Nagasaka Misako, Ou Sai-Hong Ignatius
University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Orange, CA, USA.
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, CA, USA.
Lung Cancer (Auckl). 2022 Mar 29;13:13-21. doi: 10.2147/LCTT.S355503. eCollection 2022.
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become the preferred first line therapy for those patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Given superior progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when compared to earlier generations, third generation EGFR TKIs have become the first choice therapy in many parts of the world. Even though multiple strategies are in development to target both "on-target" and "off-target" resistance, the continuation of EGFR TKIs at the time of progression remains a controversial topic. This commentary focuses on both the "classic" clinical trials of IMpower150 and IMPRESS and compares them to the recently reported ORIENT-31 and ongoing MARIPOSA-2 to discuss the future therapeutic strategies in the setting of progression post-third generation EGFR TKIs.
酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)已成为那些患有携带表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的首选一线治疗方法。与早期几代药物相比,第三代EGFR TKIs具有更长的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),因此在世界许多地区已成为首选治疗方案。尽管目前正在开发多种针对“靶点内”和“靶点外”耐药性的策略,但在疾病进展时继续使用EGFR TKIs仍然是一个有争议的话题。本评论重点关注IMpower150和IMPRESS的“经典”临床试验,并将它们与最近报道的ORIENT-31和正在进行的MARIPOSA-2试验进行比较,以讨论第三代EGFR TKIs治疗后疾病进展情况下的未来治疗策略。