials: a single institute experience.日本肿瘤学注册试验中方案偏离的监测:单机构经验
Invest New Drugs. 2017 Jun;35(3):392-396. doi: 10.1007/s10637-017-0434-3. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
8
The Impact of Protocol Amendments on Clinical Trial Performance and Cost.方案修正案对临床试验绩效和成本的影响。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016 Jul;50(4):436-441. doi: 10.1177/2168479016632271.
9
Insights from a Multi-company Workshop to Apply a Patient Participation Burden Algorithm to Protocol Data.从多公司研讨会中获得的启示,应用患者参与负担算法于方案数据中。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Mar;57(2):262-270. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00467-0. Epub 2022 Oct 16.
10
Assessment of the Relationship Between Protocol Adherence, Study Complexity and Personnel in Surgical Clinical Trials.评估手术临床试验中方案依从性、研究复杂性和人员之间的关系。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):619-628. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00506-4. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and Characterization of Important Protocol Deviations in Clinical Trials in Argentina.阿根廷临床试验中重要方案偏差的发生率及特征
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00828-5.
2
Effect of Famotidine on Outcomes in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial.法莫替丁对肺动脉高压患者预后的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Chest. 2025 Jul;168(1):189-199. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.12.029. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
3
Postoperative intravenous iron to treat iron-deficiency anaemia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a protocol for a pilot, multicentre, placebo-controlled randomized trial (the POAM trial).术后静脉注射铁剂治疗心脏手术患者缺铁性贫血:一项试点、多中心、安慰剂对照随机试验方案(POAM试验)
BJA Open. 2024 Jul 27;11:100303. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100303. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Practical Guidelines for Standardised Resolution of Important Protocol Deviations in Clinical Trials Conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区开展的临床试验中重要方案偏离的标准化解决实用指南。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 May;58(3):395-403. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00604-3. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
5
A framework for assessing clinical trial site readiness.评估临床试验机构准备情况的框架。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May 8;7(1):e151. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.541. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing the Measure of Participation Burden in Protocol Design to Incorporate Logistics, Lifestyle, and Demographic Characteristics.增强方案设计中的参与负担衡量标准,纳入物流、生活方式和人口统计学特征。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Nov;55(6):1239-1249. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00336-2. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
2
Protocol Deviations: A Holistic Approach from Defining to Reporting.方案偏离:从定义到报告的整体方法。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Jul;55(4):733-742. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00269-w. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
Quality by Design in Clinical Trials: A Collaborative Pilot With FDA.临床试验中的质量源于设计:与美国食品药品监督管理局的合作试点项目
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2013 Mar;47(2):161-166. doi: 10.1177/0092861512458909.
4
The Life Cycle and Management of Protocol Deviations.方案偏离的生命周期与管理
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2014 Nov;48(6):762-777. doi: 10.1177/2168479014530119.
5
The Impact of Protocol Amendments on Clinical Trial Performance and Cost.方案修正案对临床试验绩效和成本的影响。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016 Jul;50(4):436-441. doi: 10.1177/2168479016632271.

基准协议偏差及其主要疾病类别的变化情况分析。

Benchmarking Protocol Deviations and Their Variation by Major Disease Categories.

机构信息

Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.

Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Jul;56(4):632-636. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00401-4. Epub 2022 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-022-00401-4
PMID:35378712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8979478/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little to no data exist quantifying and benchmarking the magnitude of protocol deviation experience.

METHODS

Nearly two-dozen companies provided the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development (Tufts CSDD) with data on the design and the performance of 187 protocols.

RESULTS

The results of this working group study show that phase II and III protocols have a mean total of 75 and 119 protocol deviations, respectively, involving nearly one-third of all patients enrolled in each clinical trial. Oncology clinical trials have the highest relative mean number of protocol deviations affecting more than 40% of patients enrolled in each trial. The number of endpoints, the number of procedures per visit, and the number of countries were modestly positively associated with and predictive of, the incidence of deviations per protocol. A strong positive relationship was shown between the number of investigative sites and the number of protocol deviations.

CONCLUSION

The results of this initial study provide useful measures that sponsor companies can use to benchmark their own protocol deviation experience, identify factors most associated with protocol deviations, and determine whether remediation is warranted.

摘要

背景

目前几乎没有数据可以量化和基准化协议偏离经验的程度。

方法

近二十家公司向塔夫茨药物开发研究中心(Tufts CSDD)提供了 187 项方案的设计和实施数据。

结果

该工作组研究的结果表明,II 期和 III 期方案分别平均有 75 项和 119 项方案偏离,涉及到每个临床试验中近三分之一的入组患者。肿瘤学临床试验的方案偏离相对平均数量最高,影响每个试验中超过 40%的入组患者。终点数量、每次就诊的程序数量和国家数量与偏离率呈适度正相关,并具有预测性。研究地点的数量与方案偏离数量之间存在很强的正相关关系。

结论

这项初步研究的结果提供了有用的衡量标准,赞助商可以用来基准化自己的方案偏离经验,确定与方案偏离最相关的因素,并确定是否需要补救。