• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验中的质量源于设计:与美国食品药品监督管理局的合作试点项目

Quality by Design in Clinical Trials: A Collaborative Pilot With FDA.

作者信息

Sprenger Kenneth, Nickerson David, Meeker-O'Connell Ann, Morrison Briggs W

机构信息

1 Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.

2 Office of Scientific Investigation, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2013 Mar;47(2):161-166. doi: 10.1177/0092861512458909.

DOI:10.1177/0092861512458909
PMID:30227529
Abstract

The quality of a clinical trial can be assessed by whether the trial meets the needs of its various customers, as well as by its freedom from critical deficiencies or errors. In order to ensure the quality of a clinical trial, it is therefore important to conduct quality planning in parallel with the process to design and prior to the conduct of the trial. Quality planning consists of prospectively establishing quality goals and developing the products and processes required to deliver a quality trial. This article describes the quality planning process conducted by a pharmaceutical sponsor for a clinical trial and the pilot review of the resulting integrated quality management plan by the FDA. This pilot demonstrates the usefulness of this process to enable alignment between sponsors and regulators concerning quality in clinical trials.

摘要

一项临床试验的质量可以通过该试验是否满足其各类客户的需求来评估,也可以通过其不存在重大缺陷或错误来评估。因此,为确保临床试验的质量,在试验设计过程中并行开展质量规划并在试验实施之前进行质量规划非常重要。质量规划包括前瞻性地确立质量目标以及开发开展高质量试验所需的产品和流程。本文描述了一家制药申办方针对一项临床试验开展的质量规划过程以及美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)对由此产生的综合质量管理计划进行的试点审查。该试点证明了这一过程对于促使申办方和监管机构在临床试验质量方面达成一致的有用性。

相似文献

1
Quality by Design in Clinical Trials: A Collaborative Pilot With FDA.临床试验中的质量源于设计:与美国食品药品监督管理局的合作试点项目
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2013 Mar;47(2):161-166. doi: 10.1177/0092861512458909.
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
3
Improving the operational efficiency of Phase 2 and 3 trials.提高二期和三期试验的运营效率。
Trials. 2016 Jul 20;17(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1465-3.
4
Operation of a radiopharmacy for a clinical trial.临床试验用放射性药物药房的运作。
Semin Nucl Med. 2010 Sep;40(5):347-56. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2010.06.002.
5
6
Quality of clinical trials: A moving target.临床试验的质量:一个不断变化的目标。
Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Oct;2(4):124-8. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.86880.
7
Iodine-131 Tositumomab: (131)I-anti-B1 antibody, (131)I-tositumomab, anti-CD20 murine monoclonal antibody-I-131, B1, Bexxar, (131)I-anti-B1 antibody, iodine-131 tositumomab, iodine-131 anti-B1 antibody, tositumomab.碘-131托西莫单抗:(131)I-抗B1抗体、(131)I-托西莫单抗、抗CD20鼠单克隆抗体-I-131、B1、美罗华、(131)I-抗B1抗体、碘-131托西莫单抗、碘-131抗B1抗体、托西莫单抗
BioDrugs. 2003;17(4):290-5. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200317040-00009.
8
Academic investigator-initiated trials and the challenge of sponsor responsibility: the Cologne Sponsor Model.学术型研究者发起的试验与申办者责任的挑战:科隆申办者模式。
Clin Trials. 2012 Dec;9(6):781-7. doi: 10.1177/1740774512461978. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
9
Recommendations for data monitoring committees from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.临床试验转化倡议组织对数据监测委员会的建议。
Clin Trials. 2017 Aug;14(4):342-348. doi: 10.1177/1740774517707743. Epub 2017 May 13.
10
Leading quality through the development of a multi-year corporate quality plan: sharing The Ottawa Hospital experience.通过制定多年期企业质量计划引领质量:分享渥太华医院的经验。
Healthc Q. 2011;14(2):32-8. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2013.22229.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the Gap: Quality by Design as a Catalyst for Enhanced Quality Management Systems in Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing.弥合差距:设计质量作为生物制药生产中强化质量管理体系的催化剂。
Curr Drug Discov Technol. 2025;22(4):e15701638312326. doi: 10.2174/0115701638312326240918093333.
2
Operational Differences between Product Development Partnership, Pharmaceutical Industry, and Investigator Initiated Clinical Trials.产品开发合作、制药行业和研究者发起的临床试验之间的运营差异。
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 29;9(3):56. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed9030056.
3
Benchmarking Protocol Deviations and Their Variation by Major Disease Categories.
基准协议偏差及其主要疾病类别的变化情况分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Jul;56(4):632-636. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00401-4. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
4
INVESTIGATING THE EFFICACY OF CLINICAL TRIAL MONITORING STRATEGIES: Design and Implementation of the Cluster Randomized START Monitoring Substudy.探究临床试验监测策略的疗效:整群随机START监测子研究的设计与实施
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Mar 1;49(2):225-233. doi: 10.1177/2168479014555912.
5
A data-driven approach to quality risk management.一种基于数据驱动的质量风险管理方法。
Perspect Clin Res. 2013 Oct;4(4):221-6. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.120171.